Cited by 70Diabetes Management and ResearchDiabetes Management and EducationDiabetes Treatment and Management

Personal continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) in diabetes management: Review of the literature and implementation for practical use

Joubert, M., Reznik, Y.·2012·Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice

Abstract

Aim Despite recent advances in diabetes therapy including the new long- and rapid-insulin analogs, insulin intensification strategies such as basal/bolus or pump therapy and sophisticated methods for insulin titration derived from the principles of functional insulin therapy, many patients fail to reach or maintain target glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) values, putting them at increased risk for vascular complications. Continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) systems represent an important advance in diabetes technology that can facilitate optimal glucose control in type 1 diabetes.Method This review focuses on the efficacy and safety of CGM systems in diabetes management. The different CGM devices available are also described, as the way to use them and the educational approach to the patient in a step-by-step progression toward optimal glycemic control.Results In type 1 diabetes, CGM systems are associated with 0.5-1% reduction in HbA1c without increased risk of hypoglycemia. CGM efficacy correlates with compliance to sensor wear, whatever the patient's age range.Conclusion Efficacy of CGM systems is now proven but indications, terms of use and educational issues of this new technology still need to be specified.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.diabres.2011.12.010

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Type 2 diabetes requires constant monitoring and management due to the mechanism of the disease and its implications on the body's energy expenditure.

    “Type 2 diabetes (T2D) is a condition that requires constant monitoring and management due to the mechanism of the disease and its implications on the body’s energy expenditure2.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Joubert, M., & Reznik, Y.
Affiliations
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Caen Normandie (FR)
Venue
Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-06
Volume
96
Issue
3
Pages
294-305
ISSN
0168-8227 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1993959942
Cited by
70
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 4
FWCI
0.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
Keywords
continuous glucose monitoring, type 1 diabetes, glycemic control, HbA1c, hypoglycemia, patient education, diabetes technology, insulin therapy, functional insulin therapy
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Blood Glucose, Child, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Female, Glycated Hemoglobin, Humans, Hypoglycemia, Hypoglycemic Agents, Insulin, Insulin Infusion Systems, Male, Middle Aged, Quality of Life, Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring, Monitoring, Ambulatory, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review