The DOI matches its Crossref record; 69 of the 69 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Using focus groups in medical education research: AMEE Guide No. 91
Open accessAbstract
Qualitative research methodology has become an established part of the medical education research field. A very popular data-collection technique used in qualitative research is the "focus group". Focus groups in this Guide are defined as "… group discussions organized to explore a specific set of issues … The group is focused in the sense that it involves some kind of collective activity … crucially, focus groups are distinguished from the broader category of group interview by the explicit use of the group interaction as research data" (Kitzinger 1994, p. 103). This Guide has been designed to provide people who are interested in using focus groups with the information and tools to organize, conduct, analyze and publish sound focus group research within a broader understanding of the background and theoretical grounding of the focus group method. The Guide is organized as follows: Firstly, to describe the evolution of the focus group in the social sciences research domain. Secondly, to describe the paradigmatic fit of focus groups within qualitative research approaches in the field of medical education. After defining, the nature of focus groups and when, and when not, to use them, the Guide takes on a more practical approach, taking the reader through the various steps that need to be taken in conducting effective focus group research. Finally, the Guide finishes with practical hints towards writing up a focus group study for publication.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Lincoln, Y. S., Guba, E. G., & Pilotta, J. J. (1985) · International Journal of Intercultural Relations · doi:10.1016/0147-1767(85)90062-8 · Cited by 45,787
The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (2017) · Aldine (Routledge reprint) · doi:10.4324/9780203793206 · Cited by 25,789
Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches
Lewis, S. (2015) · Health Promotion Practice · doi:10.1177/1524839915580941 · Cited by 22,105
The SAGE handbook of qualitative research
(2005) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.43-1330 · Cited by 10,183
Focus Groups as Qualitative Research
Morgan, D. (1997) · doi:10.4135/9781412984287 · Cited by 8,863
Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research
Billson, J. M. (1989) · Human Biology · Cited by 8,560
The Discovery of Grounded Theory
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (2017) · The Discovery of Grounded Theory · doi:10.4324/9780203793206-1 · Cited by 8,344
Qualitative research. Introducing focus groups.
Kitzinger, J. (1995) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.311.7000.299 · Cited by 6,939
Qualitative research: standards, challenges, and guidelines
Malterud, K. (2001) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(01)05627-6 · Cited by 5,014
(1999) · Practitioner Research in Counselling · doi:10.4135/9781849209588.n8 · Cited by 3,958
Cited by
Ramani, S., Post, S. E., Könings, K., Mann, K., Katz, J. T., & van der Vleuten, C. (2017) · Teaching and Learning in Medicine · doi:10.1080/10401334.2016.1244014 · Cited by 138
Vrijsen, B. E. L., Naaktgeboren, C. A., Vos, L. M., van Solinge, W. W., Kaasjager, H. A. H., & ten Berg, M. J. (2020) · Annals of Medicine and Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.amsu.2020.02.002 · Cited by 55
Experiential learning in practice: An ethnographic study among nursing students and preceptors
Rodríguez-García, M., Medina-Moya, J. L., González-Pascual, J. L., & Cardenete-Reyes, C. (2018) · Nurse Education in Practice · doi:10.1016/j.nepr.2017.11.001 · Cited by 27
Devine, L. A., Ginsburg, S., Stenfors, T., Cil, T. D., McDonald-Blumer, H., Walsh, C. M., & Stroud, L. (2019) · Academic Medicine · doi:10.1097/acm.0000000000002411 · Cited by 9
Gupta, N., Sunil, S., Ali, K., Fink, T., & Du, X. (2026) · PLOS One · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0346079 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Stalmeijer, R. E., McNaughton, N., & Van Mook, W. N. K. A.
- Venue
- Medical Teacher
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2014-07-29
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 923-939
- ISSN
- 0142-159X (ISSN-L)
- 1466-187X
- OpenAlex
- W2124276993
- Cited by
- 608
- References
- 69
- FWCI
- 63.78
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Using focus groups in medical education research: AMEE Guide No. 91. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3109/0142159x.2014.917165
- The paper
- Stalmeijer, R. E., McNaughton, N., & Van Mook, W. N. K. A. (2014). Using focus groups in medical education research: AMEE Guide No. 91. Medical Teacher. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159x.2014.917165
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.