The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A New Perspective on Equity Theory: The Equity Sensitivity Construct
Abstract
Equity theory proposes that individuals who perceive themselves as either underrewarded or overrewarded will experience distress, and that this distress leads to efforts to restore equity. This paper describes a new construct, equity sensitivity, and proposes that reactions to equity/inequity are a function of an individual's preferences for different outcome/input ratios. The construct is delineated through a series of propositions, and implications for equity research in organizations are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Adams, J. S. (1965) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60108-2 · Cited by 10,818
New directions in equity research.
Walster, E., Berscheid, E., & Walster, G. W. (1973) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0033967 · Cited by 1,649
Cited by
Rousseau, D. M. (1990) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.4030110506 · Cited by 1,811
Colquitt, J. A., Scott, B. A., Rodell, J. B., Long, D. M., Zapata, C. P., Conlon, D. E., & Wesson, M. J. (2013) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0031757 · Cited by 1,462
The impact of personality on psychological contracts
Raja, U., Johns, G., & Ntalianis, F. (2004) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/20159586 · Cited by 822
Bolino, M. C., & Grant, A. M. (2016) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/19416520.2016.1153260 · Cited by 682
The appropriateness of RAPM: toward the further development of theory
Hartmann, F. G. H. (2000) · Accounting, Organizations and Society · doi:10.1016/s0361-3682(98)00036-1 · Cited by 324
Kollmann, T., Stöckmann, C., Kensbock, J. M., & Peschl, A. (2020) · Human Resource Management · doi:10.1002/hrm.21981 · Cited by 209
Helping People by Being in the Present: Mindfulness Increases Prosocial Behavior
Hafenbrack, A. C., Cameron, L. D., Spreitzer, G. M., Zhang, C., Noval, L. J., & Shaffakat, S. (2020) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2019.08.005 · Cited by 189
A test and refinement of the equity sensitivity construct
King, W. C., Miles, E. W., & Day, D. D. (1993) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.4030140403 · Cited by 185
Self-citationEquity sensitivity and outcome importance
Miles, E. W., Hatfield, J. D., & Huseman, R. C. (1994) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.4030150704 · Cited by 148
Self-citationJustice and rejection sensitivity in children and adolescents with ADHD symptoms
Bondü, R., & Esser, G. (2015) · European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry · doi:10.1007/s00787-014-0560-9 · Cited by 59
Equal or equitable pay? Individual differences in pay fairness perceptions
Kim, T., Wang, J., Chen, T., Zhu, Y., & Sun, R. (2019) · Human Resource Management · doi:10.1002/hrm.21944 · Cited by 41
Metadata
- Authors
- Huseman, R. C., Hatfield, J. D., & Miles, E. W.
- Venue
- The Academy of Management Review
- Publisher
- Academy of Management
- Published
- 1987-04
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 222
- ISSN
- 0363-7425 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2081262187
- Cited by
- 866
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 7.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
