The DOI matches its Crossref record; 49 of the 49 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The instructional effect of feedback in test-like events.
Abstract
Feedback is an essential construct for many theories of learning and instruction, and an understanding of the conditions for effective feedback should facilitate both theoretical development and instructional practice. In an early review of feedback effects in written instruction, Kulhavy (1977) proposed that feedback’s chief instructional significance is to correct errors. This error-correcting action was thought to be a function of presentation timing, response certainty, and whether students could merely copy answers from feedback without having to generate their own. The present meta-analysis reviewed 58 effect sizes from 40 reports. Feedback effects were found to vary with control for presearch availability, type of feedback, use of pretests, and type of instruction and could be quite large under optimal conditions. Mediated intentional feedback for retrieval and application of specific knowledge appears to stimulate the correction of erroneous responses in situations where its mindful ( Salomon & Globerson, 1987 ) reception is encouraged.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Previous meta-analyses have produced inconsistent results of feedback on cognitive variables (Kulik and Kulik, 1988; Bangert-Drowns et al., 1991; Azevedo and Bernard, 1995; Kluger and DeNisi, 1996; Lyster and Saito, 2010) and significant heterogeneity remains within the sub-group defined by this moderator in our analysis.”
From The Power of Feedback Revisited: A Meta-Analysis of Educational Feedback Research (2020) · cites this paper as Bangert-Drowns et al., 1991
Citations
Cites
From dissertation abstracts international
(1974) · ACM SIGGRAPH Computer Graphics · doi:10.1145/988616.988619 · Cited by 12,208
Handbook of research on teaching
Wittrock, M. C. (1986) · Bibliothèque et Archives nationales du Québec (Québec government) · Cited by 10,630
Pierce, W. D., & Bandura, A. (1977) · The Canadian Journal of Sociology · doi:10.2307/3340496 · Cited by 9,742
Meta-analysis in social research
(1982) · Evaluation and Program Planning · doi:10.1016/0149-7189(82)90011-8 · Cited by 3,896
The role of expectations and attributions in the alleviation of learned helplessness.
Dweck, C. S. (1975) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0077149 · Cited by 1,315
Cognitive Conceptions of Learning
Shuell, T. J. (1986) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543056004411 · Cited by 1,177
Timing of feedback and verbal learning.
Kulik, J. A., & Kulik, C.-L. C. (1988) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543058001079 · Cited by 703
Self-citationFeedback in written instruction: The place of response certitude
Kulhavy, R. W., & Stock, W. (1989) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/bf01320096 · Cited by 579
Feedback in Written Instruction
Kulhavy, R. W. (1977) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543047002211 · Cited by 571 · cited 7×
“Reviewing research on feedback effects in written instruction, Kulhavy (1977) generated four propositions.”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialStudent Interaction and Learning in Small Groups
Webb, N. M. (1982) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543052003421 · Cited by 494
Research works printed but not linked: 26
- Anane FJK, 1987, Dissertation Abstracts International, 48, 2831A
- Arnett PP, 1985, Dissertation Abstracts International, 46, 2537A
- Aumiller LE, 1963, Dissertation Abstracts International, 24, 5187
- Brown RS, 1964, Dissertation Abstracts International, 24, 2356
- Bumgarner KM, 1984, Dissertation Abstracts International, 45, 1102A
- Carels EJ, 1975, Dissertation Abstracts International, 36, 2094A
- Chanond K, 1988, Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology
- Clark RE, 1987, Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association
- Clodfelder DL, 1968, Dissertation Abstracts International, 29, 2217B
- Csikszentmihalyi M, 1978, The hidden costs of reward, 205
- Elliot BA, 1986, Dissertation Abstracts International, 47, 2971A
- Gherfal IR, 1982, Dissertation Abstracts International, 43, 147A
- Heald HM, 1970, Dissertation Abstracts International, 31, 1621A
- Hirsch RS, 1952, The effects of knowledge of test results on learning meaningful material
- Hoffman BS, 1974, Dissertation Abstracts International, 35, 6006A
- Hough JB, 1963, Phi Delta Kappan, 44, 286
- Hyman C, 1981, Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Northeastern Educational Research Association
- Hymel GM, 1980, Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association
- Miechenbaum D, 1985, Thinking and learning skills, Vol. 2: Research and open questions
- Olson GH, 1971, Dissertation Abstracts International, 32, 6214A
- Pressey SL, 1926, School and Society, 23, 373
- Schimmel BJ, 1983, Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association
- Shuell TJ, 1980, Aptitude, learning, and instruction. Vol. 2: Cognitive process analyses of learning and problem-solving, 277
- Snow RE, 1972, Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association
- Tobias S, 1984, Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association
- Tsao PK, 1977, Dissertation Abstracts International, 39, 1426A
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 801–900 of 1,000
Effects of a Data-Driven District Reform Model on State Assessments
Slavin, R. E., Cheung, A., & Holmes, G. (2011) · Cited by 4
Does Computer-based Elaborated Feedback Influence the Students’ Question-Answering Process?
Máñez, I., Gámez, E. V.-A., & Martínez, T. (2019) · Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology · doi:10.25115/ejrep.v17i47.2156 · Cited by 4
The Effect of Feedback Timing on Mathematics Achievement
Yaşar, C., & Akbaş, U. (2019) · İlköğretim Online · doi:10.17051/ilkonline.2019.630657 · Cited by 4
Learning from feedback in college courses: Student beliefs, practices, and preferences
Zepeda, C. D., Ortegren, F. R., & Butler, A. C. (2023) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.4118 · Cited by 4
Schreurs, D. G., Trate, J. M., Srinivasan, S., Teichert, M. A., Luxford, C. J., Schneider, J. L., & Murphy, K. L. (2024) · Chemistry Education Research and Practice · doi:10.1039/d3rp00204g · Cited by 4
Lachman, N. (2014) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-08930-0_17 · Cited by 5
Imam, B. M., Rafiq, M. I., & Kumar, P. (2011) · European Journal of Higher Education · doi:10.1080/21568235.2011.601932 · Cited by 4
Dollár, A., & Steif, P. S. (2020) · ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition · doi:10.18260/1-2--16094 · Cited by 4
Contradictions Resolved: An Analysis of Two Theories of the Achievement Gap
Yeh, S. S. (2017) · Teachers College Record The Voice of Scholarship in Education · doi:10.1177/016146811711900603 · Cited by 4
Hild, P., Buff, A., Gut, C., & Parchmann, I. (2020) · Zeitschrift für Didaktik der Naturwissenschaften · doi:10.1007/s40573-020-00109-8 · Cited by 11
Effective Feedback Conversations in Clinical Practice
Johnson, C., Watling, C., Keating, J. L., & Molloy, E. (2020) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-13-6106-7_53-1 · Cited by 6
Student Consistency and Implications for Feedback in Online Assessment Systems.
Madhyastha, T. M., & Tanimoto, S. L. (2009) · Educational Data Mining · Cited by 4
Learning stoichiometry: A comparison of text and multimedia instructional formats
Evans, K. L. (2007) · Cited by 4
A Review of the Studies on the Frequent Administrations of English Tests
Ramshe, M. H. (2014) · Journal of Language Teaching and Research · doi:10.4304/jltr.5.6.1412-1416 · Cited by 4
Spector, J. M. (2008) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-74155-8_14 · Cited by 4
Exploring learning how to learn in a team-based engineering education
Ifenthaler, D., Siddique, Z., & Mistree, F. (2014) · Interactive Technology and Smart Education · doi:10.1108/itse-10-2013-0025 · Cited by 4
Assessment in Science: The Development and Evaluation of a Video Assessment in Physics
Lawrence, M. J., O’Donnell, A. M., & Pallrand, G. J. (1994) · Educational Assessment · doi:10.1207/s15326977ea0204_1 · Cited by 4
Martin, A. J. (2014) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-08759-7_5 · Cited by 4
Findings Matrix: What Works in Adult Training
Montague, W., & Knirk, F. G. (1993) · International Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.1016/0883-0355(93)90006-6 · Cited by 6
Besser, M., & Leiß, D. (2014) · Multilingual Matters (Channel View Publications) · Cited by 4
Salihu, L., Aro, M. T., & Räsänen, P. (2017) · Hrvatska revija za rehabilitacijska istraživanja · doi:10.31299/hrri.53.2.9 · Cited by 4
Welche Rückmeldungen wirken am besten?
Ropohl, M., & Scheuermann, H. (2018) · Zeitschrift für Didaktik der Naturwissenschaften · doi:10.1007/s40573-018-0080-0 · Cited by 4
Sayed, S., & Curabba, B. (2020) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-25830-6_4 · Cited by 4
Situated learning designs for professional development: fundamental principles and case studies
Naidu, S. (2024) · Swinburne figshare (Swinburne University of Technology) · doi:10.25916/sut.26292916 · Cited by 4
Designing for Learning: Multiplayer Digital Game Learning Environments
Kim, C. O. (2010) · eScholarship (California Digital Library) · Cited by 4
Influences on Mothers' Use of Clinician Help in the Infants' First Three Months
Pridham, K. F., Chang, A. S., & Chiu, Y. (1994) · Public Health Nursing · doi:10.1111/j.1525-1446.1994.tb00773.x · Cited by 4
Girasoli, A. J. (2016) · OpenCommons - UConn (University of Connecticut) · Cited by 4
Implementing and managing self assessment procedures
Armstrong, T. (2013) · doi:10.31390/gradschool_theses.3636 · Cited by 6
Perumanathan, P. S. (2014) · Open Access Victoria University of Wellington | Te Herenga Waka (Figshare) · doi:10.26686/wgtn.17006677 · Cited by 4
Daumiller, M. H., & Meyer, J. (2025) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/zfxe6_v3 · Cited by 4
PLYBOUR, C. (2015) · ScholarWorks - WMU (Western Michigan University) · Cited by 4
Hybrid Intelligence Feedback: A Model Proposal and Preliminary Study
Coşkun, A., & Er, E. (2026) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1002/jcal.70212 · Cited by 3
Honestya, G., Sajida, M., & Ramadhanu, A. (2024) · Journal of Information System and Education Development · doi:10.62386/jised.v2i1.59 · Cited by 3
Supporting comprehension: The advantages of multiple–choice over true—false practice tests
Hildenbrand, L., & Wiley, J. (2025) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/s13421-025-01726-9 · Cited by 3
Holster, J. L., Corsun-Ascher, C., Olivier, T. W., & Golden, C. J. (2012) · NSUWorks (Nova Southeastern University) · Cited by 3
A CASE STUDY OF FORMATIVE ASSESSMENT IN A CHINESE HIGH SCHOOL
Tang, Y. (2013) · Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics · doi:10.17509/ijal.v2i2.166 · Cited by 3
SCIENCE TALK IN THE SECONDARY CLASSROOMS: ANALYSIS OF TEACHERS’ FEEDBACK
Siddiquee, M. N.-E.-A., & Ikeda, H. (2013) · European Scientific Journal ESJ · Cited by 3
Souter, D. H. (2022) · Digital Archive @ GSU · doi:10.57709/1348501 · Cited by 3
A Meta-analytic Synthesis: Examining the Academic Impacts of Feedback on Student Achievement
Baliram, N. S., & Youde, J. J. (2018) · International Dialogues on Education Journal · doi:10.53308/ide.v5i2.72 · Cited by 3
Using a Non-player Character to Improve Training Outcomes for Submarine Electronic Warfare Operators
Schroeder, B. L., Fraulini, N. W., Buskirk, W. L. V., & Johnson, C. I. (2020) · Lecture notes in computer science · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-50788-6_39 · Cited by 3
Understanding and Cultivating Hope in School
Dixson, D. D. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108235532.014 · Cited by 3
Looking Closely at Mathematics and Science Classroom Feedback Practices
Ruiz‐Primo, M. A., & Kroog, H. (2018) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316832134.011 · Cited by 4
Amini, M. A., Kruger, C. G., & Nel, C. (2022) · System · doi:10.1016/j.system.2022.102919 · Cited by 3
Spaced Retrieval Practice in Two Fundamental Engineering Courses: Calculus and Physics
Patrick, R. J., Bego, C. R., Chastain, R. J., Ralston, P. A. S., Immekus, J. C., & Lyle, K. B. (2022) · IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE) · doi:10.1109/fie56618.2022.9962526 · Cited by 5
Perceived control decisions in preparation for a summative achievement test in higher education
van der Linden, J., van Schilt-Mol, T., Nieuwenhuis, L. F. M., & van der Vleuten, C. P. M. (2023) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2022.1043238 · Cited by 3
Digitale Schreibförderung im Bildungskontext: Ein systematisches Review
Fleckenstein, J., Reble, R., Meyer, J., Jansen, T., Liebenow, L. W., Møller, J., & Köller, O. (2023) · Edition ZfE · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-37895-0_1 · Cited by 3
Computer-marked assessment and concept inventories
Jordan, S. (2023) · Institute of Physics eBooks · doi:10.1088/978-0-7503-5231-4ch6 · Cited by 2
College Students' Responses to Automated Feedback on Self-Regulated Learning
Yu, E. C., Lui, A., Andrade, H., Akhmedjanova, D., Franklin, D., & Bryer, J. (2023) · Educational Assessment · doi:10.1080/10627197.2026.2727839 · Cited by 2
Kim, H., & Song, J. (2023) · Research in Science Education · doi:10.1007/s11165-023-10127-4 · Cited by 5
Eom, S. B., & Ashill, N. J. (2023) · Journal of international technology and information management · doi:10.58729/1941-6679.1557 · Cited by 3
Using a Refutation Text to Increase Dyslexia Knowledge in CSD Undergraduates
Shiver, D., & Krimm, H. (2023) · Teaching and Learning in Communication Sciences & Disorders · doi:10.61403/2689-6443.1292 · Cited by 3
La formule actuelle d’évaluation ministérielle au Nouveau-Brunswick. Pour qui? Pourquoi?
Bourque, J., Lang, M., & Labelle, J. (2014) · Éducation et francophonie · doi:10.7202/1027403ar · Cited by 3
Hoo, H.-T., & Hughes, G. (2017) · Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks · doi:10.1057/978-1-137-56502-0_9 · Cited by 3
Three key factors that influence reading comprehension
Cates-Darnell, D. M. (2002) · CSUSB ScholarWorks (California State University, San Bernardino) · Cited by 3
Relationship between Feedback Types and task persistance: Moderating Effects of Feedback Acceptance
Kam, M. (2017) · Journal of Curriculum and Evaluation · doi:10.29221/jce.2017.20.1.143 · Cited by 3
Feedback Effect on Secondary School Students Achievement in Mathematics
Batool, T., & Akhter, M. (2019) · Global Social Sciences Review · doi:10.31703/gssr.2019(iv-iii).12 · Cited by 4
Hoch- und niedrig-inferente Erfassung von Feedback in der Erzieher_in-Kind-Interaktion
Leber, A., & Kammermeyer, G. (2021) · Frühe Bildung · doi:10.1026/2191-9186/a000529 · Cited by 3
Küçük, T. (2023) · International Journal of Social Sciences and Educational Studies · doi:10.23918/ijsses.v10i3p392 · Cited by 3
Student and Teacher Response System
Avdic, A., Grönberg, P., Olsson, J., & Riveros, F. G. (2013) · World Congress on Information and Communication Technologies · doi:10.1109/wict.2013.7113103 · Cited by 3
Castel, A. G. (2013) · Contextos Educativos Revista de Educación · doi:10.18172/con.612 · Cited by 3
Assessment of Student Learning in Science.
Smith, L. (1993) · Cited by 3
Analyzing Two Assumptions Underlying the Scoring of Classroom Assessments.
Marzano, R. J. (2000) · Cited by 3
Comparing the Utility and Sequencing of Different Types of Feedback
Rhodenizer, L. G., Jentsch, K., Bowers, C. A., Burroughs, W. A., Cannon‐Bowers, J. A., & Eduardo Salas, A. (2001) · Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting · doi:10.1177/154193120104502609 · Cited by 3
The Effects of Study Tasks in a Computer-Based Chemistry Learning Environment
Urhahne, D., Nick, S., Poepping, A. C., & Schulz, S. J. (2013) · Journal of Science Education and Technology · doi:10.1007/s10956-013-9445-9 · Cited by 3
Adoption of Computer-Based Formative Assessment in a High School Mathematics Classroom
Warner, Z. B. (2011) · Journal of Cases on Information Technology · doi:10.4018/jcit.2011100102 · Cited by 3
Effects of Feedback Types on the Student‟s Self-Efficacy
Yang, K.-H. (2013) · International Journal of e-Education e-Business e-Management and e-Learning · doi:10.7763/ijeeee.2013.v3.223 · Cited by 4
Examining the Role of Feedback on Self-efficacy and Performance in Web-based Environment
Wang, S., & Wu, P.-Y. (2007) · International Conference on Innovative Computing, Information and Control · doi:10.1109/icicic.2007.296 · Cited by 3
Examining Characteristics of Teacher Feedback in Organizing Written Texts
Çetinkaya, G. (2015) · Pamukkale University Open Access Archive (Pamukkale University) · Cited by 3
A Study of Feedback Provided to Student Teams Engaged in Open-Ended Projects
Hirshfield, L. J., Whinnery, J. L., Gilbuena, D. M., & Koretsky, M. (2020) · ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition · doi:10.18260/1-2--20003 · Cited by 3
Dollár, A., Ulseth, R., & Steif, P. S. (2020) · ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition · doi:10.18260/1-2--17572 · Cited by 3
Buskirk, W. L. V. (2011) · Journal of International Crisis and Risk Communication Research · Cited by 3
The Potential for Computer Tutors to Assist Students Learning to Solve Complex Problems
Steif, P. S., Fu, L., & Kara, L. B. (2020) · ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition · doi:10.18260/1-2--23172 · Cited by 3
Asking for Feedback: Helping Learners Get the Feedback They Deserve
Mariani, A., Schumann, S.-A., Fromme, H. B., Zegarek, M. H., Swearingen, S., Ryan, M. S., & Reddy, S. T. (2015) · MedEdPORTAL · doi:10.15766/mep_2374-8265.10228 · Cited by 3
Gomes, A., & Mendes, A. J. (2006) · Kluwer Academic Publishers eBooks · doi:10.1007/0-306-47533-2_15 · Cited by 3
Teaching advancement with Phased Assessments and Looped Feedback (PALF) model
Abadi, H. A., Mainali, B., & Lumantarna, E. (2022) · European Journal of Engineering Education · doi:10.1080/03043797.2022.2145937 · Cited by 3
A Teacher's Guide to Giving Effective Feedback
Aasen, A. (2015) · Cited by 3
Salamonson, Y., Everett, B., Koch, J., & Frost, S. A. (2008) · Cited by 3
Written Feedback in the Basic Course: What Instructors Provide and What Students Deem Helpful
Jensen, K. K., & Lamoureux, E. R. (1997) · Basic communication course annual · Cited by 3
Minke, K. M., & Woodford, J. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108235532.030 · Cited by 6
Siddiquee, M. N.-E.-A. (2014) · Hiroshima University Acedemic Information Repository (Hiroshima University) · Cited by 3
Dynamic software enhancing creative mathematical reasoning
Olsson, J. (2014) · KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology) · Cited by 3
Shaikh, K. (2008) · Spectrum Research Repository (Concordia University) · Cited by 3
WANG, W. J. (2011) · VTechWorks (Virginia Tech) · Cited by 3
Examining the Testing Effect Using the Dual-Process Signal Detection Model
Bies-Hernandez, N. J., Copeland, D. E., & Parks, C. M. (2013) · PsycEXTRA Dataset · doi:10.1037/e633262013-918 · Cited by 3
Effect of Performance Feedback on Perceived Knowledge and Likelihood to Pursue Continuing Education
Eberman, L. E. (2008) · doi:10.25148/etd.fi08121904 · Cited by 3
Promoting students' learning through constructive feedback strategies
Rezk, Y. (2021) · Digital Repository Service (Northeastern University) · doi:10.17760/d20409202 · Cited by 3
Lui, A. M. (2020) · Scholars Archive - University at Albany (University at Albany, State University of New York) · doi:10.54014/7mg3-x499 · Cited by 3
School-Based Interventions for Refugee Children and Adolescents
Teja, Z., & Worrell, F. C. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108235532.036 · Cited by 2
Review of Studies on Feedback Types: Systematic Review Study
Dönmez, A., & AYDIN, İ. S. (2023) · Osmangazi Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.59409/ojer.1369117 · Cited by 2
Kuem, J., Kwak, D.-H., & Goel, S. (2025) · Information & Management · doi:10.1016/j.im.2025.104234 · Cited by 2
Sunday, O. J., Adesope, O., Dai, S., & Carbonneau, K. J. (2025) · Learning and Motivation · doi:10.1016/j.lmot.2025.102201 · Cited by 6
Repairing Errors With Elaborative Feedback in Computerised Learning Environments
Martínez, T., García, A., Cerdán, R., & Vidal‐Abarca, E. (2026) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1002/jcal.70199 · Cited by 2
Shaikh, K., Zuberi, A., & Venkatesh, V. (2012) · Revue internationale des technologies en pédagogie universitaire · doi:10.7202/1012899ar · Cited by 2
Boytos, A. S., & Pettijohn, T. F. (2017) · Psi Chi Journal of Psychological Research · doi:10.24839/2325-7342.jn22.4.286 · Cited by 2
The Effects of Peer Tutoring and Feedback on Academic Learning in University Mathematics
최원영 (2018) · Journal of Engineering Education Research · doi:10.18108/jeer.2018.21.1.37 · Cited by 2
Effective Bullying Prevention and Intervention Strategies for School Professionals
Swearer, S. M., Garcia, A. G., Damme, A. M., Palmon, S., Asay, N. J., & Scalora, M. J. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108235532.023 · Cited by 2
Rising to the Challenge: A School Psychology for All Students
Worrell, F. C., Dixson, D. D., & Hughes, T. L. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108235532.037 · Cited by 2
Viswanathan, V. K., Mirza, S., Nayak, C. R., & Calhoun, M. (2020) · ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition · doi:10.18260/1-2--34602 · Cited by 2
Mechanix: An Intelligent Web Interface for Automatic Grading of Sketched Free-Body Diagrams
Runyon, M., Viswanathan, V. K., Talley, K. G., Hammond, T., & Linsey, J. (2024) · ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition · doi:10.18260/1-2--37497 · Cited by 2
Metadata
- Authors
- Bangert-Drowns, R. L., Kulik, C.-L. C., Kulik, J. A., & Morgan, M.
- Affiliations
- State University of New York at Albany
- University of Michigan (US)
- State University of New York (US)
- Venue
- Review of Educational Research
- Published
- 1991-06
- Volume
- 61
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 213-238
- ISSN
- 0034-6543 (ISSN-L)
- 1935-1046
- OpenAlex
- W2171054741
- Semantic Scholar
- 116f5f0b52057e031f446e37ce7746ed5c1306e0
- Cited by
- 1,313
- References
- 48
- Citations by year
- 2026: 19 · 2025: 34 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 51 · 2022: 55 · 2021: 69 · 2020: 116 · 2019: 54 · 2018: 76 · 2017: 57 · 2016: 63 · 2015: 71 · 2014: 75 · 2013: 65 · 2012: 56
- FWCI
- 54.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Review of Educational Research (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
- Keywords
- feedback, error correction, pretest, retrieval practice, knowledge application, response certainty, presentation timing, written instructions
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review