Cited by 8Circadian rhythm and melatoninBipolar Disorder and TreatmentSleep and Wakefulness Research

Protein Kinase C Activity and Delayed Recovery of Sleep-Wake Cycle in Mouse Model of Bipolar Disorder

Open access
Moon, Eunsoo, Choe, Byeong-Moo, Park, Je-Min, Chung, Young In, Lee, Byung Dae, Park, Jae-Hong, Lee, Young Min, Jeong, Hee Jeong +3 more·2018·Psychiatry Investigation

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Previous studies reported the delayed recovery group after circadian rhythm disruption in mice showed higher quinpiroleinduced locomotor activity. This study aimed to compare not only Protein Kinase C (PKC) activities in frontal, striatal, hippocampus and cerebellum, but also relative PKC activity ratios among brain regions according to recovery of circadian rhythm. METHODS: The circadian rhythm disruption protocol was applied to eight-week-old twenty male Institute Cancer Research mice. The circadian rhythm recovery patterns were collected through motor activities measured by Mlog system. Depressive and manic proneness were examined by forced swim test and quinpirole-induced open field test respectively. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay was employed to measure PKC activities. RESULTS: The delayed recovery group presented greater locomotor activities than the early recovery group (p=0.033). The delayed recovery group had significantly lower frontal PKC activity than the other (p=0.041). The former showed lower frontal/cerebellar PKC activity ratio (p=0.047) but higher striatal/frontal (p=0.038) and hippocampal/frontal (p=0.007) PKC activities ratios than the latter. CONCLUSION: These findings support potential mechanism of delayed recovery after circadian disruption in bipolar animal model could be an alteration of relative PKC activities among mood regulation related brain regions. It is required to investigate the PKC downstream signaling related to the delayed recovery pattern.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.30773/pi.2018.05.23

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Studies on circadian disruption in ICR mice by inverting the light-dark cycle for 3 days reported that approximately half of the mice fail to recover normal sleep-wake cycles within 6 days after re-exposure to normal lighting conditions.

    “Studies on circadian disruption in ICR mice, by inverting the LD cycle for 3 days, have reported that approximately half of the mice fail to recover normal sleep-wake cycles within 6 days after re-exposure to normal lighting conditions.”

    From Circadian rhythm disruption and mental health (2020) · cites this paper as [138]

    The Methods (Animals and Experimental procedure; page numbers unavailable) confirm that ICR mice underwent an inverted light–dark cycle. But the inversion lasted two weeks, not three days, and the recovery times were measured before the return to normal lighting. The Methods (Measurements) report that 85% recovered within six days, not that approximately half failed to recover by then. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Mice that took longer to re-entrain normal sleep-wake rhythms after circadian disruption also displayed greater quinpirole-induced hyperactivity, indicative of a more mania-like state, however depressive-like behavior (forced swim test) was not affected.

    “The mice that took longer to re-entrain normal sleep-wake rhythms after circadian disruption also displayed greater quinpirole-induced hyperactivity, indicative of a more mania-like state, however depressive-like behavior (forced swim test) was not affected137,138.”

    From Circadian rhythm disruption and mental health (2020) · cites this paper as [138]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Moon, E., Choe, B.-M., Park, J.-M., Chung, Y. I., Lee, B. D., Park, J.-H., Lee, Y. M., Jeong, H. J., Cheon, Y., Choi, Y., & Park, J.
Affiliations
  • Pusan National University Hospital (KR)
  • Dong-A University (KR)
  • Pusan National University (KR)
Corresponding author
Park, Je-Min
Venue
Psychiatry Investigation
Published
2018-09-25
Volume
15
Issue
9
Pages
907-913
ISSN
  • 1738-3684 (ISSN-L)
  • 1976-3026
OpenAlex
W2890138246
Cited by
8
References
46
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3
FWCI
0.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychiatry Investigation (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Circadian rhythm and melatonin
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
Keywords
protein kinase C, circadian rhythm disruption, bipolar disorder, depression-like behavior, manic-like behavior, frontal cortex, striatum, hippocampus, cerebellum, mood regulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review