Cited by 1,313Student Assessment and FeedbackInnovative Teaching and Learning MethodsVisual and Cognitive Learning Processes

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 49 of the 49 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The instructional effect of feedback in test-like events.

Bangert-Drowns, Robert L., Kulik, Chen-Lin C., Kulik, James A., Morgan, MaryTeresa·1991·Review of Educational Research

DOI 10.3102/00346543061002213

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Feedback is an essential construct for many theories of learning and instruction, and an understanding of the conditions for effective feedback should facilitate both theoretical development and instructional practice. In an early review of feedback effects in written instruction, Kulhavy (1977) proposed that feedback’s chief instructional significance is to correct errors. This error-correcting action was thought to be a function of presentation timing, response certainty, and whether students could merely copy answers from feedback without having to generate their own. The present meta-analysis reviewed 58 effect sizes from 40 reports. Feedback effects were found to vary with control for presearch availability, type of feedback, use of pretests, and type of instruction and could be quite large under optimal conditions. Mediated intentional feedback for retrieval and application of specific knowledge appears to stimulate the correction of erroneous responses in situations where its mindful ( Salomon & Globerson, 1987 ) reception is encouraged.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3102/00346543061002213

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

From dissertation abstracts international
(1974) · ACM SIGGRAPH Computer Graphics · doi:10.1145/988616.988619 · Cited by 12,208
Handbook of research on teaching
Wittrock, M. C. (1986) · Bibliothèque et Archives nationales du Québec (Québec government) · Cited by 10,630
Social Learning Theory
Pierce, W. D., & Bandura, A. (1977) · The Canadian Journal of Sociology · doi:10.2307/3340496 · Cited by 9,742
Meta-analysis in social research
(1982) · Evaluation and Program Planning · doi:10.1016/0149-7189(82)90011-8 · Cited by 3,896
The role of expectations and attributions in the alleviation of learned helplessness.
Dweck, C. S. (1975) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0077149 · Cited by 1,315
Cognitive Conceptions of Learning
Shuell, T. J. (1986) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543056004411 · Cited by 1,177
Timing of feedback and verbal learning.
Kulik, J. A., & Kulik, C.-L. C. (1988) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543058001079 · Cited by 703
Self-citation
Feedback in written instruction: The place of response certitude
Kulhavy, R. W., & Stock, W. (1989) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/bf01320096 · Cited by 579
Feedback in Written Instruction
Kulhavy, R. W. (1977) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543047002211 · Cited by 571 · cited 7×
“Reviewing research on feedback effects in written instruction, Kulhavy (1977) generated four propositions.”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluential
Student Interaction and Learning in Small Groups
Webb, N. M. (1982) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543052003421 · Cited by 494

Show all 48 references

Research works printed but not linked: 26

Anane FJK, 1987, Dissertation Abstracts International, 48, 2831A
Arnett PP, 1985, Dissertation Abstracts International, 46, 2537A
Aumiller LE, 1963, Dissertation Abstracts International, 24, 5187
Brown RS, 1964, Dissertation Abstracts International, 24, 2356
Bumgarner KM, 1984, Dissertation Abstracts International, 45, 1102A
Carels EJ, 1975, Dissertation Abstracts International, 36, 2094A
Chanond K, 1988, Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology
Clark RE, 1987, Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association
Clodfelder DL, 1968, Dissertation Abstracts International, 29, 2217B
Csikszentmihalyi M, 1978, The hidden costs of reward, 205
Elliot BA, 1986, Dissertation Abstracts International, 47, 2971A
Gherfal IR, 1982, Dissertation Abstracts International, 43, 147A
Heald HM, 1970, Dissertation Abstracts International, 31, 1621A
Hirsch RS, 1952, The effects of knowledge of test results on learning meaningful material
Hoffman BS, 1974, Dissertation Abstracts International, 35, 6006A
Hough JB, 1963, Phi Delta Kappan, 44, 286
Hyman C, 1981, Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Northeastern Educational Research Association
Hymel GM, 1980, Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association
Miechenbaum D, 1985, Thinking and learning skills, Vol. 2: Research and open questions
Olson GH, 1971, Dissertation Abstracts International, 32, 6214A
Pressey SL, 1926, School and Society, 23, 373
Schimmel BJ, 1983, Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association
Shuell TJ, 1980, Aptitude, learning, and instruction. Vol. 2: Cognitive process analyses of learning and problem-solving, 277
Snow RE, 1972, Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association
Tobias S, 1984, Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association
Tsao PK, 1977, Dissertation Abstracts International, 39, 1426A

Sorted by citations

The Power of Feedback
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/003465430298487 · Cited by 12,905
Assessment and Classroom Learning
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998) · Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice · doi:10.1080/0969595980050102 · Cited by 8,152
Focus on Formative Feedback
Shute, V. J. (2008) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/0034654307313795 · Cited by 4,631
“2 Bangert-Drowns, Kulik, Kulik, and Morgan (1991) Bangert-Drowns et al. (1991) examined 40 research studies on feedback using metaanalysis techniques.”
BackgroundInfluential
Feedback and Self-Regulated Learning: A Theoretical Synthesis
Butler, D. L., & Winne, P. H. (1995) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543065003245 · Cited by 3,334
The critical role of retrieval practice in long-term retention
Roediger, H. L., & Butler, A. C. (2011) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2010.09.003 · Cited by 1,796
Interactive Multimodal Learning Environments
Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. E. (2007) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-007-9047-2 · Cited by 2,043
What is assessment for learning
Wiliam, D. (2011) · Studies in Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2011.03.001 · Cited by 1,282
The Power of Feedback Revisited: A Meta-Analysis of Educational Feedback Research
Wisniewski, B., Zierer, K., & Hattie, J. (2020) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.03087 · Cited by 1,199
“Previous meta-analyses have produced inconsistent results of feedback on cognitive variables (Kulik and Kulik, 1988; Bangert-Drowns et al., 1991; Azevedo and Bernard, 1995; Kluger and DeNisi, 1996; Lyster and Saito, 2010) and signiﬁcant heterogeneity remains within the sub-group deﬁned by this…”
The Effects of School-Based Writing-to-Learn Interventions on Academic Achievement: A Meta-Analysis
Bangert-Drowns, R. L., Hurley, M. M., & Wilkinson, B. (2004) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543074001029 · Cited by 802
Self-citation
State of the science in health professional education: effective feedback
Archer, J. C. (2010) · Medical Education · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03546.x · Cited by 783
Building Intelligent Interactive Tutors : student-centered strategies for revolutionizing e-learning
Woolf, B. P. (2009) · HAL · Cited by 716
Effects of Feedback in a Computer-Based Learning Environment on Students’ Learning Outcomes: A Meta-Analysis
Van der Kleij, F. M., Feskens, R. C. W., & Eggen, T. J. H. M. (2015) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/0034654314564881 · Cited by 714
Improving the effectiveness of peer feedback for learning
Gielen, S., Peeters, E., Dochy, F., Onghena, P., & Struyven, K. (2010) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.007 · Cited by 615
Test-enhanced learning in medical education
Larsen, D. P., Butler, A. C., & Roediger III, H. L. (2008) · Medical Education · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.2008.03124.x · Cited by 610
The nature of feedback: How different types of peer feedback affect writing performance
Nelson, M. M., & Schunn, C. D. (2009) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/s11251-008-9053-x · Cited by 602
Promoting Learning and Achievement Through Self-Assessment
Andrade, H., & Valtcheva, A. (2009) · Theory Into Practice · doi:10.1080/00405840802577544 · Cited by 558
Collaborative dialogue patterns in naturalistic one‐to‐one tutoring
Graesser, A. C., Person, N. K., & Magliano, J. P. (1995) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.2350090604 · Cited by 546
Learning from Errors
Metcalfe, J. (2016) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-010416-044022 · Cited by 615
Feedback research revisited.
Mory, E. H. (2013) · doi:10.4324/9781410609519-40 · Cited by 496
Repeated testing produces superior transfer of learning relative to repeated studying.
Butler, A. C. (2010) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition · doi:10.1037/a0019902 · Cited by 492
‘In praise of educational research’: formative assessment
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2003) · British Educational Research Journal · doi:10.1080/0141192032000133721 · Cited by 466
FOCUS ON FORMATIVE FEEDBACK
Shute, V. J. (2007) · ETS Research Report Series · doi:10.1002/j.2333-8504.2007.tb02053.x · Cited by 482
Feedback enhances the positive effects and reduces the negative effects of multiple-choice testing
Butler, A. C., & Roediger, H. L. (2008) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/mc.36.3.604 · Cited by 457
Testing improves long-term retention in a simulated classroom setting
Butler, A. C., & Roediger, H. L. (2007) · European Journal of Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1080/09541440701326097 · Cited by 434
Assessment, feedback and the alchemy of learning
Watling, C., & Ginsburg, S. (2018) · Medical Education · doi:10.1111/medu.13645 · Cited by 461
A review of feedback models and typologies: Towards an integrative model of feedback elements
Panadero, E., & Lipnevich, A. A. (2022) · Educational Research Review · doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2021.100416 · Cited by 389
Feedback Strategies for Interactive Learning Tasks
Narciss, S. (2007) · doi:10.4324/9780203880869.ch11 · Cited by 389
The Role of Classroom Assessment in Teaching and Learning
Shepard, L. A. (2001) · Cited by 380
The Concept of Formative Assessment
Boston, C. (2020) · ScholarWorks@UMassAmherst (University of Massachusetts Amherst) · doi:10.7275/kmcq-dj31 · Cited by 355
Self and Peer Assessment in School and University: Reliability, Validity and Utility
Topping, K. J. (2006) · Kluwer Academic Publishers eBooks · doi:10.1007/0-306-48125-1_4 · Cited by 374
Examining the testing effect with open‐ and closed‐book tests
Agarwal, P. K., Karpicke, J. D., Kang, S. H. K., Roediger, H. L., III, & McDermott, K. B. (2007) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.1391 · Cited by 368
Formative Assessment and Writing: A Meta-Analysis
Graham, S., Hebert, M., & Harris, K. R. (2015) · The Elementary School Journal · doi:10.1086/681947 · Cited by 340
Correcting a metacognitive error: Feedback increases retention of low-confidence correct responses.
Butler, A. C., Karpicke, J. D., & Roediger, H. L., III (2008) · Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1037/0278-7393.34.4.918 · Cited by 361
The role of feedback and self-efficacy on web-based learning: The social cognitive perspective
Wang, S., & Wu, P.-Y. (2008) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2008.03.004 · Cited by 327
The effect of type and timing of feedback on learning from multiple-choice tests.
Butler, A. C., Karpicke, J. D., & Roediger, H. L. (2007) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied · doi:10.1037/1076-898x.13.4.273 · Cited by 321
The Nature of Learning
OECD (2010) · Educational research and innovation · doi:10.1787/9789264086487-en · Cited by 418
A Theory-Based Meta-Analysis of Research on Instruction.
Marzano, R. J. (1998) · Cited by 309
A Meta-Analysis of the Effects of Feedback in Computer-Based Instruction
Azevedo, R., & Bernard, R. M. (1995) · Journal of Educational Computing Research · doi:10.2190/9lmd-3u28-3a0g-ftqt · Cited by 308
Web‐based peer assessment: feedback for students with various thinking‐styles
Lin, S. S. J., Liu, E. Z. F., & Yuan, S. (2001) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1046/j.0266-4909.2001.00198.x · Cited by 305
A Meta-Analysis of Negative Feedback on Intrinsic Motivation
Fong, C. J., Patall, E. A., Vasquez, A. C., & Stautberg, S. (2019) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/s10648-018-9446-6 · Cited by 299
Effective Tutoring Techniques: A Comparison of Human Tutors and Intelligent Tutoring Systems
Merrill, D. C., Reiser, B. J., Ranney, M., & Trafton, J. G. (1992) · Journal of the Learning Sciences · doi:10.1207/s15327809jls0203_2 · Cited by 298
Automated essay evaluation software in English Language Arts classrooms: Effects on teacher feedback, student motivation, and writing quality
Wilson, J., & Czik, A. (2016) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2016.05.004 · Cited by 297
Peer Assessment between Students in Colleges and Universities
Topping, K. (1998) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.2307/1170598 · Cited by 2,173
Formative assessment: a key to deep learning?
Rushton, A. (2005) · Medical Teacher · doi:10.1080/01421590500129159 · Cited by 291
Locus of feedback control in computer-based tutoring: impact on learning rate, achievement and attitudes
Corbett, A. T., & Anderson, J. R. (2001) · Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/365024.365111 · Cited by 280
Cognitive load and learning effects of having students organize pictures and words in multimedia environments: The role of student interactivity and feedback
Moreno, R., & Valdez, A. (2005) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/bf02504796 · Cited by 287
A Framework for Evaluating the Quality of Multimedia Learning Resources
Leacock, T. L., & Nesbit, J. C. (2007) · Cited by 267
Online peer assessment: effects of cognitive and affective feedback
Lu, J., & Law, N. W. Y. (2011) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/s11251-011-9177-2 · Cited by 272
Training Advanced Writing Skills: The Case for Deliberate Practice
Kellogg, R. T., & Whiteford, A. P. (2009) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520903213600 · Cited by 262
How feedback boosts motivation and play in a brain-training game
Burgers, C., Eden, A., van Engelenburg, M. D., & Buningh, S. (2015) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.01.038 · Cited by 245
A Review of Feedback Models and Theories: Descriptions, Definitions, and Conclusions
Lipnevich, A. A., & Panadero, E. (2021) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2021.720195 · Cited by 368
Estimating the Difference Between Published and Unpublished Effect Sizes: A Meta-Review
Polanin, J. R., Tanner-Smith, E. E., & Hennessy, E. A. (2016) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/0034654315582067 · Cited by 234
Effects of feedback in a computer-based assessment for learning
der Kleij, F. M. V., Eggen, T. J. H. M., Timmers, C. F., & Veldkamp, B. P. (2011) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.07.020 · Cited by 245
Blended Learning: How Teachers Balance the Blend of Online and Classroom Components
Jeffrey, L. M., Milne, J., Suddaby, G., & Higgins, A. (2014) · Journal of Information Technology Education Research · doi:10.28945/1968 · Cited by 237
Reflection prompts and tutor feedback in a web-based learning environment: effects on students' self-regulated learning competence
van den Boom, G., Paas, F., van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & van Gog, T. (2004) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2003.10.001 · Cited by 236
Effects of elicited reflections combined with tutor or peer feedback on self-regulated learning and learning outcomes
van den Boom, G., Paas, F., & van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (2007) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.09.003 · Cited by 232
Informal formative assessment: The role of instructional dialogues in assessing students’ learning
Ruiz‐Primo, M. A. (2011) · Studies In Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2011.04.003 · Cited by 268
Intelligent Tutoring Systems
Corbett, A. T., Koedinger, K. R., & Anderson, J. R. (1997) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-044481862-1.50103-5 · Cited by 244
Melding the Power of Serious Games and Embedded Assessment to Monitor and Foster Learning: Flow and Grow
Shute, V. J., Ventura, M., Bauer, M. I., & Diego (2009) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203891650-31 · Cited by 227
The effects of feedback on achievement, interest and self-evaluation: the role of feedback’s perceived usefulness
Harks, B., Rakoczy, K., Hattie, J., Besser, M., & Klieme, E. (2013) · Educational Psychology · doi:10.1080/01443410.2013.785384 · Cited by 287
Assessment in Game-Based Learning
Ifenthaler, D., Ge, X., & Eseryel, D. (2012) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-3546-4 · Cited by 232
The Role of Verbal Cues in Skill Learning
Landin, D. K. (1994) · Quest · doi:10.1080/00336297.1994.10484128 · Cited by 218
The effects of a digital formative assessment tool on mathematics achievement and student motivation: Results of a randomized experiment
Faber, J. M., Luyten, H., & Visscher, A. J. (2016) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2016.12.001 · Cited by 266
Effects of differential feedback on students’ examination performance.
Lipnevich, A. A., & Smith, J. K. (2009) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied · doi:10.1037/a0017841 · Cited by 199
Fostering the Intelligent Novice: Learning From Errors With Metacognitive Tutoring
Mathan, S. A., & Koedinger, K. R. (2005) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1207/s15326985ep4004_7 · Cited by 197
Students as the Definitive Source of Formative Assessment: Academic Self-Assessment and the Self-Regulation of Learning
(2010) · OpenCommons - UConn (University of Connecticut) · doi:10.4324/9780203874851-12 · Cited by 190
The effects of cooperative learning and feedback on e-learning in statistics
Krause, U.-M., Stark, R., & Mandl, H. (2008) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2008.03.003 · Cited by 186
Classroom assessment as the co-regulation of learning
Andrade, H., & Brookhart, S. M. (2019) · Assessment in Education Principles Policy and Practice · doi:10.1080/0969594x.2019.1571992 · Cited by 274
Personalized feedback in digital learning environments: Classification framework and literature review
Maier, U., & Klotz, C. (2022) · Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100080 · Cited by 218
Beyond ‘doing time’: Investigating the concept of student engagement with feedback
Handley, K., Price, M., & Millar, J. (2011) · Oxford Review of Education · doi:10.1080/03054985.2011.604951 · Cited by 181
The Wisdom of Practice
Lepper, M. R., & Woolverton, M. (2002) · Improving Academic Achievement · doi:10.1016/b978-012064455-1/50010-5 · Cited by 180
Student involvement in assessment: a project designed to assess class participation fairly and reliably
Dancer, D. M., & Kamvounias, P. (2005) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602930500099235 · Cited by 179
A surprising effect of feedback on learning
Vollmeyer, R., & Rheinberg, F. (2005) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2005.08.001 · Cited by 176
Peer versus expert feedback: An investigation of the quality of peer feedback among secondary school students
Hovardas, T., Tsivitanidou, O. E., & Zacharia, Z. C. (2014) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2013.09.019 · Cited by 176
Explanation feedback is better than correct answer feedback for promoting transfer of learning.
Butler, A. C., Godbole, N. R., & Marsh, E. J. (2012) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0031026 · Cited by 192
Improving student peer feedback
Nilson, L. B. (2003) · College Teaching · doi:10.1080/87567550309596408 · Cited by 172
Student Perceptions of Assessment Feedback: A Critical Scoping Review and Call for Research
Van der Kleij, F. M., & Lipnevich, A. A. (2021) · Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability · doi:10.1007/s11092-020-09331-x · Cited by 189
“I really need feedback to learn:” students’ perspectives on the effectiveness of the differential feedback messages
Lipnevich, A. A., & Smith, J. K. (2009) · Educational Assessment Evaluation and Accountability · doi:10.1007/s11092-009-9082-2 · Cited by 186
Giving and Receiving Effective Feedback: A Review Article and How-To Guide
Jug, R. C., Jiang, X. “., & Bean, S. M. (2018) · Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine · doi:10.5858/arpa.2018-0058-ra · Cited by 168
Role of Rubric-Referenced Self-Assessment in Learning to Write
Andrade, H. G., & Boulay, B. A. (2003) · The Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.1080/00220670309596625 · Cited by 167
The nature of feedback: How peer feedback features affect students’ implementation rate and quality of revisions.
Patchan, M. M., Schunn, C. D., & Correnti, R. J. (2016) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/edu0000103 · Cited by 165
The Effects of Instructional Rubrics on Learning to Write
Andrade, H. G. (2001) · Current Issues in Education · Cited by 165
Do we click in the right way? A meta-analytic review of clicker-integrated instruction
Chien, Y., Chang, Y.-H., & Chang, C. (2015) · Educational Research Review · doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2015.10.003 · Cited by 185
The Formative Purpose: Assessment Must First Promote Learning
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2004) · Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education · doi:10.1111/j.1744-7984.2004.tb00047.x · Cited by 170
Giving feedback – An integral part of education
Schartel, S. A. (2012) · Best practice & research. Clinical anaesthesiology · doi:10.1016/j.bpa.2012.02.003 · Cited by 195
Analysing feedback processes in an online teaching and learning environment: an exploratory study
Espasa, A., & Meneses, J. (2009) · Higher Education · doi:10.1007/s10734-009-9247-4 · Cited by 188
Rubric‐referenced self‐assessment and middle school students’ writing
Andrade, H., Du, Y., & Mycek, K. (2010) · Assessment in Education Principles Policy and Practice · doi:10.1080/09695941003696172 · Cited by 161
Fostering achievement and motivation with bug-related tutoring feedback in a computer-based training for written subtraction
Narciss, S., & Huth, K. (2006) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2006.07.003 · Cited by 162
A comparative study of peer and teacher feedback and of various peer feedback forms in a secondary school writing curriculum
Gielen, S., Tops, L., Dochy, F., Onghena, P., & Smeets, S. (2010) · British Educational Research Journal · doi:10.1080/01411920902894070 · Cited by 160
Assessment Through the Student's Eyes
Stiggins, R. (2007) · Educational leadership · Cited by 160
Investigating what feedback practices contribute to students’ writing motivation and engagement in Chinese EFL context: A large scale study
Yu, S., Jiang, L. G., & Zhou, N. (2020) · Assessing Writing · doi:10.1016/j.asw.2020.100451 · Cited by 187
Classroom Assessment: Tensions and Intersections in Theory and Practice
Brookhart, S. M. (2004) · Teachers College Record The Voice of Scholarship in Education · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9620.2004.00346.x · Cited by 163
QuizBot
Ruan, S., Jiang, L., Xu, J., Tham, B. J.-K., Qiu, Z., Zhu, Y., Murnane, E. L., Brunskill, E., & Landay, J. A. (2019) · CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3290605.3300587 · Cited by 156
Variables that affect the process and outcome of feedback, relevant for medical training: a meta‐review
van de Ridder, J. M. M., McGaghie, W. C., Stokking, K. M., & ten Cate, O. T. J. (2015) · Medical Education · doi:10.1111/medu.12744 · Cited by 154
Learner modeling for adaptive scaffolding in a Computational Thinking-based science learning environment
Basu, S., Biswas, G., & Kinnebrew, J. S. (2017) · User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction · doi:10.1007/s11257-017-9187-0 · Cited by 169
Developing science activities through a networked peer assessment system
Tsai, C.-C., Lin, S. S. J., & Yuan, S.-M. (2002) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/s0360-1315(01)00069-0 · Cited by 154
Research Article Science Assessments for All: Integrating Science Simulations Into Balanced State Science Assessment Systems
Quellmalz, E., Timms, M., Silberglitt, M., & Buckley, B. C. (2012) · Journal of Research in Science Teaching · doi:10.1002/tea.21005 · Cited by 132
Formative and Stealth Assessment
Shute, V. J., & Kim, Y. J. (2013) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-3185-5_25 · Cited by 149
Effects of a computer-assisted formative assessment intervention based on multiple-tier diagnostic items and different feedback types
Maier, U., Wolf, N., & Randler, C. (2016) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2015.12.002 · Cited by 148
How can video feedback be used in physical education to support novice learning in gymnastics? Effects on motor learning, self-assessment and motivation
Potdevin, F., Vors, O., Huchez, A., Lamour, M., Davids, K., & Schnitzler, C. (2018) · Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy · doi:10.1080/17408989.2018.1485138 · Cited by 178

Authors: Bangert-Drowns, R. L., Kulik, C.-L. C., Kulik, J. A., & Morgan, M.
Affiliations: State University of New York at Albany
University of Michigan (US)
State University of New York (US)
Venue: Review of Educational Research
Publisher: American Educational Research Association (AERA)
Published: 1991-06
Volume: 61
Issue: 2
Pages: 213-238
ISSN: 0034-6543 (ISSN-L)
1935-1046
DOI: 10.3102/00346543061002213
OpenAlex: W2171054741
Semantic Scholar: 116f5f0b52057e031f446e37ce7746ed5c1306e0
Cited by: 1,313
References: 48
Citations by year: 2026: 19 · 2025: 34 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 51 · 2022: 55 · 2021: 69 · 2020: 116 · 2019: 54 · 2018: 76 · 2017: 57 · 2016: 63 · 2015: 71 · 2014: 75 · 2013: 65 · 2012: 56
FWCI: 54.55
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: closed
Licence: journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
Locations: Review of Educational Research (publishedVersion)
Topics: Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
Keywords: feedback, error correction, pretest, retrieval practice, knowledge application, response certainty, presentation timing, written instructions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

The instructional effect of feedback in test-like events.

Abstract

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Claims other papers make about this one

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks