Cited by 62Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsCancer survivorship and careReligion, Spirituality, and Psychology

Effect of mindfulness-based stress reduction on somatic symptoms, distress, mindfulness and spiritual wellbeing in women with breast cancer: results of a randomized controlled trial

Open access
Würtzen, Hanne, Dalton, Susanne Oksbjerg, Christensen, Jane, Andersen, Klaus Kaae, Elsass, Peter, Flyger, Henrik L., Pedersen, Anne E., Sumbundu, Antonia +2 more·2015·Acta Oncologica

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Women with breast cancer experience different symptoms related to surgical or adjuvant therapy. Previous findings and theoretical models of mind-body interactions suggest that psychological wellbeing, i.e. levels of distress, influence the subjective evaluation of symptoms, which influences or determines functioning. The eight-week mindfulness-based stress reduction (MBSR) program significantly reduced anxiety and depression in breast cancer patients in a randomized controlled trial (NCT00990977). In this study we tested the effect of MBSR on the burden of breast cancer related somatic symptoms, distress, mindfulness and spiritual wellbeing and evaluated possible effect modification by adjuvant therapy and baseline levels of, distress, mindfulness and spiritual wellbeing. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A population-based sample of 336 women Danish women operated for breast cancer stages I-III were randomized to MBSR or usual care and were followed up for somatic symptoms, distress, mindfulness skills and spiritual wellbeing post-intervention and after six and 12 months. Effect was tested by general linear regression models post-intervention, and after six and 12 months follow-up and by mixed effects models for repeated measures of continuous outcomes. Effect size (Cohen's d) was calculated to explore clinical significance of effects among intervention group. Finally, modification of effect of MBSR on burden of somatic symptoms after 12 months' follow-up by adjuvant therapy and baseline levels of, distress, mindfulness and spiritual wellbeing were estimated. RESULTS: General linear regression showed a significant effect of MBSR on the burden of somatic symptoms post-intervention and after 6 months' follow-up. After 12 months' follow-up, no significant effect of MBSR on the burden of somatic symptoms was found in mixed effect models. A statistically significant effect of MBSR on distress was found at all time-points and in the mixed effect models. Significant effects on mindfulness were seen after six and 12 months and no significant effect was observed for spiritual wellbeing. No significant modification of MBSR effect on somatic symptom burden was identified. CONCLUSION: This first report from a randomized clinical trial on the long-term effect of MBSR finds an effect on somatic symptom burden related to breast cancer after six but not 12 months follow-up providing support for MBSR in this patient group.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3109/0284186x.2014.997371

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Among individuals with cancer, mindfulness-based interventions have been shown to improve depression, anxiety, fatigue, sleep, and overall physical functioning in randomized trials.

    “Among individuals with cancer, mindfulness-based interventions have been shown to improve depression, anxiety, fatigue, sleep, and overall physical functioning in randomized trials [15, 23, 24]”

    From Mindfulness, Experiential Avoidance, and Recovery From Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation. (2019) · cites this paper as [24]

    The trial’s introductory passage reports lower anxiety and depression in its randomized breast-cancer sample, and its Results report reduced somatic symptom burden through six months. The cited paper does not report improvements in fatigue, sleep, or overall physical functioning as outcomes of this trial; its Discussion mentions improved physical wellbeing in a separate trial, which is not the same outcome. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • An accepting, flexible approach to one's experience reduces distress and improves functioning and well-being.

    “This accepting, flexible approach to one's experience has been found to reduce distress and improve functioning and well-being [21-24]”

    From Mindfulness, Experiential Avoidance, and Recovery From Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation. (2019) · cites this paper as [24]

    The Results (page unavailable) report that mindfulness-based stress reduction reduced distress in women with breast cancer and improved spiritual well-being at six months, though the well-being difference was not significant at 12 months. The study tested the MBSR program, not the accepting approach separately, and did not establish improved functioning. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. and depression in adult cancer patients: Achievements and challenges . CA Cancer J Clin 2008 ; 58 : 214 -30 .
  2. tions for women with breast cancer: A meta-analysis . Health Psychol Rev 2009 ; 4 : 22 -41 . reduction in post-treatment breast cancer patients: An exam- ination of symptoms and symptom clusters . J Behav Med 2012 ; 35 : 86 -94 .
  3. 90R versions validated by item response models in a Danish community sample . Acta Psychiatr Scand 2004 ; 110 : 225 -9 .

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Würtzen, H., Dalton, S. O., Christensen, J., Andersen, K. K., Elsass, P., Flyger, H. L., Pedersen, A. E., Sumbundu, A., Steding-Jensen, M., & Johansen, C.
Affiliations
  • Copenhagen University Hospital (DK)
  • Danish Cancer Society (DK)
  • University of Copenhagen (DK)
  • Herlev Hospital (DK)
  • Ringsted Sygehus (DK)
Corresponding author
Würtzen, Hanne
Venue
Acta Oncologica
Published
2015-03-09
Volume
54
Issue
5
Pages
712-719
ISSN
  • 0284-186X (ISSN-L)
  • 1651-226X
OpenAlex
W2163949450
Cited by
61
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2
FWCI
9.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Acta Oncologica (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Dansk Kræftforsknings Fond
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Social Sciences › Health › Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology
Keywords
mindfulness-based stress reduction, breast cancer, somatic symptoms, psychological distress, mindfulness, spiritual well-being, adjuvant therapy, mind-body problem, long-term effects, women with cancer
MeSH terms
Breast Neoplasms, Denmark, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Middle Aged, Surveys and Questionnaires, Stress, Psychological, Time Factors, Linear Models, Chemotherapy, Adjuvant, Radiotherapy, Adjuvant, Spirituality, Mindfulness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review