The DOI matches its Crossref record; 49 of the 49 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The instructional effect of feedback in test-like events.
Abstract
Feedback is an essential construct for many theories of learning and instruction, and an understanding of the conditions for effective feedback should facilitate both theoretical development and instructional practice. In an early review of feedback effects in written instruction, Kulhavy (1977) proposed that feedback’s chief instructional significance is to correct errors. This error-correcting action was thought to be a function of presentation timing, response certainty, and whether students could merely copy answers from feedback without having to generate their own. The present meta-analysis reviewed 58 effect sizes from 40 reports. Feedback effects were found to vary with control for presearch availability, type of feedback, use of pretests, and type of instruction and could be quite large under optimal conditions. Mediated intentional feedback for retrieval and application of specific knowledge appears to stimulate the correction of erroneous responses in situations where its mindful ( Salomon & Globerson, 1987 ) reception is encouraged.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Previous meta-analyses have produced inconsistent results of feedback on cognitive variables (Kulik and Kulik, 1988; Bangert-Drowns et al., 1991; Azevedo and Bernard, 1995; Kluger and DeNisi, 1996; Lyster and Saito, 2010) and significant heterogeneity remains within the sub-group defined by this moderator in our analysis.”
From The Power of Feedback Revisited: A Meta-Analysis of Educational Feedback Research (2020) · cites this paper as Bangert-Drowns et al., 1991
Citations
Cites
From dissertation abstracts international
(1974) · ACM SIGGRAPH Computer Graphics · doi:10.1145/988616.988619 · Cited by 12,208
Handbook of research on teaching
Wittrock, M. C. (1986) · Bibliothèque et Archives nationales du Québec (Québec government) · Cited by 10,630
Pierce, W. D., & Bandura, A. (1977) · The Canadian Journal of Sociology · doi:10.2307/3340496 · Cited by 9,742
Meta-analysis in social research
(1982) · Evaluation and Program Planning · doi:10.1016/0149-7189(82)90011-8 · Cited by 3,896
The role of expectations and attributions in the alleviation of learned helplessness.
Dweck, C. S. (1975) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0077149 · Cited by 1,315
Cognitive Conceptions of Learning
Shuell, T. J. (1986) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543056004411 · Cited by 1,177
Timing of feedback and verbal learning.
Kulik, J. A., & Kulik, C.-L. C. (1988) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543058001079 · Cited by 703
Self-citationFeedback in written instruction: The place of response certitude
Kulhavy, R. W., & Stock, W. (1989) · Educational Psychology Review · doi:10.1007/bf01320096 · Cited by 579
Feedback in Written Instruction
Kulhavy, R. W. (1977) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543047002211 · Cited by 571 · cited 7×
“Reviewing research on feedback effects in written instruction, Kulhavy (1977) generated four propositions.”
BackgroundMethodResultInfluentialStudent Interaction and Learning in Small Groups
Webb, N. M. (1982) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543052003421 · Cited by 494
Research works printed but not linked: 26
- Anane FJK, 1987, Dissertation Abstracts International, 48, 2831A
- Arnett PP, 1985, Dissertation Abstracts International, 46, 2537A
- Aumiller LE, 1963, Dissertation Abstracts International, 24, 5187
- Brown RS, 1964, Dissertation Abstracts International, 24, 2356
- Bumgarner KM, 1984, Dissertation Abstracts International, 45, 1102A
- Carels EJ, 1975, Dissertation Abstracts International, 36, 2094A
- Chanond K, 1988, Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology
- Clark RE, 1987, Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association
- Clodfelder DL, 1968, Dissertation Abstracts International, 29, 2217B
- Csikszentmihalyi M, 1978, The hidden costs of reward, 205
- Elliot BA, 1986, Dissertation Abstracts International, 47, 2971A
- Gherfal IR, 1982, Dissertation Abstracts International, 43, 147A
- Heald HM, 1970, Dissertation Abstracts International, 31, 1621A
- Hirsch RS, 1952, The effects of knowledge of test results on learning meaningful material
- Hoffman BS, 1974, Dissertation Abstracts International, 35, 6006A
- Hough JB, 1963, Phi Delta Kappan, 44, 286
- Hyman C, 1981, Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Northeastern Educational Research Association
- Hymel GM, 1980, Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association
- Miechenbaum D, 1985, Thinking and learning skills, Vol. 2: Research and open questions
- Olson GH, 1971, Dissertation Abstracts International, 32, 6214A
- Pressey SL, 1926, School and Society, 23, 373
- Schimmel BJ, 1983, Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association
- Shuell TJ, 1980, Aptitude, learning, and instruction. Vol. 2: Cognitive process analyses of learning and problem-solving, 277
- Snow RE, 1972, Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association
- Tobias S, 1984, Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association
- Tsao PK, 1977, Dissertation Abstracts International, 39, 1426A
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 201–300 of 1,000
Control of feedback in computer-assisted instruction
Pridemore, D., & Klein, J. D. (1991) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/bf02296569 · Cited by 75
Supporting learning from text: A meta-analysis on the timing and content of effective feedback
Swart, E. K., Nielen, T. M. J., & Sikkema - de Jong, M. T. (2019) · Educational Research Review · doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2019.100296 · Cited by 68
Wiliam, D. (2018) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781316832134.003 · Cited by 69
Impacts of professional development in classroom assessment on teacher and student outcomes
Randel, B., Apthorp, H. S., Beesley, A. D., Clark, T. F., & Wang, X. (2016) · The Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.1080/00220671.2014.992581 · Cited by 73
Hartman, H. J. (2001) · Neuropsychology and cognition · doi:10.1007/978-94-017-2243-8_8 · Cited by 69
Does practice make perfect? Independent reading quantity, quality and student achievement
Topping, K. J., Samuels, J., & Paul, T. D. (2007) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.02.002 · Cited by 69
Panadero, E. (2023) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1080/00461520.2023.2223642 · Cited by 76
Trees, A. R., Kerssen‐Griep, J., & Hess, J. A. (2009) · Communication Education · doi:10.1080/03634520802613419 · Cited by 69
Reading comprehension exercises online: The effects of feedback, proficiency and interaction
Murphy, P. (2007) · Language learning & technology · doi:10.64152/10125/44120 · Cited by 66
Lipowsky, F. (2014) · Springer-Lehrbuch · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-41291-2_4 · Cited by 75
Improving Learning Efficiency of Factual Knowledge in Medical Education
Yeh, D. D., & Park, Y. S. (2015) · Journal of surgical education · doi:10.1016/j.jsurg.2015.03.012 · Cited by 66
Kerssen‐Griep, J., & Witt, P. L. (2012) · Communication Studies · doi:10.1080/10510974.2011.632660 · Cited by 71
Self-Efficacy and Self-Regulated Learning
Gaskill, P. J., & Hoy, A. W. (2002) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-012064455-1/50012-9 · Cited by 64
Getting at Student Understanding - the Key to Teachers’ Use of Test Data
Supovitz, J. A. (2012) · Teachers College Record The Voice of Scholarship in Education · doi:10.1177/016146811211401105 · Cited by 64
Clariana, R. B., & Lee, D. (2001) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/bf02504913 · Cited by 64
Correia, A., Koehler, N. A., Thompson, A. D., & Phye, G. D. (2018) · Research in Science & Technological Education · doi:10.1080/02635143.2018.1487834 · Cited by 84
Koenka, A. C., & Anderman, E. M. (2019) · Middle School Journal · doi:10.1080/00940771.2019.1674768 · Cited by 77
The effects of incentives and instructions on children's allocation of study time
Lockl, K., & Schneider, W. (2004) · European Journal of Developmental Psychology · doi:10.1080/17405620444000085 · Cited by 64
Providing feedback on computer-based algebra homework in middle-school classrooms
Fyfe, E. R. (2016) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2016.05.082 · Cited by 71
From Teachers to Schools: Scaling up Professional Development for Formative Assessment
Leahy, S., & Wiliam, D. (2012) · SAGE Publications Ltd eBooks · doi:10.4135/9781446250808.n4 · Cited by 63
Culturally Responsive Assessment: Provisional Principles
Walker, M. E., Olivera‐Aguilar, M., Lehman, B., Laitusis, C., Guzman‐Orth, D., & Gholson, M. (2023) · ETS Research Report Series · doi:10.1002/ets2.12374 · Cited by 62
Crisp, V., & Ward, C. (2007) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2007.02.004 · Cited by 62
Hinze, S. R., & Rapp, D. N. (2014) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.3032 · Cited by 71
Using wise interventions to motivate deliberate practice.
Eskreis-Winkler, L., Shulman, E. P., Young, V., Tsukayama, E., Brunwasser, S. M., & Duckworth, A. L. (2016) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/pspp0000074 · Cited by 75
Learning more from feedback: Elaborating feedback with examples enhances concept learning
Finn, B., Thomas, R. C., & Rawson, K. A. (2017) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2017.08.007 · Cited by 79
Ten maxims of formative assessment
Eachempati, P., & Ramnarayan, K. (2019) · AJP Advances in Physiology Education · doi:10.1152/advan.00173.2018 · Cited by 62
Guo, W., Lau, K., & Wei, J. (2019) · Studies In Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2019.07.001 · Cited by 70
Förster, M., Weiser, C., & Maur, A. (2018) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2018.02.012 · Cited by 69
Teacher inquiry into formative assessment practices in remedial reading classrooms
Brookhart, S. M., Moss, C. M., & Long, B. A. (2010) · Assessment in Education Principles Policy and Practice · doi:10.1080/09695940903565545 · Cited by 61
Sandwich feedback: The empirical evidence of its effectiveness
Procházka, J., Ovcari, M., & Ďuriník, M. (2020) · Learning and Motivation · doi:10.1016/j.lmot.2020.101649 · Cited by 63
Janelli, M., & Lipnevich, A. A. (2021) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2020.104076 · Cited by 60
Hellrung, K., & Hartig, J. (2013) · Educational Research Review · doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2012.09.001 · Cited by 63
Cotner, S. H., Fall, B. A., Wick, S. M., Walker, J. D., & Baepler, P. (2008) · Journal of Science Education and Technology · doi:10.1007/s10956-008-9112-8 · Cited by 60
Lin, H., & Dwyer, F. M. (2009) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/s11423-009-9133-x · Cited by 63
Smith, C. D., & King, P. E. (2004) · Communication Education · doi:10.1080/0363452042000265152 · Cited by 60
The Value of Time Limits on Internet Quizzes
Brothen, T., & Wambach, C. A. (2004) · Teaching of Psychology · doi:10.1207/s15328023top3101_12 · Cited by 60
Promoting science learning in game-based learning with question prompts and feedback
Law, V., & Chen, C. (2016) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2016.10.005 · Cited by 62
Brosvic, G. M., Epstein, M. L., Cook, M. J., & Dihoff, R. E. (2005) · The Psychological Record · doi:10.1007/bf03395518 · Cited by 60
Jordan, S. (2011) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.10.007 · Cited by 59
The cost-effectiveness of raising teacher quality
Yeh, S. S. (2008) · Educational Research Review · doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2008.06.002 · Cited by 59
Wang, S., & Zhang, D. (2020) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2020.1718599 · Cited by 67
Teacher Formative Assessment: The Missing Link in Response to Intervention
Reddy, L. A., Dudek, C. M., & Shernoff, E. S. (2015) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-7568-3_34 · Cited by 57
The testing effect: The role of feedback and collaboration in a tertiary classroom setting
Vojdanoska, M., Cranney, J., & Newell, B. R. (2009) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.1630 · Cited by 58
:null (2010) · Pedocs (German Institute for International Educational Research) · doi:10.25656/01:3324 · Cited by 58
Bolzer, M., Strijbos, J. W., & Fischer, F. (2015) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1111/jcal.12091 · Cited by 57
Review of Adaptive Training System Techniques
Landsberg, C. R., Astwood, R. S., Buskirk, W. L. V., Townsend, L. N., Steinhauser, N. B., & Mercado, A. D. (2012) · Military Psychology · doi:10.1080/08995605.2012.672903 · Cited by 60
Fiorella, L., Vogel-Walcutt, J. J., & Schatz, S. L. (2011) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/s11423-011-9218-1 · Cited by 62
Timmers, C. F., Walraven, A., & Veldkamp, B. P. (2015) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2015.03.012 · Cited by 58
Learning stoichiometry: a comparison of text and multimedia formats
Evans, K. L., Yaron, D., & Leinhardt, G. (2008) · Chemistry Education Research and Practice · doi:10.1039/b812409b · Cited by 56
From plans to actions: A process model for why feedback features influence feedback implementation
Wu, Y., & Schunn, C. D. (2021) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/s11251-021-09546-5 · Cited by 65
Incorporating Quality Scores in Meta-Analysis
Ahn, S., & Becker, B. J. (2011) · Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics · doi:10.3102/1076998610393968 · Cited by 56
Audience response systems: technology to engage learners.
Collins, J. (2008) · Journal of the American College of Radiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacr.2008.04.008 · Cited by 53
Cannon‐Bowers, J. A., Bowers, C. A., & Procci, K. (2010) · Surgical Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/j.suc.2010.02.006 · Cited by 57
Schoppek, W., & Tulis, M. (2010) · The Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.1080/00220670903382962 · Cited by 61
Peverly, S. T., & Wood, R. (2001) · Contemporary Educational Psychology · doi:10.1006/ceps.1999.1025 · Cited by 55
Math Education With Large Language Models: Peril or Promise?
Kumar, H., Rothschild, D. M., Goldstein, D. G., & Hofman, J. M. (2025) · Lecture Notes in Computer Science · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-98459-4_5 · Cited by 54
A Theory of Effective Computer-Based Instruction for Adults
Lowe, J. S., & Holton, E. F. (2005) · Human Resource Development Review · doi:10.1177/1534484305276301 · Cited by 58
Conroy, M. A., Sutherland, K. S., Haydon, T. F., Stormont, M. A., & Harmon, J. (2008) · Psychology in the Schools · doi:10.1002/pits.20350 · Cited by 56
Mechanix: A Sketch-Based Tutoring System for Statics Courses
Valentine, S., Vides, F., Lucchese, G., Turner, D., Kim, H.-H., Li, W., Linsey, J., & Hammond, T. (2012) · Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1609/aaai.v26i2.18966 · Cited by 54
Effects of performance feedback valence on perceptions of invested mental effort
Raaijmakers, S. F., Baars, M., Schaap, L., PAAS, F. G. W. C., & van Gog, T. (2016) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.12.002 · Cited by 67
Insights From the Science of Learning Can Inform Evidence-Based Implementation of Peer Instruction
Schell, J. A., & Butler, A. C. (2018) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2018.00033 · Cited by 54
Math Education with Large Language Models: Peril or Promise?
Kumar, H., Rothschild, D. M., Goldstein, D. G., & Hofman, J. (2023) · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4641653 · Cited by 54
Analyzing Teachers' Feedback Practices in Response to Students' Work in Science Classrooms
Ruiz‐Primo, M. A., & Li, M. (2013) · Applied Measurement in Education · doi:10.1080/08957347.2013.793188 · Cited by 65
The Formative Purpose: Assessment Must First Promote Learning
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2004) · Teachers College Record The Voice of Scholarship in Education · doi:10.1177/016146810410601402 · Cited by 53
Bouwman, T., Aartsen, M., van Tilburg, T. G., & STEVENS, N. L. (2016) · Journal of Social and Personal Relationships · doi:10.1177/0265407516659158 · Cited by 54
Makransky, G., Mayer, R. E., Nøremølle, A., Córdoba, A. L., Wandall, J., & Bonde, M. (2019) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/s11423-019-09690-3 · Cited by 58
Test Anxiety and the Immediate Feedback Assessment Technique
DiBattista, D., & Gosse, L. (2006) · The Journal of Experimental Education · doi:10.3200/jexe.74.4.311-328 · Cited by 51
The impact of elaborated feedback on text comprehension within a computer-based assessment
Golke, S., Dörfler, T., & Artelt, C. (2015) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2015.05.009 · Cited by 51
The Future of Adaptive Learning: Does the Crowd Hold the Key?
Heffernan, N. T., Ostrow, K., Kim, K. N., Selent, D., Inwegen, E. G. V., Xiong, X., & Williams, J. J. (2016) · International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education · doi:10.1007/s40593-016-0094-z · Cited by 51
Dobrovolny, J. (2006) · Distance Education · doi:10.1080/01587910600789506 · Cited by 50
Four-dimensional consideration of feedback in serious games
Dunwell, I., & de Freitas, S. (2011) · Murdoch University Research Portal · Cited by 51
Educational Game and Intelligent Tutoring System
Long, Y., & Aleven, V. A. W. M. M. (2017) · ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction · doi:10.1145/3057889 · Cited by 55
Mikula, B. D., & Heckler, A. F. (2017) · Physical Review Physics Education Research · doi:10.1103/physrevphyseducres.13.010122 · Cited by 55
The Effects of Self-Talk and Augmented Feedback on Learning the Tennis Forehand
Cutton, D. M., & Landin, D. K. (2007) · Journal of Applied Sport Psychology · doi:10.1080/10413200701328664 · Cited by 49
The impact of critical feedback choice on students' revision, performance, learning, and memory
Cutumisu, M., & Schwartz, D. L. (2017) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2017.06.029 · Cited by 54
Fong, C. J., Williams, K. M., Williamson, Z. H., Lin, S., Kim, Y. W., & Schallert, D. L. (2017) · Motivation and Emotion · doi:10.1007/s11031-017-9658-y · Cited by 50
Helping Students Understand Assessment
Chappuis, J. (2005) · Educational leadership · Cited by 49
El Saadawi, G. M., Tseytlin, E., Legowski, E., Jukic, D., Castine, M., Fine, J., Gormley, R., & Crowley, R. S. (2008) · Advances in Health Sciences Education · doi:10.1007/s10459-007-9081-3 · Cited by 48
Chase, J. A., & Houmanfar, R. A. (2009) · Journal of Behavioral Education · doi:10.1007/s10864-009-9089-2 · Cited by 47
Learning for Life: An Ecological Approach to Pedagogical Research
Daniel, D. B., & Poole, D. A. (2009) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1745-6924.2009.01095.x · Cited by 49
Berndt, M., Strijbos, J.-W., & Fischer, F. (2017) · European Journal of Psychology of Education · doi:10.1007/s10212-017-0343-z · Cited by 54
Guo, W., & Wei, J. (2019) · The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher · doi:10.1007/s40299-019-00434-8 · Cited by 58
21st Century Community Learning Centers
(2004) · PsycEXTRA Dataset · doi:10.1037/e417672005-001 · Cited by 48
ACADEMIC STRESS: ITS CAUSES AND RESULTS AT A UGANDAN UNIVERSITY
Nakalema, G., & Ssenyonga, J. (2014) · African Journal of Teacher Education · doi:10.21083/ajote.v3i3.2762 · Cited by 57
Dimova, S. (2017) · English for Specific Purposes · doi:10.1016/j.esp.2016.12.004 · Cited by 49
Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. E. (2010) · Cognitive Load Theory · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511844744.010 · Cited by 46
Bridging the Gap between Expert-Novice Differences
Ifenthaler, D. (2010) · Journal of Research on Technology in Education · doi:10.1080/15391523.2010.10782564 · Cited by 50
Using verification feedback to correct errors made on a multiple-choice test
Marsh, E. J., Lozito, J. P., Umanath, S., Bjork, E. L., & Bjork, R. A. (2012) · Memory · doi:10.1080/09658211.2012.684882 · Cited by 46
Enders, N., Gaschler, R., & Kubik, V. (2020) · Psychology Learning & Teaching · doi:10.1177/1475725720971205 · Cited by 58
Tang, F., & Zhan, P. (2021) · AERA Open · doi:10.1177/23328584211060804 · Cited by 63
der Kleij, F. M. V., Timmers, C. F., & Eggen, T. J. H. M. (2011) · CADMO · doi:10.3280/cad2011-001004 · Cited by 46
RESPONSE TO ASSESSMENT FEEDBACK: THE EFFECTS OF GRADES, PRAISE, AND SOURCE OF INFORMATION
Lipnevich, A. A., & Smith, J. K. (2008) · ETS Research Report Series · doi:10.1002/j.2333-8504.2008.tb02116.x · Cited by 109
Smit, R., Dober, H., Hess, K., Bachmann, P., & Birri, T. (2022) · Research in Mathematics Education · doi:10.1080/14794802.2022.2062780 · Cited by 76
Understanding the Effectiveness of Online Peer Assessment: A Path Model
Lu, J.-Y., & Zhang, Z. (2012) · Journal of Educational Computing Research · doi:10.2190/ec.46.3.f · Cited by 45
Enrichment of Peer Assessment with Agent Negotiation
Lan, C.-H., Sabine Graf, A., Lai, K.-H. R., & Kinshuk, K. (2010) · IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies · doi:10.1109/tlt.2010.30 · Cited by 45
A Comparison of Organizational Structure and Pedagogical Approach: Online versus Face-to-face
McFarlane, D. (2011) · The Journal of Educators Online · doi:10.9743/jeo.2011.1.1 · Cited by 45
Twelve tips for making the best use of feedback
van der Leeuw, R. M., & Slootweg, I. A. (2013) · Medical Teacher · doi:10.3109/0142159x.2013.769676 · Cited by 47
Integrating Educational Systems for Successful Reform in Diverse Contexts
Datnow, A., Lasky, S., Stringfield, S., & Teddlie, C. B. (2006) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511499906 · Cited by 45
Feedback calibration: A training method for descriptive panels
Findlay, C. J., Castura, J. C., & Lesschaeve, I. (2006) · Food Quality and Preference · doi:10.1016/j.foodqual.2006.02.007 · Cited by 45
Lee, Y.-F., Lin, C.-J., Hwang, G., Fu, Q.-K., & Tseng, W.-H. (2021) · Interactive Learning Environments · doi:10.1080/10494820.2021.1916763 · Cited by 47
Metadata
- Authors
- Bangert-Drowns, R. L., Kulik, C.-L. C., Kulik, J. A., & Morgan, M.
- Affiliations
- State University of New York at Albany
- University of Michigan (US)
- State University of New York (US)
- Venue
- Review of Educational Research
- Published
- 1991-06
- Volume
- 61
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 213-238
- ISSN
- 0034-6543 (ISSN-L)
- 1935-1046
- OpenAlex
- W2171054741
- Semantic Scholar
- 116f5f0b52057e031f446e37ce7746ed5c1306e0
- Cited by
- 1,313
- References
- 48
- Citations by year
- 2026: 19 · 2025: 34 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 51 · 2022: 55 · 2021: 69 · 2020: 116 · 2019: 54 · 2018: 76 · 2017: 57 · 2016: 63 · 2015: 71 · 2014: 75 · 2013: 65 · 2012: 56
- FWCI
- 54.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Review of Educational Research (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
- Keywords
- feedback, error correction, pretest, retrieval practice, knowledge application, response certainty, presentation timing, written instructions
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review