Cited by 478Innovations in Medical EducationCompetency Development and EvaluationHealth and Medical Education

Competency-based medical education in postgraduate medical education

Iobst, William F., Sherbino, Jonathan, Cate, Olle Ten, Richardson, Denyse L., Dath, Deepak, Swing, Susan R., Harris, Peter, Mungroo, Rani +3 more·2010·Medical Teacher

Abstract

With the introduction of Tomorrow's Doctors in 1993, medical education began the transition from a time- and process-based system to a competency-based training framework. Implementing competency-based training in postgraduate medical education poses many challenges but ultimately requires a demonstration that the learner is truly competent to progress in training or to the next phase of a professional career. Making this transition requires change at virtually all levels of postgraduate training. Key components of this change include the development of valid and reliable assessment tools such as work-based assessment using direct observation, frequent formative feedback, and learner self-directed assessment; active involvement of the learner in the educational process; and intensive faculty development that addresses curricular design and the assessment of competency.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3109/0142159x.2010.500709

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Iobst, W. F., Sherbino, J., Cate, O. T., Richardson, D. L., Dath, D., Swing, S. R., Harris, P., Mungroo, R., Holmboe, E. S., Frank, J. R., & Collaborators, F. T. I. C.
Affiliations
  • American Board of Internal Medicine (US)
  • Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada (CA)
  • University Medical Center Utrecht (NL)
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (US)
  • UNSW Sydney (AU)
  • University of Ottawa (CA)
Corresponding author
Iobst, William F.
Venue
Medical Teacher
Published
2010-07-27
Volume
32
Issue
8
Pages
651-656
ISSN
  • 0142-159X (ISSN-L)
  • 1466-187X
OpenAlex
W2134541962
Cited by
478
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 29 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 35 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 41 · 2021: 48 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 41 · 2018: 42 · 2017: 31 · 2016: 38 · 2015: 32 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 14
FWCI
12.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Medical Teacher (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Competency Development and Evaluation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health and Medical Education
Keywords
competency-based medical education, graduate medical education, Tomorrow's Doctors, workplace-based assessment, direct observation, formative feedback, faculty development, curricular design, competency assessment
MeSH terms
Accreditation, Competency-Based Education, Education, Medical, Graduate, Feedback, Humans, Internship and Residency

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review