Cited by 15Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsSpinal Cord Injury ResearchCancer survivorship and care

‘Trying to bring attention to your body when you’re not sure where it is’: An interpretative phenomenological analysis of drivers and barriers to mindfulness for people with spinal cord injury

Open access
Hearn, Jasmine Heath, Finlay, Katherine Anne, Sheffield, David·2021·British Journal of Health Psychology

Abstract

Objectives: Work is beginning to explore the impact of mindfulness in managing the physical and psychological health of people with spinal cord injury (SCI). However, no previous work has sought to understand what drives people with such conditions to try mindfulness, and what barriers are experienced in accessing mindfulness. Design: An exploratory, qualitative, interview design, utilizing interpretative phenomenological analysis. Methods: Semi‐structured interviews were conducted with 11 people with SCI who had experience of mindfulness since sustaining their injury. Verbatim transcripts were analysed using IPA to understand the lived experience of mindfulness post‐SCI. Results: Analysis suggested that managing physical and mental health, and viewing mindfulness as proactive and protective were key drivers for exploring mindfulness. However, multiple barriers to accessing opportunities and developing capability impeded engagement. These included the focus on areas of the body that participants had reduced sensation in, physical environments that could not be navigated in a wheelchair, social stigma surrounding the use of mindfulness, and a sense of obligation and risk of failure implied by perceived requirements for engagement. Conclusions: The results demonstrate the need for specific interventions to accommodate the reduced sensory and physical function experienced by people with neurological conditions and to enhance sense of control and autonomy. In addition, recommendations include minimizing the stigma surrounding mindfulness, and the potentially demotivating impact of the perception of ‘failing’ to engage.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/bjhp.12462

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Sensation-focused language used in mindfulness-based stress reduction and mindfulness-based cognitive therapy and lack of condition-specific health self-management in manualised mindfulness-based stress reduction meant participants felt it was not adequately adapted to multiple sclerosis or spinal cord injury.

    “the sensation-focused language used in Mindfulness-based Stress Reduction (MBSR) and Mindfulness-based Cognitive Therapy (MBCT) [16] and lack of condition-specific health self-management in manualised MBSR meant that participants felt that MBSR was not adequately adapted to MS or SCI [8, 14].”

    From Grieving a disrupted biography: an interpretative phenomenological analysis exploring barriers to the use of mindfulness after neurological injury or impairment (2021) · cites this paper as [16]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Psychological barriers to mindfulness encompass significant challenges of approaching, during meditation and post-meditation enquiry, the reality of one's health condition and its impact on identity.

    “Psychologically, barriers encompass the significant challenges of approaching, during meditation and post-meditation enquiry, the reality of one’s health condition and its impact on identity [16].”

    From Grieving a disrupted biography: an interpretative phenomenological analysis exploring barriers to the use of mindfulness after neurological injury or impairment (2021) · cites this paper as [16]

    The Results section (‘Focus on inaccessible bodily sensations’; page unavailable) describes distress when meditation directs participants with spinal cord injury to focus on body parts they cannot sense. The Discussion says this can emphasize their limitations while they adjust to their bodies after injury. These passages support a psychological barrier during meditation, but do not describe post-meditation enquiry or explicitly frame the barrier as confronting the condition’s impact on identity. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Phase 1 considered patient-perceived barriers to use of mindfulness after spinal cord injury and Phase 2 addressed the impact of mindfulness on body awareness in expert meditators with neurological injury or impairment.

    “Phase 1 considered patient-perceived barriers to use of mindfulness after SCI [16] and Phase 2 addressed the impact of mindfulness on body awareness in expert meditators with neurological injury or impairment [25].”
  • Barriers may be inherent in willingness to engage with mindfulness due to insecurities surrounding perceived stigma associated with mindfulness and worries over efficacy.

    “Barriers may also be inherent in the willingness to engage with mindfulness at all as a practice due to insecurities surrounding perceived stigma associated with mindfulness and worries over efficacy [16].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 37 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hearn, J. H., Finlay, K. A., & Sheffield, D.
Affiliations
  • Manchester Metropolitan University (GB)
  • University of Buckingham (GB)
  • University of Derby (GB)
Corresponding author
Hearn, Jasmine Heath
Venue
British Journal of Health Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-08-04
Volume
26
Issue
1
Pages
161-178
ISSN
  • 1359-107X (ISSN-L)
  • 2044-8287
OpenAlex
W3047316856
Cited by
15
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4
FWCI
0.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • British Journal of Health Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • e-space (Manchester Metropolitan University) (submittedVersion)
  • University of Derby Online Research Archive. (University of Derby) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Spinal Cord Injury Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
Keywords
mindfulness, spinal cord injury, lived experience, sensory impairment, wheelchair accessibility, stigma, mental health, physical health
MeSH terms
Humans, Spinal Cord Injuries, Qualitative Research, Mindfulness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review