Cited by 105Diabetes and associated disordersDiabetes Management and ResearchBirth, Development, and Health

Association of Type 1 Diabetes With Month of Birth Among U.S. Youth

Open access
Kahn, Henry S., Morgan, Timothy M., Case, L. Douglas, Dabelea, Dana, Mayer-Davis, Elizabeth J., Lawrence, Jean M., Marcovina, Santica M., Imperatore, Giuseppina +1 more·2009·Diabetes Care

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Seasonal environment at birth may influence diabetes incidence in later life. We sought evidence for this effect in a large sample of diabetic youth residing in the U.S. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We compared the distribution of birth months within the SEARCH for Diabetes in Youth Study (SEARCH study) with the monthly distributions in U.S. births tabulated by race for years 1982–2005. SEARCH study participants (9,737 youth with type 1 diabetes and 1,749 with type 2 diabetes) were identified by six collaborating U.S. centers. RESULTS: Among type 1 diabetic youth, the percentage of observed to expected births differed across the months (P = 0.0092; decreased in October–February and increased in March–July). Their smoothed birth-month estimates demonstrated a deficit in November–February births and an excess in April–July births (smoothed May versus January relative risk [RR] = 1.06 [95% CI 1.02–1.11]). Stratifications by sex or by three racial groups showed similar patterns relating type 1 diabetes to month of birth. Stratification by geographic regions showed a peak-to-nadir RR of 1.10 [1.04–1.16] in study regions from the northern latitudes (Colorado, western Washington State, and southern Ohio) but no birth-month effect (P > 0.9) in study regions from more southern locations. Among type 2 diabetic youth, associations with birth month were inconclusive. CONCLUSIONS: Spring births were associated with increased likelihood of type 1 diabetes but possibly not in all U.S. regions. Causal mechanisms may involve factors dependent on geographic latitude such as solar irradiance, but it is unknown whether they influence prenatal or early postnatal development.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2337/dc09-0891

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Being born in the spring is associated with a higher chance of having type 1 diabetes.

    “and being born in the spring is associated with a higher chance of having type 1 diabetes.8”

    From Type 1 diabetes (2014) · cites this paper as [8]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kahn, H. S., Morgan, T. M., Case, L. D., Dabelea, D., Mayer-Davis, E. J., Lawrence, J. M., Marcovina, S. M., Imperatore, G., & for the SEARCH for Diabetes in Youth Study Group
Affiliations
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US)
  • Wake Forest University Health Sciences (US)
  • Colorado School of Public Health (US)
  • Center for Research in Nutrition and Health Disparities, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, and Department of Nutrition, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina;
  • Kaiser Permanente (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
Corresponding author
Kahn, Henry S.
Venue
Diabetes Care
Published
2009-08-12
Volume
32
Issue
11
Pages
2010-2015
ISSN
  • 0149-5992 (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-5548
OpenAlex
W2020532282
Cited by
105
References
25
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 8
FWCI
4.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Diabetes Care (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • American Diabetes Association
  • U.S. Public Health Service (00097)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (P30DK067629)
  • National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion (U01 DP-000247, U01-DP000246, U01-DP-000250, U01-DP-000254, U01DP000245, U01 DP000248, DP-05069, U01DP000244)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Diabetes and associated disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Birth, Development, and Health
Keywords
type 1 diabetes, type 2 diabetes, birth month, season of birth, youth, SEARCH for Diabetes in Youth, latitude, solar irradiance, prenatal development, postnatal development, racial differences
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Child, Child, Preschool, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Female, Humans, Male, Seasons, United States, Prevalence, Racial Groups

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review