Cited by 2,734Innovative Teaching and Learning MethodsIntelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive LearningLearning Styles and Cognitive Differences

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 25 of the 25 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The 2 Sigma Problem: The Search for Methods of Group Instruction as Effective as One-to-One Tutoring

BLOOM, BENJAMIN S.·1984·Educational Researcher

Abstract

T w o University of Chicago doctoral students in education, Anania (1982, 1983) and Burke (1984), completed dissertations in which they compared student learning under the following three conditions of instruction: 1. Conventional. Students learn the subject matter in a class with about 30 students per teacher. Tests are given periodically for marking the students. 2. Mastery Learning. Students learn the subject matter in a class with about 30 students per teacher. The instruction is the same as in the conventional class (usually with the same teacher). Formative tests (the same tests used with the conventional group) are given for feedback followed by corrective procedures and parallel formative tests to determine the extent to which the students have mastered the subject matter. 3. Tutoring. Students learn the subject matter with a good tutor for each student (or for two or three students simultaneously). This tutoring instruction is followed periodically by formative tests, feedback-corrective procedures, and parallel formative tests as in the mastery learning classes. It should be pointed out that the need for corrective work under tutoring is very small.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3102/0013189x013006004

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 25 references

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. Anania J, 1982, Dissertation Abstracts International, 42, 4269A
  2. Bloom BS, 1980, Phi Delta Kappan, 61, 6
  3. Burke AJ, 1984, Dissertation Abstracts International, 44, 2025A
  4. DaveRHThe identification and measurement of environment process variables that are related to educational achievement1963(Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Chicago)
  5. DolanLJThe affective correlates of home concern and support, instructional quality, and achievement1980(Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Chicago)
  6. JanhomSEducating parents to educate their children1983(Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Chicago)
  7. Leyton FS, 1983, Dissertation Abstracts International, 44, 974A
  8. MevarechZRThe role of teaching-learning strategies and feed-back-corrective procedures in developing higher cognitive achievement1980(Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Chicago)
  9. NordinABThe effects of different qualities of instruction on selected cognitive, affective, and time variables1979(Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Chicago)
  10. Nordin AB, 1980, Evaluation: in Education: An International Review Series, 4, 2
  11. Tenenbaum G, 1982, Dissertation Abstracts International, 43, 1822A
  12. WolfRMThe identification and measurement of home environmental process variables that are related to intelligence1964(Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Chicago)
  13. Wolf RM, 1966, Testing Problems in Perspective

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 901–1,000 of 1,005

Metadata

Authors
BLOOM, B. S.
Affiliations
Northwestern University (US)
Corresponding author
BLOOM, BENJAMIN S.
Venue
Educational Researcher
Published
1984-06
Volume
13
Issue
6
Pages
4-16
ISSN
  • 0013-189X (ISSN-L)
  • 1935-102X
OpenAlex
W2172010324
Cited by
2,734
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 195 · 2025: 144 · 2024: 131 · 2023: 99 · 2022: 103 · 2021: 84 · 2020: 129 · 2019: 88 · 2018: 122 · 2017: 79 · 2016: 97 · 2015: 119 · 2014: 112 · 2013: 107 · 2012: 103
FWCI
39.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Educational Researcher (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Learning Styles and Cognitive Differences
Keywords
group instruction, one-on-one tutoring, learning mastery, conventional instruction, corrective procedures, academic performance, tutoring effectiveness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review