The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
THE IMPORTANCE OF COLLABORATIVE KNOW-HOW: AN EMPIRICAL TEST OF THE LEARNING ORGANIZATION.
Abstract
In this research, I proposed and tested a model of how firms learn from their strategic alliances. Based on a survey of 151 firms, the results suggest that experience alone is insufficient for the achievement of the greatest benefits from collaboration. Experience must be internalized first, and collaborative know-how must be developed for this experience to contribute to future collaborative benefits.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach
Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411 · Cited by 41,941
On the Evaluation of Structural Equation Models
Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988) · Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science · doi:10.1007/bf02723327 · Cited by 26,163
A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation
Nonaka, I. (1994) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.5.1.14 · Cited by 17,809
Self-Reports in Organizational Research: Problems and Prospects
Podsakoff, P. M., & Organ, D. W. (1986) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920638601200408 · Cited by 17,102
Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology
Kogut, B., & Zander, U. (1992) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.3.3.383 · Cited by 12,939
Interorganizational Collaboration and the Locus of Innovation: Networks of Learning in Biotechnology
Powell, W. W., Koput, K. W., & Smith-Doerr, L. (1996) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393988 · Cited by 8,499
Organizational learning: The contributing processes and the literatures
Huber, G. P. (1991) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.2.1.88 · Cited by 8,072
Grant, R. M. (1996) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.7.4.375 · Cited by 5,649
Eisenhardt, K. M., & Schoonhoven, C. B. (1996) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.7.2.136 · Cited by 2,672
Representing and Testing Organizational Theories: A Holistic Construal
Bagozzi, R. P., & Phillips, L. W. (1982) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2392322 · Cited by 2,064
Cited by
Zahra, S. A., Ireland, R. D., & Hitt, M. A. (2000) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/1556420 · Cited by 2,893
Kale, P., Dyer, J. H., & Singh, H. (2002) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.248 · Cited by 1,803
Capaldo, A. (2007) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.621 · Cited by 986
Learning from Failure: Towards an Evolutionary Model of Collaborative Ventures
Ariño, A., & de la Torre, J. (1998) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.9.3.306 · Cited by 976
Emotional Capability, Emotional Intelligence, and Radical Change
Huy, Q. N. (1999) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1999.1893939 · Cited by 926
Metadata
- Authors
- SIMONIN, B. L.
- Venue
- Academy of Management Journal
- Publisher
- Academy of Management
- Published
- 1997-10-01
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1150-1174
- ISSN
- 0001-4273 (ISSN-L)
- 1948-0989
- OpenAlex
- W2063365687
- Cited by
- 1,003
- References
- 11
- FWCI
- 38.17
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: THE IMPORTANCE OF COLLABORATIVE KNOW-HOW: AN EMPIRICAL TEST OF THE LEARNING ORGANIZATION. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.2307/256930
- The paper
- SIMONIN, B. L. (1997). THE IMPORTANCE OF COLLABORATIVE KNOW-HOW: AN EMPIRICAL TEST OF THE LEARNING ORGANIZATION. Academy of Management Journal. https://doi.org/10.2307/256930
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
