The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
DEVELOPMENT OF A LEADER-MEMBER EXCHANGE: A LONGITUDINAL TEST.
Abstract
This longitudinal study examines the development of leader-member-exchange (LMX) relationships via a model that extends and tests ideas presented but not yet fully tested in past theoretical models...
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“High-quality LMX indicates high levels of information exchange, interaction, trust, respect, support, mutual influence, and rewards (Bauer & Green, 1996).”
From The New Era Workplace Relationships: Is Social Exchange Theory Still Relevant? (2018) · cites this paper as Bauer & Green, 1996
Citations
Cites
Self-Reports in Organizational Research: Problems and Prospects
Podsakoff, P. M., & Organ, D. W. (1986) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920638601200408 · Cited by 17,102
THE BIG FIVE PERSONALITY DIMENSIONS AND JOB PERFORMANCE: A META‐ANALYSIS
BARRICK, M. R., & MOUNT, M. K. (1991) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.1744-6570.1991.tb00688.x · Cited by 8,689
Affect and Cognition Based Trust as Foundations for Interpersonal Cooperation in Organizations
McAllister, D. J. (1995) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/256727 · Cited by 7,346
Lewis, J. D., & Weigert, A. (1985) · Social Forces · doi:10.2307/2578601 · Cited by 4,163
A contrarian view of the five-factor approach to personality description.
Block, J. (1995) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.117.2.187 · Cited by 1,682 · cited 2×
“In their study of personality and leader-member exchange, Phillips and Bedeian (1994) found support for a relationship between exchange quality and extraversion, which is very similar to positive affectivity (Block, 1995). Fourth, Kurdek (1993) found that extraversion dissimilarity, along with other personality dimens…”
BackgroundWayne, S. J., & Ferris, G. R. (1990) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.75.5.487 · Cited by 860
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Meta-Analytic review of leader–member exchange theory: Correlates and construct issues.
Gerstner, C. R., & Day, D. V. (1997) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.82.6.827 · Cited by 3,005
Dulebohn, J. H., Bommer, W. H., Liden, R. C., Brouer, R. L., & Ferris, G. R. (2012) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206311415280 · Cited by 1,625
Authentic leadership and eudaemonic well-being: Understanding leader–follower outcomes
Ilies, R., Morgeson, F. P., & Nahrgang, J. D. (2005) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2005.03.002 · Cited by 1,268
The relationship of age to ten dimensions of job performance.
Ng, T. W. H., & Feldman, D. C. (2008) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.93.2.392 · Cited by 1,224
A Hierarchical Taxonomy of Leadership Behavior: Integrating a Half Century of Behavior Research
Yukl, G., Gordon, A., & Taber, T. (2002) · Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies · doi:10.1177/107179190200900102 · Cited by 951
Leader–Member Exchange (LMX) and Performance: A Meta‐Analytic Review
Martin, R., Guillaume, Y., Thomas, G., Lee, A., & Epitropaki, O. (2016) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/peps.12100 · Cited by 809
Liden, R. C., Erdogan, B., Wayne, S. J., & Sparrowe, R. T. (2006) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.409 · Cited by 595
Sturman, M. C. (2003) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1016/s0149-2063_03_00028-x · Cited by 578
Leadership and levels of analysis: A state-of-the-science review
Yammarino, F. J., Dionne, S. D., Uk Chun, J., & Dansereau, F. (2005) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2005.09.002 · Cited by 501
Leader–member exchange (LMX) and culture: A meta-analysis of correlates of LMX across 23 countries
Rockstuhl, T., Dulebohn, J. H., Ang, S., & Shore, L. M. (2012) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0029978 · Cited by 477
Leadership in applied psychology: Three waves of theory and research
Lord, R. G., Day, D. V., Zaccaro, S. J., Avolio, B. J., & Eagly, A. H. (2017) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/apl0000089 · Cited by 461
The New Era Workplace Relationships: Is Social Exchange Theory Still Relevant?
Chernyak-Hai, L., & Rabenu, E. (2018) · Industrial and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1017/iop.2018.5 · Cited by 315
Qin, X., Chen, C., Yam, K. C., Huang, M., & Ju, D. (2020) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/apl0000456 · Cited by 286
Why and When Leaders’ Affective States Influence Employee Upward Voice
Liu, W., Song, Z., Li, X., & Liao, Z. (2017) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2013.1082 · Cited by 241
A critique of the Leader-Member Exchange construct: Back to square one
Gottfredson, R. K., Wright, S. L., & Heaphy, E. D. (2020) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2020.101385 · Cited by 205
Trust and Leader—Member Exchange: A Closer Look at Relational Vulnerability
Scandura, T. A., & Pellegrini, E. K. (2008) · Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies · doi:10.1177/1548051808320986 · Cited by 160
Gooty, J., Serban, A., Thomas, J. S., Gavin, M. B., & Yammarino, F. J. (2012) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2012.10.002 · Cited by 71
Seppälä, T., Lipponen, J., Pirttila-Backman, A.-M., & Lipsanen, J. (2011) · European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology · doi:10.1080/1359432x.2010.507353 · Cited by 52
Han, J. H., Liao, H., Han, J., & Li, A. N. (2021) · Personnel Psychology · doi:10.1111/peps.12415 · Cited by 40
Metadata
- Authors
- BAUER, T. N., & GREEN, S. G.
- Affiliations
- Portland State University (US)
- ORCID
- BAUER, T. N.
- Venue
- Academy of Management Journal
- Publisher
- Academy of Management
- Published
- 1996-12-01
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1538-1567
- ISSN
- 0001-4273 (ISSN-L)
- 1948-0989
- OpenAlex
- W1971884640
- Cited by
- 944
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2026: 21 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 50 · 2020: 51 · 2019: 33 · 2018: 42 · 2017: 47 · 2016: 67 · 2015: 48 · 2014: 49 · 2013: 41 · 2012: 41
- FWCI
- 11.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Academy of Management Journal (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Team Dynamics and Performance
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Leadership and Management in Organizations
- Keywords
- leader-member exchange, longitudinal development, leader-member relations
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
