The DOI matches its Crossref record; 52 of the 53 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Improving the Clinical Value and Utility of CGM Systems: Issues and Recommendations
Open accessAbstract
The first systems for continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) became available over 15 years ago. Many then believed CGM would revolutionize the use of intensive insulin therapy in diabetes; however, progress toward that vision has been gradual. Although increasing, the proportion of individuals using CGM rather than conventional systems for self-monitoring of blood glucose on a daily basis is still low in most parts of the world. Barriers to uptake include cost, measurement reliability (particularly with earlier-generation systems), human factors issues, lack of a standardized format for displaying results, and uncertainty on how best to use CGM data to make therapeutic decisions. This Scientific Statement makes recommendations for systemic improvements in clinical use and regulatory (pre- and postmarketing) handling of CGM devices. The aim is to improve safety and efficacy in order to support the advancement of the technology in achieving its potential to improve quality of life and health outcomes for more people with diabetes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“In many countries, the benefits and utility of CGM are now recognized by national and international medical organizations for individuals with insulin-requiring diabetes and/or those at risk for hypoglycemia (16-21).”
From Clinical Targets for Continuous Glucose Monitoring Data Interpretation: Recommendations From the International Consensus on Time in Range (2019) · cites this paper as [19]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
McCambridge, J., Witton, J., & Elbourne, D. R. (2014) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.08.015 · Cited by 2,748
Continuous glucose monitoring and intensive treatment of type 1 diabetes
(2008) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa0805017 · Cited by 1,559
Beck, R. W., Riddlesworth, T., Ruedy, K., Ahmann, A., Bergenstal, R., Haller, S., Kollman, C., Kruger, D., McGill, J. B., Polonsky, W., et al. (2017) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2016.19975 · Cited by 1,185
Self-citationBolinder, J., Antuna, R., Geelhoed-Duijvestijn, P., Kröger, J., & Weitgasser, R. (2016) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(16)31535-5 · Cited by 893
Continuous Glucose Monitoring: A Review of Successes, Challenges, and Opportunities
Rodbard, D. (2016) · Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1089/dia.2015.0417 · Cited by 768
Threshold-based insulin-pump interruption for reduction of hypoglycemia
Bergenstal, R. M., Klonoff, D. C., Garg, S. K., Bode, B. W., Meredith, M., Slover, R. H., Ahmann, A. J., Welsh, J. B., Lee, S. W., & Kaufman, F. R. (2013) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1303576 · Cited by 652
Self-citationSafety of a hybrid closed-loop insulin delivery system in patients with type 1 diabetes
Bergenstal, R. M., Garg, S., Weinzimer, S. A., Buckingham, B. A., Bode, B. W., Tamborlane, W. V., & Kaufman, F. R. (2016) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2016.11708 · Cited by 644
Self-citationHaak, T., Hanaire, H., Ajjan, R., Hermanns, N., Riveline, J.-P., & Rayman, G. (2017) · Diabetes Therapy · doi:10.1007/s13300-016-0223-6 · Cited by 623
International Hypoglycaemia Study Group (2017) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc16-2215 · Cited by 608
Pickup, J. C., Freeman, S. C., & Sutton, A. J. (2011) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.d3805 · Cited by 541
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Battelino, T., Danne, T., Bergenstal, R. M., Amiel, S. A., Beck, R., Biester, T., Bosi, E., Buckingham, B. A., Cefalu, W. T., Close, K. L., et al. (2019) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dci19-0028 · Cited by 4,237
Self-citationMaiorino, M. I., Signoriello, S., Maio, A., Chiodini, P., Bellastella, G., Scappaticcio, L., Longo, M., Giugliano, D., & Esposito, K. (2020) · Diabetes Care · doi:10.2337/dc19-1459 · Cited by 364
Glycemic variability: adverse clinical outcomes and how to improve it?
Zhou, Z. G., Sun, B., Huang, S., Zhu, C., & Bian, M. (2020) · Cardiovascular Diabetology · doi:10.1186/s12933-020-01085-6 · Cited by 273
Review of methods for detecting glycemic disorders
Bergman, M., Abdul‐Ghani, M. A., DeFronzo, R. A., Manco, M., Sesti, G., Fiorentino, T. V., Ceriello, A., Rhee, M. K., Phillips, L. S., Chung, S. T., et al. (2020) · Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice · doi:10.1016/j.diabres.2020.108233 · Cited by 210
Didyuk, O., Econom, N., Guardia, A., Livingston, K., & Klueh, U. (2021) · Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology · doi:10.1177/1932296819899394 · Cited by 175
Metadata
- Authors
- Petrie, J. R., Peters, A. L., Bergenstal, R. M., Holl, R. W., Fleming, G. A., & Heinemann, L.
- Affiliations
- University of Glasgow (GB)
- University of Southern California (US)
- Park Nicollet Health Services (US)
- Universität Ulm (DE)
- Kinexum, Harpers Ferry, WV
- Science & Co, Dusseldorf, Germany
- Corresponding author
- Petrie, John R.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Diabetes Care
- Publisher
- American Diabetes Association
- Published
- 2017-10-25
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1614-1621
- ISSN
- 0149-5992 (ISSN-L)
- 1935-5548
- OpenAlex
- W2766548367
- Cited by
- 135
- References
- 53
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 1
- FWCI
- 2.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Diabetes Care (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) (acceptedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
- Keywords
- continuous glucose monitoring, diabetes management, intensive insulin therapy, measurement reliability, human factors, regulatory oversight, self-monitoring of blood glucose
- MeSH terms
- Blood Glucose, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Europe, Humans, Insulin, Insulin Infusion Systems, Quality of Life, Societies, Medical, United States, Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring, Meta-Analysis as Topic, Reproducibility of Results, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review