Voting: A Study of Opinion Formation in a Presidential Campaign

Smith, Donald, Berelson, Bernard R., Lazarsfeld, Paul F., McPhee, William N.·1955·The American Catholic Sociological Review

DOI 10.2307/3709070

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2307/3709070

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Framing theory
Chong, D., & Druckman, J. N. (2007) · Annual Review of Political Science · doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.10.072805.103054 · Cited by 3,071
Fear and loathing across party lines: New evidence on group polarization
Iyengar, S., & Westwood, S. J. (2015) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/ajps.12152 · Cited by 2,452
A New Era of Minimal Effects? The Changing Foundations of Political Communication
Bennett, W. L., & Iyengar, S. (2008) · Journal of Communication · doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.00410.x · Cited by 1,558
Choosing Preferences by Constructing Institutions: A Cultural Theory of Preference Formation
Wildavsky, A. (1987) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.2307/1960776 · Cited by 1,021
Science audiences, misinformation, and fake news
Scheufele, D. A., & Krause, N. M. (2019) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1805871115 · Cited by 878
Losers' Consent: Elections and Democratic Legitimacy
Anderson, C. J., Blais, A., Bowler, S., Donovan, T., & Listhaug, O. (2005) · doi:10.1093/0199276382.001.0001 · Cited by 820
Out of One, Many: Using Language Models to Simulate Human Samples
Argyle, L. P., Busby, E. C., Fulda, N., Gubler, J. R., Rytting, C., & Wingate, D. (2023) · Political Analysis · doi:10.1017/pan.2023.2 · Cited by 783
Partisanship, health behavior, and policy attitudes in the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic
Gadarian, S. K., Goodman, S. W., & Pepinsky, T. B. (2021) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0249596 · Cited by 744
The Parties in Our Heads: Misperceptions about Party Composition and Their Consequences
Ahler, D. J., & Sood, G. (2018) · The Journal of Politics · doi:10.1086/697253 · Cited by 586
CITIZENSHIP AND CIVIC ENGAGEMENT
Theiss-Morse, E., & Hibbing, J. R. (2005) · Annual Review of Political Science · doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.8.082103.104829 · Cited by 406
Conceptualizing and Measuring Participation in the Age of the Internet: Is Online Political Engagement Really Different to Offline?
Gibson, R., & Cantijoch, M. (2013) · The Journal of Politics · doi:10.1017/s0022381613000431 · Cited by 401
Frenemies: How Social Media Polarizes America
Settle, J. E. (2018) · doi:10.1017/9781108560573 · Cited by 377
Voter Migration and the Geographic Sorting of the American Electorate
Tam Cho, W. K., Gimpel, J. G., & Hui, I. S. (2013) · Annals of the Association of American Geographers · doi:10.1080/00045608.2012.720229 · Cited by 315
The New Personal Influence: How Our Facebook Friends Influence the News We Read
Anspach, N. M. (2017) · Political Communication · doi:10.1080/10584609.2017.1316329 · Cited by 289
Assessing the Russian Internet Research Agency's impact on the political attitudes and behaviors of American Twitter users in late 2017
Bail, C. A., Guay, B., Maloney, E., Combs, A., Hillygus, D. S., Merhout, F., Freelon, D., & Volfovsky, A. (2020) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1906420116 · Cited by 224
Facebooking It to the Polls: A Study in Online Social Networking and Political Behavior
Bode, L. (2012) · Journal of Information Technology & Politics · doi:10.1080/19331681.2012.709045 · Cited by 192
DO THE FACTS SPEAK FOR THEMSELVES? PARTISAN DISAGREEMENT AS A CHALLENGE TO DEMOCRATIC COMPETENCE
Shapiro, R. Y., & Bloch‐Elkon, Y. (2008) · Critical Review · doi:10.1080/08913810802316373 · Cited by 178
The Inseparability of Race and Partisanship in the United States
Westwood, S. J., & Peterson, E. (2022) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11109-020-09648-9 · Cited by 108
Through the Grapevine: Informational Consequences of Interpersonal Political Communication
CARLSON, T. N. (2019) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s000305541900008x · Cited by 95
Political Chameleons: An Exploration of Conformity in Political Discussions
Carlson, T. N., & Settle, J. E. (2016) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11109-016-9335-y · Cited by 74
Inside the Mental Voting Booth: An Impression-Driven Process Model of Candidate Evaluation
Lodge, M., & Stroh, P. (1993) · Explorations in Political Psychology · doi:10.1215/9780822396697-011 · Cited by 66
Political Deepfakes Are As Credible As Other Fake Media And (Sometimes) Real Media
Barari, S., Lucas, C., & Munger, K. (2021) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/cdfh3 · Cited by 51
Republicans and Climate Change: An Audience Analysis of Predictors for Belief and Policy Preferences
Rolfe-Redding, J., Maibach, E. W., Feldman, L., & Leiserowitz, A. (2012) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.2026002 · Cited by 15

Authors: Smith, D., Berelson, B. R., Lazarsfeld, P. F., & McPhee, W. N.
Venue: The American Catholic Sociological Review
Publisher: JSTOR
Published: 1955-03
Volume: 16
Issue: 1
Pages: 73
ISSN: 0362-515X (ISSN-L)
DOI: 10.2307/3709070
OpenAlex: W4302386116
Cited by: 1,093
References: 0
FWCI: 18.97
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review