Cited by 202Parasitic infections in humans and animalsParasitic Diseases Research and TreatmentHelminth infection and control

Aspects of Toxocara Epidemiology: Human Toxocarosis

Overgaauw, Paul A. M., Nederland, Virbac·1997·Critical Reviews in Microbiology

Abstract

Toxocarosis is the clinical disease in man caused by infection of zoonotic roundworms of dogs and cats, Toxocara canis and T. cati. In this review the mode of transmission to the human by oral ingestion of Toxocara eggs from the environment is discussed. T. cati seems to play a more important role than generally suggested. Direct contact with animals is not considered a potential risk because embryonation of excreted Toxocara ova requires a minimum of 2 weeks. For the same reason there is no relationship expected between infection and exposure to dogs and cats in the household. Children more frequently have clinical symptoms because of the closer contact with contaminated soil in yards and sandpits, the lack of hygiene, and because of eating dirt. Toxocara larval migration in the body can cause various clinical syndromes. Visceral larva migrans, ocular larva migrans, and covert toxocarosis are described. Serodiagnostic techniques are reliable tools to detect antibodies or antigens. Systemic treatment with anthelmintics is described but can result in hypersensitivity reactions caused by dying larvae. For ocular lesions, laser photocoagulation and corticosteroid therapy are described. Preventive measures consist of preventing contamination of the environment with Toxocara eggs and for education of pet owners and non-pet owners to increase awareness about potential zoonotic hazards. Veterinary practitioners, general practitioners, and public health agencies should therefore provide sufficient information and advice.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3109/10408419709115137

Cites

90 of 90 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Direct contact with infected pets presents no relevant risk in the transmission of intestinal nematodes and there is no association between pet ownership and infection occurrence.

    “direct contact with infected pets presents no relevant risk in the transmission of intestinal nematodes and there is no association between pet ownership and infection occurrence [78,79]”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Overgaauw, P. A. M., & Nederland, V.
Venue
Critical Reviews in Microbiology
Published
1997-01
Volume
23
Issue
3
Pages
215-231
ISSN
  • 1040-841X (ISSN-L)
  • 1549-7828
OpenAlex
W2126813494
Cited by
202
References
90
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 10
FWCI
2.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Critical Reviews in Microbiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Parasitic infections in humans and animals
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Parasitic Diseases Research and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Helminth infection and control
Keywords
toxocariasis, Toxocara canis, Toxocara cati, embryonation, larval migration, visceral larva migrans, ocular larva migrans, serological diagnosis, anthelmintic treatment, laser photocoagulation, corticosteroid therapy, environmental contamination, children, pet owners
MeSH terms
Animals, Humans, Larva Migrans, Visceral, Toxocariasis, Toxocara canis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review