Cited by 642Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive PhysiologyAnaerobic Digestion and Biogas ProductionAnimal Nutrition and Physiology

The role of ciliate protozoa in the rumen

Open access
Newbold, Charles J., de la Fuente, Gabriel, Belanche, Alejandro, Ramos-Morales, Eva, McEwan, Neil R.·2015·Frontiers in Microbiology

Abstract

First described in 1843, Rumen protozoa with their striking appearance were assumed to be important for the welfare of their host. However, despite contributing up to 50% of the bio-mass in the rumen, the role of protozoa in rumen microbial ecosystem remains unclear. Phylogenetic analysis of 18S rDNA libraries generated from the rumen of cattle, sheep, and goats has revealed an unexpected diversity of ciliated protozoa although variation in gene copy number between species makes it difficult to obtain absolute quantification. Despite repeated attempts it has proven impossible to maintain rumen protozoa in axenic culture. Thus it has been difficult to establish conclusively a role of ciliate protozoa in rumen fiber degradation. The development of techniques to clone and express ciliate genes in λ phage, together with bioinformatic indices to confirm the ciliate origin of the genes has allowed the isolation and characterization of fibrolytic genes from rumen protozoa. Elimination of the ciliate protozoa increases microbial protein supply by up to 30% and reduces methane production by up to 11%. Our recent findings suggest that holotrich protozoa play a disproportionate role in supporting methanogenesis whilst the small Entodinium are responsible for much of the bacterial protein turnover. As yet no method to control protozoa in the rumen that is safe and practically applicable has been developed, however a range of plant extract capable of controlling if not completely eliminating rumen protozoa have been described.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fmicb.2015.01313

Cites

162 of 162 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Rumen bacteria play a dominant role in fiber digestion, although anaerobic fungi and protozoa contribute to lignocellulose breakdown by attacking lignocellulosic material differently and discharging different enzyme complexes.

    “Rumen bacteria play a dominant role in fiber digestion, although anaerobic fungi and protozoa have been reported to contribute to lignocellulose breakdown by attacking lignocellulosic material differently (60, 64) and discharging different enzyme complexes (101).”

    From Phytogenic Additives Can Modulate Rumen Microbiome to Mediate Fermentation Kinetics and Methanogenesis Through Exploiting Diet–Microbe Interaction (2020) · cites this paper as [64]

    Citation (101) is attached to the claim about discharging different enzyme complexes. The ‘Functional Genes in Rumen Ciliate Protozoa’ section reports a wide range of protozoal fibrolytic enzymes, but does not establish that fungi and protozoa discharge different enzyme complexes. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Defaunation reduces methane output by approximately 11%.

    “protozoa have been linked to methanogenesis as defaunation reduces methane output by approximately 11% (Hegarty, 1999; Morgavi et al., 2010; Newbold et al., 2015).”
  • Removal of protozoa from the rumen causes a decrease in organic matter degradation, especially of neutral and acid detergent fiber.

    “Based on their analysis, Newbold and colleagues found evidence that the removal of protozoa from the rumen caused a decrease in organic matter degradation, especially of neutral and acid detergent fiber.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 163 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Dehority B. A. (1993). Laboratory Manual for Classification and Morphology of Ruminal Ciliate Protozoa. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
  2. Frumholtz P. P. (1991). Manipulation of the Rumen Fermentation and its Effect on Digestive Physiology. Ph.D. thesis, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen.
  3. Ramos-Morales E. de la Fuente G. Nash R. Preskett D. Newbold C. J. (2014). “In vitro effect of the combination of Ivy fruit refined extract and a glucosidase inhibitor on rumen fermentation and protozoa activity,” in Proceedings of Rowett-INRA 2014, Gut Microbiology: From Sequence To Function, Aberdeen, p 116.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Newbold, C. J., de la Fuente, G., Belanche, A., Ramos-Morales, E., & McEwan, N. R.
Affiliations
Aberystwyth University (GB)
Corresponding author
Newbold, Charles J.
Venue
Frontiers in Microbiology
Published
2015-11-26
Volume
6
Pages
1313-1313
ISSN
1664-302X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2177858583
Cited by
637
References
163
Citations by year
2026: 70 · 2025: 67 · 2024: 71 · 2023: 84 · 2022: 81 · 2021: 65 · 2020: 63 · 2019: 46 · 2018: 45 · 2017: 36 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 1
FWCI
5.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Frontiers in Microbiology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • RECERCAT (Consorci de Serveis Universitaris de Catalunya) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • UdL Open Repository (University of Lleida) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Open Access Institutional Repository at Robert Gordon University (Robert Gordon University) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Open Access Institutional Repository at Robert Gordon University (Robert Gordon University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BB/J0013/1)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Nutrition and Physiology
Keywords
rumen ciliate protozoa, rumen microbiota, 18S rDNA phylogeny, Entodinium, methanogenesis, methane mitigation, microbial protein supply, plant extracts, cattle, sheep, goats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review