Cited by 1,313Student Assessment and FeedbackInnovative Teaching and Learning MethodsVisual and Cognitive Learning Processes

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 49 of the 49 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The instructional effect of feedback in test-like events.

Bangert-Drowns, Robert L., Kulik, Chen-Lin C., Kulik, James A., Morgan, MaryTeresa·1991·Review of Educational Research

DOI 10.3102/00346543061002213

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Feedback is an essential construct for many theories of learning and instruction, and an understanding of the conditions for effective feedback should facilitate both theoretical development and instructional practice. In an early review of feedback effects in written instruction, Kulhavy (1977) proposed that feedback’s chief instructional significance is to correct errors. This error-correcting action was thought to be a function of presentation timing, response certainty, and whether students could merely copy answers from feedback without having to generate their own. The present meta-analysis reviewed 58 effect sizes from 40 reports. Feedback effects were found to vary with control for presearch availability, type of feedback, use of pretests, and type of instruction and could be quite large under optimal conditions. Mediated intentional feedback for retrieval and application of specific knowledge appears to stimulate the correction of erroneous responses in situations where its mindful ( Salomon & Globerson, 1987 ) reception is encouraged.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3102/00346543061002213

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

From dissertation abstracts international
(1974) · ACM SIGGRAPH Computer Graphics · doi:10.1145/988616.988619 · Cited by 12,208
Handbook of research on teaching
Wittrock, M. C. (1986) · Bibliothèque et Archives nationales du Québec (Québec government) · Cited by 10,630
Social Learning Theory
Pierce, W. D., & Bandura, A. (1977) · The Canadian Journal of Sociology · doi:10.2307/3340496 · Cited by 9,742
Meta-analysis in social research
(1982) · Evaluation and Program Planning · doi:10.1016/0149-7189(82)90011-8 · Cited by 3,896
The role of expectations and attributions in the alleviation of learned helplessness.
Dweck, C. S. (1975) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0077149 · Cited by 1,315
Cognitive Conceptions of Learning
Shuell, T. J. (1986) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543056004411 · Cited by 1,177
Timing of feedback and verbal learning.
Kulik, J. A., & Kulik, C.-L. C. (1988) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543058001079 · Cited by 703
Self-citation
Feedback in written instruction: The place of response certitude
Kulhavy, R. W., & Stock, W. (1989) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/bf01320096 · Cited by 579
Feedback in Written Instruction
Kulhavy, R. W. (1977) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543047002211 · Cited by 571 · cited 7×
“Reviewing research on feedback effects in written instruction, Kulhavy (1977) generated four propositions.”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluential
Student Interaction and Learning in Small Groups
Webb, N. M. (1982) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543052003421 · Cited by 494

Show all 48 references

Research works printed but not linked: 26

Anane FJK, 1987, Dissertation Abstracts International, 48, 2831A
Arnett PP, 1985, Dissertation Abstracts International, 46, 2537A
Aumiller LE, 1963, Dissertation Abstracts International, 24, 5187
Brown RS, 1964, Dissertation Abstracts International, 24, 2356
Bumgarner KM, 1984, Dissertation Abstracts International, 45, 1102A
Carels EJ, 1975, Dissertation Abstracts International, 36, 2094A
Chanond K, 1988, Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology
Clark RE, 1987, Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association
Clodfelder DL, 1968, Dissertation Abstracts International, 29, 2217B
Csikszentmihalyi M, 1978, The hidden costs of reward, 205
Elliot BA, 1986, Dissertation Abstracts International, 47, 2971A
Gherfal IR, 1982, Dissertation Abstracts International, 43, 147A
Heald HM, 1970, Dissertation Abstracts International, 31, 1621A
Hirsch RS, 1952, The effects of knowledge of test results on learning meaningful material
Hoffman BS, 1974, Dissertation Abstracts International, 35, 6006A
Hough JB, 1963, Phi Delta Kappan, 44, 286
Hyman C, 1981, Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Northeastern Educational Research Association
Hymel GM, 1980, Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association
Miechenbaum D, 1985, Thinking and learning skills, Vol. 2: Research and open questions
Olson GH, 1971, Dissertation Abstracts International, 32, 6214A
Pressey SL, 1926, School and Society, 23, 373
Schimmel BJ, 1983, Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association
Shuell TJ, 1980, Aptitude, learning, and instruction. Vol. 2: Cognitive process analyses of learning and problem-solving, 277
Snow RE, 1972, Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association
Tobias S, 1984, Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association
Tsao PK, 1977, Dissertation Abstracts International, 39, 1426A

Sorted by citations

Items 301–400 of 1,000

A longitudinal perspective on inductive reasoning tasks. Illuminating the probability of change
Ifenthaler, D., & Seel, N. M. (2010) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2010.08.004 · Cited by 44
Dynamic assessment and its potential for the assessment of reading competence
Dörfler, T., Golke, S., & Artelt, C. (2009) · Studies In Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2009.10.005 · Cited by 44
The Effects of Online Feedback Training on Students’ Text Revision
Yang, Y.-F., & Meng, W.-T. (2013) · Language Learning & Technology · doi:10.64152/10125/44331 · Cited by 44
Implementation of formative assessment–effects of quality of programme delivery on students’ mathematics achievement and interest
Pinger, P., Rakoczy, K., Besser, M., & Klieme, E. (2018) · Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice · doi:10.1080/0969594x.2016.1170665 · Cited by 44
Communicating with Interactive Articles
Hohman, F., Conlen, M., Heer, J., & Chau, D. H. (2020) · Distill · doi:10.23915/distill.00028 · Cited by 46
Peer Assessment Enhances Student Learning: The Results of a Matched Randomized Crossover Experiment in a College Statistics Class
Sun, D. L., Harris, N., Walther, G., & Baiocchi, M. (2015) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0143177 · Cited by 60
The effects of a digital formative assessment tool on spelling achievement: Results of a randomized experiment
Faber, J. M., & Visscher, A. J. (2018) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2018.03.008 · Cited by 43
The Cost Effectiveness of 22 Approaches for Raising Student Achievement
Yeh, S. S. (2010) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/978-1-61735-404-520251009 · Cited by 43
Investigating the Effects of Group Response Systems on Student Satisfaction, Learning and Engagement in Accounting EducationPreprint
Webb, A., & Carnaghan, C. (2007) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.959370 · Cited by 43
Reconceptualizing the impact of feedback in second language writing: A multidimensional perspective
Liu, C., & Yu, S. (2022) · Assessing Writing · doi:10.1016/j.asw.2022.100630 · Cited by 55
Effectiveness of online regulation scaffolds on peer feedback provision and uptake: A mixed methods study
Alemdağ, E., & Yıldırım, Z. (2022) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2022.104574 · Cited by 51
Handheld tools that ‘Informate’ assessment of student learning in Science: a requirements analysis
Roschelle, J., Penuel, W. R., Yarnall, L., Shechtman, N., & Tatar, D. G. (2005) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2005.00127.x · Cited by 42
Distinguishing complex ideas about climate change: knowledge integration vs. specific guidance
Vitale, J. M., McBride, E. A., & Linn, M. C. (2016) · International Journal of Science Education · doi:10.1080/09500693.2016.1198969 · Cited by 44
Effects of a rubric for mathematical reasoning on teaching and learning in primary school
Smit, R., Bachmann, P., Blum, V., Birri, T., & Hess, K. (2017) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/s11251-017-9416-2 · Cited by 50
Reflection in example- and problem-based learning: effects of reflection prompts, feedback and cooperative learning
Krause, U.-M., & Stark, R. (2010) · Evaluation & Research in Education · doi:10.1080/09500790.2010.519024 · Cited by 43
Dynamic Assessment of Writing: The Impact of Implicit/Explicit Mediations on L2 Learners' Internalization of Writing Skills and Strategies
Alavi, S. M., & Taghizadeh, M. (2014) · Educational Assessment · doi:10.1080/10627197.2014.869446 · Cited by 42
Use of feedback calibration to reduce the training time for wine panels
Findlay, C. J., Castura, J. C., Schlich, P., & Lesschaeve, I. (2005) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2005.07.005 · Cited by 41
Instructional scaffolds for learning from formative peer assessment: effects of core task, peer feedback, and dialogue
Deiglmayr, A. (2017) · European Journal of Psychology of Education · doi:10.1007/s10212-017-0355-8
Unterricht
Lipowsky, F. (2020) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-61403-7_4 · Cited by 63
Promoting Student Ownership of Learning Through High-Impact Formative Assessment Practices
Brookhart, S. M., Moss, C. M., & Long, B. A. (2009) · Journal of MultiDisciplinary Evaluation · doi:10.56645/jmde.v6i12.234 · Cited by 41
Conditions for Web-Based Learning with Real Events
Bastiaens, T. J., & Martens, R. L. (2000) · IGI Global eBooks · doi:10.4018/978-1-878289-59-9.ch001 · Cited by 41
Relationships Between Teacher Feedback and Student Motivation: A Comparison Between Male and Female Students
Guo, W., & Zhou, W. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.679575 · Cited by 40
Unlocking student engagement and achievement: The impact of leaderboard gamification in online formative assessment for engineering education
Çiğdem, H., Öztürk, M., Karabacak, Y., ATİK, N., Gürkan, S., & Aldemir, M. H. (2024) · Education and Information Technologies · doi:10.1007/s10639-024-12845-2 · Cited by 90
Effective Use of Peer Assessment in a Graduate Level Writing Assignment: A Case Study
Landry, A., Jacobs, S., & Newton, G. S. (2014) · International Journal of Higher Education · doi:10.5430/ijhe.v4n1p38 · Cited by 40
Web-based collaborative reading exercises for learners in remote locations: the effects of computer-mediated feedback and interaction via computer-mediated communication
Murphy, P. (2010) · ReCALL · doi:10.1017/s0958344010000030 · Cited by 40
Adaptive Feedback in Computer-Based Instruction: Effects of Response Certitude on Performance, Feedback-Study Time, and Efficiency
Mory, E. (1994) · Journal of Educational Computing Research · doi:10.2190/ym7u-g8un-8u5h-hd8n · Cited by 42
Toward consilience in the use of task-level feedback to promote learning
Butler, A. C., & Woodward, N. R. (2018) · The Psychology of learning and motivation/The psychology of learning and motivation · doi:10.1016/bs.plm.2018.09.001 · Cited by 43
Tell me that I can do it better. The effect of attributional feedback from a learning technology on achievement emotions and performance and the moderating role of individual adaptive reactions to errors
Schrader, C., & Grassinger, R. (2020) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104028 · Cited by 40
Towards automated content analysis of educational feedback: A multi-language study
Osakwe, I., Chen, G., Whitelock‐Wainwright, A., Gašević, D., Cavalcanti, A. P., & Mello, R. F. (2022) · Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2022.100059 · Cited by 40
Special Topic / The Case For and Against Homework
Marzano, R. J., & Pickering, D. J. (2007) · Cited by 40
Beyond sharing: Engaging students in cooperative and competitive active learning
Kao, G. Y., Lin, S. S. J., & Sun, C. (2008) · Cited by 40
Manipulatives in Mathematics Education
Bartolini, M., & Martignone, F. (2020) · Encyclopedia of Mathematics Education · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-15789-0_93 · Cited by 31
Providing external feedback and prompting the generation of internal feedback fosters achievement, strategies and motivation in concept learning
Narciss, S., Prescher, C., Khalifah, L., & Körndle, H. (2022) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2022.101658 · Cited by 40
The Effects of Facilitating Feedback on Online Learners’ Cognitive Engagement: Evidence from the Asynchronous Online Discussion
Guo, W., Chen, Y., Lei, J., & Wen, Y. (2014) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci4020193 · Cited by 41
The Cost-Effectiveness of Five Policies for Improving Student Achievement
Yeh, S. S. (2007) · American Journal of Evaluation · doi:10.1177/1098214007307928 · Cited by 39
Using Targeted Feedback to Address Common Student Misconceptions in Introductory Programming: A Data-Driven Approach
Qian, Y., & Lehman, J. D. (2019) · Sage Open · doi:10.1177/2158244019885136 · Cited by 42
Do feedback strategies improve students' learning gain?-Results of a randomized experiment using polling technology in physics classrooms
Molin, F., Haelermans, C., Cabus, S. J., & Groot, W. (2021) · Comput. Educ. · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104339 · Cited by 35
AN ASSESSMENT FOR LEARNING SYSTEM CALLED ACED: DESIGNING FOR LEARNING EFFECTIVENESS AND ACCESSIBILITY
Shute, V. J., Hansen, E. G., & Almond, R. G. (2007) · ETS Research Report Series · doi:10.1002/j.2333-8504.2007.tb02068.x · Cited by 39
Agent-based dynamic support for learning from collaborative brainstorming in scientific inquiry
Wang, H., Rosé, C. P., & Chang, C. (2011) · International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning · doi:10.1007/s11412-011-9124-x · Cited by 39
Faculty Forum
(2006) · Teaching of Psychology · doi:10.1207/s15328023top3301_9 · Cited by 40
Rethinking strategy instruction: direct reading strategy instruction versus computer‐based guided practice
Lenhard, W., Baier, H., Endlich, D., Schneider, W., & Hoffmann, J. (2011) · Journal of Research in Reading · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9817.2011.01505.x · Cited by 38
Trickle-Down Accountability
Marsh, J. A., Farrell, C. C., & Bertrand, M. (2014) · Educational Policy · doi:10.1177/0895904814531653 · Cited by 46
The benefits of computer-generated feedback for mathematics problem solving.
Fyfe, E. R., & Rittle-Johnson, B. (2016) · Journal of Experimental Child Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2016.03.009 · Cited by 36
“Now you know what you’re doing right and wrong!” Peer feedback quality in synchronous peer assessment in secondary education
Rotsaert, T., Panadero, E., Schellens, T., & Raes, A. (2018) · European Journal of Psychology of Education · doi:10.1007/s10212-017-0329-x · Cited by 38
Brain-Friendly Strategies for the Inclusion Classroom
Willis, J. (2007) · Cited by 38
Feedback: Part of a System
Wiliam, D. (2012) · Educational leadership · Cited by 38
Automated tutoring for a database skills training environment
Kenny, C., & Pahl, C. (2005) · ACM SIGCSE Bulletin · doi:10.1145/1047124.1047377 · Cited by 38
Mathematics practice without feedback: A desirable difficulty in a classroom setting
Fyfe, E. R., & Rittle-Johnson, B. (2017) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/s11251-016-9401-1 · Cited by 37
Self–regulatory learning theory as a lens on how undergraduate and postgraduate learners respond to feedback: A BEME scoping review: BEME Guide No. 66
Spooner, M., Duane, C., Uygur, J., Smyth, E., Marron, B., Murphy, P., & Pawlikowska, T. R. B. (2021) · Medical Teacher · doi:10.1080/0142159x.2021.1970732 · Cited by 44
Self-confidence and performance goal orientation interactively predict performance in a reasoning test with accuracy feedback
Beckmann, N., Beckmann, J. F., & Elliott, J. G. (2008) · Learning and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2008.09.008 · Cited by 37
Evaluation von Unterrichtsstandards
Pietsch, M. (2010) · Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft · doi:10.1007/s11618-010-0113-z · Cited by 37
Cultivating ICT students’ interpersonal soft skills in online learning environments using traditional active learning techniques.
Myers, T., Blackman, A., Andersen, T., Hay, R., Lee, I., & Gray, H. (2014) · Journal of Learning Design · doi:10.5204/jld.v7i3.194 · Cited by 36
Benefits of additional online practice opportunities in higher education
Schwerter, J., Dimpfl, T., Bleher, J., & Murayama, K. (2021) · The Internet and Higher Education · doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2021.100834 · Cited by 43
When is ignorance bliss? The effects of inaccurate self-assessments of knowledge on learning and attrition
Sitzmann, T., & Johnson, S. K. (2011) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2011.11.004 · Cited by 38
Optimizing Learning of Scientific Category Knowledge in the Classroom: The Case of Plant Identification
Kirchoff, B. K., Delaney, P. F., Horton, M., & Dellinger-Johnston, R. (2014) · CBE—Life Sciences Education · doi:10.1187/cbe.13-11-0224 · Cited by 40
Differences in Reaction to Immediate Feedback and Opportunity to Revise Answers for Multiple-Choice and Open-Ended Questions
Attali, Y., Laitusis, C. C., & Stone, E. (2015) · Educational and Psychological Measurement · doi:10.1177/0013164415612548 · Cited by 36
Leading Student Assessment
Webber, C. F., & Lupart, J. (2011) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-1727-5 · Cited by 36
A critical analysis of the use of formative assessment in schools
Marsh, C. J. (2007) · Educational Research for Policy and Practice · doi:10.1007/s10671-007-9024-z · Cited by 36
Effectiveness of frequent testing over achievement: A meta analysis study
Başol, G., & Johanson, G. A. (2009) · Journal of Human Sciences · Cited by 35
A Web Based Statics Course Used In An Inverted Classroom
Dollár, A., & Steif, P. S. (2020) · ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition · doi:10.18260/1-2--4822 · Cited by 35
Supporting metacognitive monitoring in mathematics learning for young people with autism spectrum disorder: A classroom-based study
Maras, K., Gamble, T., & Brosnan, M. (2017) · Autism · doi:10.1177/1362361317722028 · Cited by 40
The Role of Rubrics in Learning and Implementation of Authentic Assessment: A Literature Review
Nkhoma, C., Nkhoma, M. Z., Thomas, S., & Le, N. Q. (2020) · Informing Science and IT Education Conference · doi:10.28945/4606 · Cited by 39
Learning economics concepts through game-play: An experiment
Dobrescu, L. I., Greiner, B., & Motta, A. (2014) · International Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2014.08.005 · Cited by 35
Feedback-related brain activity predicts learning from feedback in multiple-choice testing
Ernst, B., & Steinhauser, M. (2012) · Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience · doi:10.3758/s13415-012-0087-9 · Cited by 41
Simulation Learning
Breckwoldt, J., Gruber, H. G., & Wittmann, A. (2014) · Springer international handbooks of education · doi:10.1007/978-94-017-8902-8_25 · Cited by 36
Assessment as a Context for Student Engagement
Nichols, S. L., & Dawson, H. S. (2012) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_22 · Cited by 37
Teacher Feedback in Formative Classroom Assessment
Brookhart, S. M. (2011) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-1727-5_11 · Cited by 33
A metacognitive retrieval practice intervention to improve undergraduates’ monitoring and control processes and use of performance feedback for classroom learning.
Cogliano, M., Bernacki, M. L., & Kardash, C. M. (2020) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/edu0000624 · Cited by 46
Effectiveness and quality of peer video feedback in health professions education: A systematic review
Zhang, H., Liao, A. W. X., Goh, S. H. L., Yoong, S. Q., Lim, A. X. M., & Wang, W. (2021) · Nurse Education Today · doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2021.105203 · Cited by 33
Short Article: Learning to Fail: Reoccurring Tip-of-the-Tongue States
Warriner, A. B., & Humphreys, K. R. (2008) · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1080/17470210701728867 · Cited by 32
Factors affecting learning of vector math from computer-based practice: Feedback complexity and prior knowledge
Heckler, A. F., & Mikula, B. D. (2016) · Physical Review Physics Education Research · doi:10.1103/physrevphyseducres.12.010134 · Cited by 32
¿Podemos fiarnos de la evaluación en los sistemas de educación a distancia y digitales?
Aretio, L. G. (2021) · RIED Revista Iberoamericana de Educación a Distancia · doi:10.5944/ried.24.2.30223 · Cited by 41
Formative assessment in accounting education and some initial evidence on its use for instructional sequencing
Curtis, S. M. (2011) · Journal of Accounting Education · doi:10.1016/j.jaccedu.2012.06.002 · Cited by 33
Influence of Pedagogical Expertise and Feedback on Assessing Student Comprehension From Nonverbal Behavior
Webb, J. M., Diana, E. M., Luft, P., Brooks, E. W., & Brennan, E. L. (1997) · The Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.1080/00220679709597526 · Cited by 40
Teacher Candidates' Exposure to Formative Assessment in Educational Psychology Textbooks: A Content Analysis
Wininger, S. R., & Norman, A. D. (2005) · Educational Assessment · doi:10.1207/s15326977ea1001_2 · Cited by 32
Post-questioning, concept mapping and feedback: a distance education field experiment
Bernard, R. M., & Naidu, S. (1992) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.1992.tb00309.x · Cited by 36
COMPUTER-ASSISTED ASSESSMENT OF PRACTICE AT READING: A LARGE SCALE SURVEY USING ACCELERATED READER DATA
Topping, K. J. (1999) · Reading & Writing Quarterly · doi:10.1080/105735699278198 · Cited by 32
Use of ICT for acquiring, practicing and assessing algebraic expertise
Bokhove, C. (2011) · Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University) · Cited by 32
Independent reading: The relationship of challenge, non‐fiction and gender to achievement
Topping, K. J., Samuels, J., & Paul, T. (2008) · British Educational Research Journal · doi:10.1080/01411920701609380 · Cited by 78
A developmental perspective on feedback: How corrective feedback influences children’s literacy, mathematics, and problem solving
Fyfe, E. R., Borriello, G. A., & Merrick, M. (2022) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520.2022.2108426 · Cited by 31
The effects of feedback on students' achievement goals: Interaction between reference of comparison and regulatory focus
Shin, J., Lee, Y., & Seo, E. (2016) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.11.008 · Cited by 35
Effects of feedback design and dispositional goal orientations on volunteer performance in citizen science projects
Zhou, X., Tang, J., Zhao, Y., & Wang, T. (2020) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2020.106266 · Cited by 35
Testing pays off twice: Potentials of practice tests and feedback regarding exam performance and judgment accuracy
Naujoks-Schober, N., Harder, B., & Händel, M. (2022) · Metacognition and Learning · doi:10.1007/s11409-022-09295-x · Cited by 38
The effects of the use of mobile devices on the E-learning process and perceived learning outcomes in university online education
Eom, S. B. (2022) · E-Learning and Digital Media · doi:10.1177/20427530221107775 · Cited by 42
Effects of the Classroom Assessment Environment on Mathematics and Science Achievement
Brookhart, S. M. (1997) · The Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.1080/00220671.1997.10544590 · Cited by 31
Technology-based interactive guidance to promote learning performance and self-regulation: a chatbot-assisted self-regulated learning approach
Lee, Y.-F., Hwang, G., & Chen, P. (2025) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/s11423-025-10478-x · Cited by 56
An Insight to Students’ Perceptions on Teacher Feedback in Second Language Writing Classes
Şeker, M., & Dinçer, A. (2014) · English Language Teaching · doi:10.5539/elt.v7n2p73 · Cited by 31
OntoPeFeGe: Ontology-Based Personalized Feedback Generator
Demaidi, M. N., Gaber, M. M., & Filer, N. P. (2018) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2018.2846398 · Cited by 29
Self-Regulated Learning and Externally Generated Feedback with Hypermedia
Moos, D. C. (2011) · Journal of Educational Computing Research · doi:10.2190/ec.44.3.b · Cited by 31
The Impact of Writing Assignments on Student Learning: Should Writing Assignments Be Structured or Unstructured?
Dynan, L., & Cate, T. (2009) · International Review of Economics Education · doi:10.1016/s1477-3880(15)30078-5 · Cited by 30
Learning in critter corral
Blair, K. P. (2013) · ACM International Conference on Interaction Design and Children (IDC) · doi:10.1145/2485760.2485814 · Cited by 30
The effect of portfolios on students' learning: student teachers' views
Çimer, S. O. (2011) · European Journal of Teacher Education · doi:10.1080/02619768.2011.552183 · Cited by 30
Do Online homework systems improve student performance?
Gaffney, M. A., Ryan, D., & Wurst, C. (2010) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/s1085-4622(2010)0000011005 · Cited by 30
The Influence of Feedback Content and Feedback Time on Multimedia Learning Achievement of College Students and Its Mechanism
Taxipulati, S., & Hai-dong, L. (2021) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.706821 · Cited by 34
Students’ learning outcomes and peer rating accuracy in compulsory and voluntary online peer assessment
Liu, J., Guo, X., Gao, R., Fram, P., Ling, Y., Zhang, H., & Jin, W. (2018) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2018.1542659 · Cited by 34
Review of Feedback in Digital Applications – Does the Feedback They Provide Support Learning?
Tärning, B. (2018) · Journal of Information Technology Education Research · doi:10.28945/4104 · Cited by 29
Combination of Formative and Summative Assessment Instruments in Elementary Algebra Classes: A Prescription for Success
Peterson, E., & Siadat, M. V. (2009) · Journal of applied research in the community college · Cited by 29
Understanding and addressing the achievement gap through individualized instruction and formative assessment
Yeh, S. S. (2010) · Assessment in Education Principles Policy and Practice · doi:10.1080/09695941003694466 · Cited by 33
Conquering the cube
Keshavabhotla, S., Williford, B., Kumar, S. P. A., Hilton, E. C., Taele, P., Li, W., Linsey, J., & Hammond, T. (2017) · doi:10.1145/3092907.3092911 · Cited by 28
Retrospective cognitive feedback for progress monitoring in serious games
Nadolski, R. J., & Hummel, H. G. K. (2016) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.12503 · Cited by 29

Authors: Bangert-Drowns, R. L., Kulik, C.-L. C., Kulik, J. A., & Morgan, M.
Affiliations: State University of New York at Albany
University of Michigan (US)
State University of New York (US)
Venue: Review of Educational Research
Publisher: American Educational Research Association (AERA)
Published: 1991-06
Volume: 61
Issue: 2
Pages: 213-238
ISSN: 0034-6543 (ISSN-L)
1935-1046
DOI: 10.3102/00346543061002213
OpenAlex: W2171054741
Semantic Scholar: 116f5f0b52057e031f446e37ce7746ed5c1306e0
Cited by: 1,313
References: 48
Citations by year: 2026: 19 · 2025: 34 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 51 · 2022: 55 · 2021: 69 · 2020: 116 · 2019: 54 · 2018: 76 · 2017: 57 · 2016: 63 · 2015: 71 · 2014: 75 · 2013: 65 · 2012: 56
FWCI: 54.55
Type: journal article
Language: en
Open access: closed
Licence: journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
Locations: Review of Educational Research (publishedVersion)
Topics: Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
Keywords: feedback, error correction, pretest, retrieval practice, knowledge application, response certainty, presentation timing, written instructions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

The instructional effect of feedback in test-like events.

Abstract

Overview

Integrity signals

Verification

Claims the paper makes

Claims other papers make about this one

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Related

Metadata

Record

About these checks