The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The work and social adjustment scale: Reliability, sensitivity and value
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the psychometric properties of the Work and Social Adjustment Scale (WSAS) as an outcome measure for the Improving Access to Psychological Therapy programme, assessing its value as an addition to the Patient Health (PHQ-9) and Generalised Anxiety Disorder questionnaires (GAD-7). Little research has investigated these properties to date. METHODS: Reliability and responsiveness to change were assessed using data from 4,835 patients. Principal components analysis was used to determine whether the WSAS measures a factor distinct from the PHQ-9 and GAD-7. RESULTS: The WSAS measures a distinct social functioning factor, has high internal reliability, and is sensitive to treatment effects. CONCLUSIONS: The WSAS, PHQ-9 and GAD-7 perform comparably on measures of reliability and sensitivity. The WSAS also measures a distinct social functioning component suggesting it has potential as an additional outcome measure.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The WSAS [84, 85] is a 5-item self-report questionnaire to assess disability in daily life (e.g., work, home management, social activities) on a 9-point Likert scale (0 = no disability, 8 = severe disability).”
Citations
Cites
The PHQ-9: Validity of a brief depression severity measure
Kroenke, K., Spitzer, R. L., & Williams, J. B. W. (2001) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009606.x · Cited by 44,910
A Brief Measure for Assessing Generalized Anxiety Disorder: The GAD-7
Spitzer, R. L., Kroenke, K., Williams, J. B. W., & Löwe, B. (2006) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinte.166.10.1092 · Cited by 31,765
The Work and Social Adjustment Scale: a simple measure of impairment in functioning
Mundt, J. C., Marks, I. M., Shear, M. K., & Greist, J. M. (2002) · British Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1192/bjp.180.5.461 · Cited by 2,515
Evaluating patient-based outcome measures for use in clinical trials.
Fitzpatrick, Davey, Buxton, & Jones (1998) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/hta2140 · Cited by 1,715
Löwe, B., Kroenke, K., Herzog, W., & Gräfe, K. (2004) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/s0165-0327(03)00198-8 · Cited by 1,558 · cited 3×
“However, using Löwe et al. (2004b) criteria with the current sample results in a minimal clinically significant change for the GAD-7 of 3-points.”
MethodThe English indices of deprivation 2004
Noble, M., Wright, G., Dibben, C., Smith, G., McLennan, D., Anttila, C., Barnes, H., Mokhtar, C., Noble, S., & Gardner, J. (2004) · Cited by 1,494
Monitoring Depression Treatment Outcomes With the Patient Health Questionnaire-9
L??we, B., Un??tzer, J., Callahan, C. M., Perkins, A. J., & Kroenke, K. (2004) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/00005650-200412000-00006 · Cited by 1,354
Fitzpatrick, R. M., Shortall, Sculpher, Murray, Morris, Lodge, Dawson, Carr, Britton, & Briggs, A. H. (1998) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/hta2200 · Cited by 969
Health and quality of life outcomes
Jolly, M., Sequeira, W., & Block, J. A. (2014) · Health and Quality of Life Outcomes · doi:10.1186/s12955-014-0173-5 · Cited by 722
The English Indices of Deprivation 2010
McLennan, D., Barnes, H., Noble, M., Davies, J., Garrett, E., & Dibben, C. J. L. (2011) · Cited by 591
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- Arbuckle JL, 2010, AMOS, v19.0.0 build 1376
- Fitzpatrick R, 1998, Health Technol Assess, 2, 1
- Department of Health, 2008, Improving access to psychological therapis implementaion plan: National guidlines for regional delivery
- Marks I, 1986, Behavioural psychotherapy Bristol: John Wright, now published by I
- SPSS, 2010, IBM SPSS Statistics, v19.0.0
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Karatzias, T., Shevlin, M. E., Fyvie, C., Hyland, P., Efthymiadou, E., Wilson, D., Roberts, N. P., Bisson, J. I., Brewin, C. R., & Cloître, M. (2016) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2016.09.032 · Cited by 365
“The WSAS has been found to provide reliable and valid scores and be a useful indicator of global dysfunction (Jansson-Fröjmark, 2014, Zahra et al, 2014).”
MethodRandomised feasibility study of physiotherapy for patients with functional motor symptoms
Nielsen, G., Buszewicz, M., Stevenson, F., Hunter, R., Holt, K., Dudziec, M., Ricciardi, L., Marsden, J., Joyce, E., & Edwards, M. (2017) · Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry · doi:10.1136/jnnp-2016-314408 · Cited by 246
Outcomes of a 5-day physiotherapy programme for functional (psychogenic) motor disorders
Nielsen, G., Ricciardi, L., Demartini, B., Hunter, R. M., Joyce, E. M., & Edwards, M. J. (2015) · Journal of Neurology · doi:10.1007/s00415-014-7631-1 · Cited by 135
“The following outcome measures were collected: the Short Form 36 (SF-36) [14], EQ-5D-5L [15], Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) [16], Work and Social Adjustment Scale (WSAS) [17], Berg Balance Scale (BBS) [18] and the 10 Metre Walk Test (10MWT) [19].”
MethodWalker, S., Goodfellow, H., Pookarnjanamorakot, P., Murray, E., Bindman, J., BLANDFORD, A. E., Bradbury, K. J., Cooper, B., Hamilton, F. L., Hurst, J. R., et al. (2023) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2022-069217 · Cited by 140
Self-citationHomesickness: A Systematic Review of the Scientific Literature
Stroebe, M., Schut, H. A. W., & Nauta, M. H. (2015) · Review of General Psychology · doi:10.1037/gpr0000037 · Cited by 106
“Items for a new place adjustment questionnaire can likewise be derived from those that include specific new place items, and/or from questionnaires in the broader adjustment field (e.g., Baker & Siryk, 1999; Zahra et al., 2014).”
Pedersen, G., Kvarstein, E. H., & Wilberg, T. (2017) · Personality and Mental Health · doi:10.1002/pmh.1382 · Cited by 90
Hardy, C., Griffiths, A., Norton, S., & Hunter, M. S. (2018) · Menopause · doi:10.1097/gme.0000000000001048 · Cited by 86
“used in primary care psychology services in the UK and has been found to reflect a distinct social functioning factor and to be sensitive to treatment effects.(50) There were significant group differences in wellbeing and somatic symptoms at 20, but not at 6,”
MethodReyes, A. D. L., Makol, B. A., Racz, S. J., Youngstrom, E. A., Lerner, M. D., & Keeley, L. M. (2018) · Journal of Child and Family Studies · doi:10.1007/s10826-018-1238-6 · Cited by 80
Finnes, A., Ghaderi, A., Dahl, J., Nager, A., & Enebrink, P. (2019) · Journal of Occupational Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/ocp0000097 · Cited by 67
“The WSAS has proven high internal reliability and sensitivity to treatment effects (Mundt, Marks, Shear, & Greist, 2002; Zahra et al., 2014).”
BackgroundMethodRimes, K. A., Ion, D., Wingrove, J., & Carter, B. (2019) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/ccp0000416 · Cited by 73
“Reliable improvement for impairment was indicated by improvement on the Work and Social Adjustment Scale exceeding the measurement error for this scale (Zahra et al., 2014).”
MethodDunn, B. D., Widnall, E., Reed, N., Owens, C., Campbell, J., & Kuyken, W. (2019) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.brat.2019.103418 · Cited by 70
Jassi, A., Lenhard, F., Krebs, G., Gumpert, M., Jolstedt, M., Andrén, P., Nord, M., Aspvall, K., Wahlund, T., Volz, C., et al. (2020) · Child Psychiatry & Human Development · doi:10.1007/s10578-020-00956-z · Cited by 66
Rush, A. J., South, C. C., Jain, S. B., Agha, R. S., Zhang, M., Shrestha, S., Khan, Z., Hassan, M., & Trivedi, M. H. (2021) · Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment · doi:10.2147/ndt.s305331 · Cited by 62
Knapstad, M., Lervik, L. V., Sæther, S. M. M., Aarø, L. E., & Smith, O. R. F. (2019) · Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics · doi:10.1159/000504453 · Cited by 65
Santarnecchi, E., Bossini, L., Vatti, G., Fagiolini, A. M., Porta, P. L., Lorenzo, G. D., Siracusano, A., Rossi, S., & Rossi, A. (2019) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00129 · Cited by 71
Fatigue in an adult attention deficit hyperactivity disorder population: A trans‐diagnostic approach
Rogers, D. C., Dittner, A. J., Rimes, K. A., & Chalder, T. (2017) · British Journal of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjc.12119 · Cited by 50
“A reduction of eight points or more is suggestive of a clinically significant improvement (Zahra et al., 2014).”
BackgroundWheeler, M., Cooper, N. R., Andrews, L., Hughes, J. H., Juanchich, M., Rakow, T., & Orbell, S. (2020) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0241763 · Cited by 51
“The Work and Social Adjustment scale [WSAS; 61] is a 5-item measure of impairment in general social functioning and has high internal reliability and sensitivity to treatment effects [62].”
BackgroundTse, T., Yusoff, S. Z., Churilov, L. P., Ma, H., Davis, S. M., Donnan, G. A., Carey, L. M., & and the START research team (2017) · Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation · doi:10.1080/10749357.2017.1318339 · Cited by 53
“age (years), mean (sD) 67 (13) 67 (13) Female, n (%) 62 (34) 55 (33) employment status, n (%) continued no employment 109 (59) 96 (58) Gave up employment 31 (17) 26 (16) continued employment 40 (22) 39 (23) started employment 5 (3) 5 (3) engaged in therapy, n (%) 86 (46) 29 (17) mrs (0–6), median (iQr) 1.”
Pereira, J.-A., Barkham, M., Kellett, S., & Saxon, D. (2017) · Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research · doi:10.1007/s10488-016-0747-0 · Cited by 49
Quality of life across domains among individuals with treatment-resistant depression
Lex, H., Ginsburg, Y., Sitzmann, A. F., Grayhack, C., Maixner, D. F., & Mickey, B. J. (2018) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2018.09.062 · Cited by 40
“The Work and Social Adjustment Scale (WSAS), which rates the ability to work, pursue leisure activities, and maintain relationships (Mundt, Marks, Shear, & Greist, 2002), has high internal reliability and is sensitive to treatment effects (Zahra et al., 2014).”
BackgroundBrattmyr, M., Lindberg, M. S., Solem, S., Hjemdal, O., & Havnen, A. (2022) · BMC Psychiatry · doi:10.1186/s12888-022-04101-z · Cited by 40
“The psychometric properties of WSAS have been demonstrated in various studies, in a Norwegian outpatient setting [22] and in England, where it is suggested to be a good complement to PHQ-9 and GAD-7 [32].”
MethodCooper, M., van Rijn, B., Chryssafidou, E., & Stiles, W. B. (2021) · Counselling Psychology Quarterly · doi:10.1080/09515070.2021.1877620 · Cited by 39
“The measure shows good internal consistency (α = .82–.93), test–retest reliability, and clinical predictive validity (Mundt et al., 2002; Thandi et al., 2017); (Zahra et al., 2014).”
BackgroundTurton, R., Cardi, V., Treasure, J. L., & Hirsch, C. R. (2017) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2017.11.089 · Cited by 34
Forshaw, D., Wall, E. C., Prescott, G. J., Dehbi, H., Green, A., Attree, E., Hismeh, L., Strain, W. D., Crooks, M. G., Watkins, C. L., et al. (2023) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0272472 · Cited by 34
“Work and Social Adjustment Scale (WSAS) [Question 4 from Productivity Cost Questionnaire (iPCQ) for absenteeism and Question 8 from iPCQ for presenteeism added] [26, 27]”
MethodJha, M. K., Minhajuddin, A., Greer, T. L., Carmody, T. J., Rush, A. J., & Trivedi, M. H. (2016) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0167901 · Cited by 35
Fassbinder, E., Assmann, N., Schaich, A., Heinecke, K., Wagner, T., Sipos, V., Jauch-Chara, K., Hüppe, M., Arntz, A., & Schweiger, U. (2018) · BMC Psychiatry · doi:10.1186/s12888-018-1905-6 · Cited by 33
Kristensen, S. R., Mainz, J., Baandrup, L., Bonde, M., Videbech, P., Holmskov, J., & Bech, P. (2018) · Nordic Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1080/08039488.2018.1492017 · Cited by 33
“Concept for national psychiatric PRO-based indicators At least two national sum indicators – one on mental wellbeing based on the five WHO-5 items, and one on impairment of social functioning based on the five WSAS items – are to be established Furthermore, two indicators on overall health are planned.”
MethodInfluentialArnfred, S. M., Aharoni, R., Hvenegaard, M., Poulsen, S., Bach, B., Arendt, M., Rosenberg, N. K., & Reinholt, N. (2017) · BMC Psychiatry · doi:10.1186/s12888-016-1175-0 · Cited by 31
“It is validated for use across the full spectrum of psychiatric disorders and is used in epidemiological research as well as clinically [68].”
BackgroundFeasibility Trial of Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Fatigue in Hemodialysis (BReF Intervention)
Picariello, F., Moss-Morris, R. E., Norton, S., Macdougall, I. C., Silva‐Gane, M. D., Farrington, K., Clayton, H., & Chilcot, J. (2020) · Journal of Pain and Symptom Management · doi:10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2020.10.005 · Cited by 29
A prospective study of fatigue trajectories among in‐centre haemodialysis patients
Picariello, F., Norton, S., Moss-Morris, R. E., Macdougall, I. C., & Chilcot, J. (2019) · British Journal of Health Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjhp.12395 · Cited by 30
Correll, C. U., Cortese, S., Solmi, M., Boldrini, T., Demyttenaere, K., Domschke, K., Fusar‐Poli, P., Gorwood, P. A. P. M., Harvey, P. D., Keefe, R. S. E., et al. (2025) · World Psychiatry · doi:10.1002/wps.21338 · Cited by 33
“It has been shown to have good reliability 79 .”
Smith, O. R. F., Aarø, L. E., & Knapstad, M. (2023) · Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics · doi:10.1159/000530650 · Cited by 26
Atik, E., Stricker, J., Schückes, M., & Pittig, A. (2022) · doi:10.2196/preprints.44742 · Cited by 23
Heißel, A., Bollmann, J., Kangas, M., Abdulla, K. B., Rapp, M. A., & Sanchez, A. (2021) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/s12913-021-06622-x · Cited by 23
“17), indicating significant functional impairment in the present sample [13], which is comparable to values found in other international studies with depressed patients [15, 48, 49].”
ResultAtik, E., Stricker, J., Schückes, M., & Pittig, A. (2023) · JMIR Mental Health · doi:10.2196/44742 · Cited by 27
“This study comprised a broad set of outcome measures, covering symptoms of depression and anxiety, perceived functioning, well-being, satisfaction with the treatment program, and competencies [71-75].”
BackgroundJha, M. K., Teer, R., Minhajuddin, A., Greer, T. L., Rush, A. J., & Trivedi, M. H. (2017) · Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment · doi:10.2147/ndt.s128407 · Cited by 23
“The WSAS also has good convergent and discriminant validity and is sensitive to patient differences in severity, as well as treatment-related change.(34,35) Quality of Life Inventory (QOLI): the 32 QOLI items assess 16 domains of life.”
BackgroundHarty, S., Enrique, Á., Akkol‐Solakoglu, S., Adegoke, A., Farrell, H., Connon, G., Ward, F., Kennedy, C., Chambers, D., & Richards, D. (2023) · International Journal of Mental Health Systems · doi:10.1186/s13033-023-00592-9 · Cited by 25
“The WSAS demonstrated high internal reliability, with a Cronbach’s alpha of 0.82, and a sensitivity to treatment effects comparable to widely used measures like the PHQ-9 and GAD-7 [39].”
MethodInfluentialMeasuring participation in patients with chronic back pain—the 5-Item Pain Disability Index
McKillop, A. B., Carroll, L., Dick, B. D., & Battié, M. C. (2017) · The Spine Journal · doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2017.07.172 · Cited by 21
Andersen, L. H., Fallesen, P., & Bruckner, T. A. (2021) · BMC Public Health · doi:10.1186/s12889-021-11020-3 · Cited by 22
Stewart, C. S., Baudinet, J., Munuve, A., Bell, A., Konstantellou, A., Eisler, I., & Simic, M. (2022) · Journal of Eating Disorders · doi:10.1186/s40337-022-00535-8 · Cited by 20
“The WSAS has been demonstrated to have good psychometric properties, to identify constructs related to functioning rather than general impairment [35], and has been used with adults with eating disorders [36].”
MethodPalacios, J. E., Adegoke, A., Wogan, R., Duffy, D. J., Earley, C., Eilert, N., Enrique, Á., Sollesse, S., Chapman, J. E., & Richards, D. (2022) · British Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjop.12614 · Cited by 22
Client predictors of therapy dropout in a primary care setting: a prospective cohort study
Hanevik, E., Røvik, F. M. G., Bøe, T., Knapstad, M., & Smith, O. R. F. (2023) · BMC Psychiatry · doi:10.1186/s12888-023-04878-7 · Cited by 19
“For GAD-7, the majority (50.6”
BackgroundInfluentialArnfred, B. T., Bang, P., Hjorthøj, C. R., Winding, C., Moeller, K. S., Hvenegaard, M., Agerskov, L., Gausbøl, U. K., Soe, D., Wiborg, P., et al. (2022) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2021-051147 · Cited by 21
Morriss, R. K., Patel, S., Boutry, C., Patel, P., Guo, B., Briley, P. M., Butler, D. A., Craven, M. P., Duncan, A., Griffiths, C., et al. (2023) · The Lancet Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/s2215-0366(23)00007-x · Cited by 17
Lorenzo‐Luaces, L., & Howard, J. (2023) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/45411 · Cited by 16
“Prior work supports the reliability and validity of the WSAS across various patient populations [42].”
Malins, S., Biswas, S., Patel, S., Levene, J., Moghaddam, N. G., & Morriss, R. K. (2020) · British Journal of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1111/bjc.12244 · Cited by 15
“…criteria for minimal clinically significant difference from 2 All beta values reported are non-standardized. non-users in quality of life (EQ-5D, 0.135), general health (VAS, 13.14), and generalized anxiety (GAD-7, 3.04) (Pickard, Neary, & Cella, 2007; Walters & Brazier, 2005; Zahra et al., 2014).”
BackgroundInfluentialSedgwick, O., Hardy, A., Greer, B., Newbery, K., & Cella, M. (2021) · Journal of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1002/jclp.23193 · Cited by 15
Zhao, J., Zheng, H., Wang, X., Wang, X., Shi, Y., Xie, C.-R., Tao, Q., Li, D., Sun, J., Tian, J., et al. (2024) · Frontiers of Medicine · doi:10.1007/s11684-024-1073-7 · Cited by 14
Lee, C. T., Harty, S., Adegoke, A., Palacios, J. E., Gillan, C. M., & Richards, D. (2023) · International Journal of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1007/s12529-023-10215-9 · Cited by 18
“The measure has also demonstrated good reliability and sensitivity [26].”
BackgroundAn Empirical Study of Personality Disorders Among Treatment-Seeking Problem Gamblers
Brown, M., Oldenhof, E., Allen, J. S., & Dowling, N. A. (2016) · Journal of Gambling Studies · doi:10.1007/s10899-016-9600-3 · Cited by 14
“The WSAS has good psychometric properties, with internal consistency ranging from satisfactory to excellent (0.79–0.89) and a test–retest correlation of 0.84 (Cella et al. 2011; Mundt et al. 2002; Zahra et al. 2014).”
InfluentialWang, J., Goodfellow, H., Walker, S., BLANDFORD, A. E., Pfeffer, P., Hurst, J. R., Sunkersing, D., Bradbury, K. J., Robson, C., Henley, W., et al. (2024) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2024-088538 · Cited by 15
Self-citationMalkomsen, A., Wilberg, T., Bull-Hansen, B., Dammen, T., Evensen, J. H., Hummelen, B., Løvgren, A., Osnes, K., Ulberg, R., & Røssberg, J. I. (2025) · BMC Psychiatry · doi:10.1186/s12888-025-06544-6 · Cited by 25
“WSAS has been shown to have high internal reliability, and is sensitive to treatment effects [49].”
Knapstad, M., Sæther, S. M. M., Hensing, G. K. E., & Smith, O. R. F. (2020) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/s12913-020-4932-1 · Cited by 14
Irish, M., Dalton, B., Potts, L. C., McCombie, C., Shearer, J., Au, K., Kern, N., Clark-Stone, S., Connan, F., Johnston, A. L., et al. (2022) · Trials · doi:10.1186/s13063-022-06386-7 · Cited by 13
Lorenzo‐Luaces, L., Howard, J., Jesús-Romero, R. D., Peipert, A., Buss, J., Lind, C. M., Botts, K., & Starvaggi, I. (2022) · Cognitive Therapy and Research · doi:10.1007/s10608-022-10338-5 · Cited by 13
“Prior work supports the reliability and validity of the WSAS across various patient populations (Zahra et al., 2014).”
MethodBullis, J. R., Eustis, E. H., Curreri, A. J., Cardona, N. D., Woods, B. K., Rosellini, A. J., Barlow, D. H., & Farchione, T. J. (2023) · Journal of Mood and Anxiety Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.xjmad.2023.100024 · Cited by 13
“The WSAS has demonstrated high reliability and sensitivity [44].”
Exploring the mental health of individuals who play fantasy football
Wilkins, L., Dowsett, R., Zaborski, Z., Scoles, L. H., & Allen, P. M. (2021) · Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies · doi:10.1002/hbe2.316 · Cited by 12
Tsapekos, D., Taylor, R., & Cella, M. (2017) · Neuropsychological Rehabilitation · doi:10.1080/09602011.2017.1301263 · Cited by 13
“Participants’ functioning was assessed with the Work and Social Adjustment Scale–Revised (WSAS-R; Zahra et al., 2014).”
MethodSelf-citationRoberts, K., Travers-Hill, E., Coker, S., Troup, J., Casey, S., Parkin, K., & Kim, Y. (2021) · The Cognitive Behaviour Therapist · doi:10.1017/s1754470x21000258 · Cited by 11
Smith, O. R. F., Sæther, S. M. M., Haug, E., & Knapstad, M. (2022) · BMC Psychiatry · doi:10.1186/s12888-022-04227-0 · Cited by 11
“A client was defined as reliably recovered when scoring below threshold on both measures at follow-up and showing reliable improvement on either PHQ-9 or GAD-7.”
MethodInfluentialMcLean, C. P., Malek, N., & Straud, C. L. (2024) · Journal of Traumatic Stress · doi:10.1002/jts.23020 · Cited by 13
Transcutaneous Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation Treatment for Erythematotelangiectatic Rosacea
Li, J., Wei, J., Zhang, M., Kong, M., Xie, L., Wan, M., Pan, Z., Tian, J., Ou, Z., Chen, S., et al. (2025) · JAMA Dermatology · doi:10.1001/jamadermatol.2025.3796 · Cited by 13
Wogan, R., Enrique, Á., Adegoke, A., Earley, C., Sollesse, S., Gale, S., Chellingsworth, M., & Richards, D. (2021) · Internet Interventions · doi:10.1016/j.invent.2021.100443 · Cited by 11
Long-term outcomes of Prompt Mental Health Care: A randomized controlled trial
Sæther, S. M. M., Knapstad, M., Grey, N., Rognerud, M. A., & Smith, O. R. F. (2020) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.brat.2020.103758 · Cited by 11
O’Brien, C. L., Apputhurai, P., Knowles, S. R., Jenkins, Z., Ski, C. F., Thompson, D. R., Moore, G., Ward, G. M., Loh, M., & Castle, D. J. (2022) · Psychology and Health · doi:10.1080/08870446.2022.2060507 · Cited by 10
“The WSAS has demonstrated reliability and validity (Zahra et al., 2014).”
BackgroundHambrook, D. G., Aries, D., Benjamin, L., & Rimes, K. A. (2022) · Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy · doi:10.1017/s1352465822000297 · Cited by 10
“1PHQ-9; 2GAD-7; 3WSAS.”
MethodInfluentialSilverstein, M. W., Lee, D. J., Seligowski, A. V., & Worley, C. B. (2018) · Traumatology An International Journal · doi:10.1037/trm0000164 · Cited by 9
“The WSAS has demonstrated strong reliability, validity, and responsiveness to treatment across a number of populations (Mataix-Cols et al., 2005; Mundt et al., 2002; Zahra et al., 2014).”
BackgroundHoward, J., Jesús-Romero, R. D., Peipert, A., Riley, T. N., Rutter, L. A., & Lorenzo‐Luaces, L. (2021) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0245099 · Cited by 10
“Prior work supports the reliability and validity of WSAS ratings across various patient populations [33, 34].”
Backgroundde Sá, V. R., Gulá, P. V. S. S., Prizon, T., Falcoski, R. M., Ruggiero, R. N., & Padovan‐Neto, F. E. (2023) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-023-27845-4 · Cited by 9
Lundqvist, J., Lindberg, M. S., Brattmyr, M., Havnen, A., Hjemdal, O., & Solem, S. (2024) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0311420 · Cited by 8
Loades, M. E., Vitoratou, S., Rimes, K. A., & Chalder, T. (2020) · Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy · doi:10.1017/s1352465820000193 · Cited by 8
“In adults, the WSAS, from which the SSAS was developed, a distinct social functioning factor has been found (i.e. a 2-factor solution) (Zahra et al., 2014), but this did not appear to be the case for adolescents with CFS in the current study.”
BackgroundSerpeloni, F., Narrog, J. A., de Assis, S. G., Avanci, J. Q., Carleial, S., & Koebach, A. (2021) · Trials · doi:10.1186/s13063-021-05082-2 · Cited by 8
Shih, S., Chan, A. S. M., Yeung, E. Y. Y., Tsang, A. M., Chiu, R. L. P., Chu, M. H.-W., & Poon, M. (2021) · East Asian Archives of Psychiatry · doi:10.12809/eaap20101 · Cited by 8
Bakker, M. H., Hugtenburg, J. G., Bet, P. M., Twisk, J. W. R., van der Horst, H. E., & Slottje, P. (2025) · British Journal of General Practice · doi:10.3399/bjgp.2024.0173 · Cited by 8
“…and 6 36 ], anxiety and depression [Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale {HADS}], 37–39 and functioning [Work and Social Adjustment Scale {WSAS} 40,41 and Glasgow Sleep Impact Index {GSII} parts 1, 2, and 3 42 ]); • treatment satisfaction; • treatment sufficiency (additional sleep treatments…”
North American open-label 16-week trial of the MindShift smartphone app for adult anxiety
Rappaport, L. M., Jerome, E., Van Ameringen, M., Whittal, M., & McLean, C. P. (2023) · Journal of Mood & Anxiety Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.xjmad.2023.100036 · Cited by 7
Hovmand, O. R., Reinholt, N., Christensen, A. B., Bach, B., Eskildsen, A., Arendt, M. C. B. B., Hvenegaard, M., Poulsen, S., & Arnfred, S. (2023) · Nordic Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1080/08039488.2023.2226123 · Cited by 7
“Similar results were observed in other British patients with emotional disorders (alpha = .82) [14], German patients with depression (alpha= .89) [18], and Norwegian outpatients with personality disorders (alpha = .79) [16].”
BackgroundMethodResultEilert, N., Wogan, R., Adegoke, A., Earley, C., Duffy, D. J., Enrique, Á., Palacios, J. E., Timulák, L., & Richards, D. (2022) · Journal of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1002/jclp.23403 · Cited by 7
“The Work and Social Adjustment Scale (WSAS) is a valid measure of impaired functioning with sensitivity to treatment change and good reliability (Mundt et al., 2002; Zahra et al., 2014).”
BackgroundD’Amelio, R., Betz, L. T., Jow, S. M., Retz, W., Philipsen, A., Klein, J. P., Faßbinder, E., Jacob, G. A., & Retz‐Junginger, P. (2026) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291726103390 · Cited by 7
“…more participants in the intervention group showed meaningful improvements in work and social functioning (based on an MCID of 8 points [Zahra et al., 2014]; 26.2% vs. 11.6%; χ 2 = 11.9, p < .001; OR = 2.7, 95% CI = [1.5, 4.9]), depression levels (based on an MCID of 5 points [Löwe et…”
InfluentialLorenzo‐Luaces, L., Dierckman, C., Lind, C. M., Peipert, A., Jesús-Romero, R. D., Buss, J., Ramírez, I., Starvaggi, I., Adams, S. M., Howard, J., et al. (2024) · Cognitive Therapy and Research · doi:10.1007/s10608-024-10489-7 · Cited by 7
“Prior work supports the reliability and validity of the WSAS across various patient populations (Zahra et al., 2014 ).”
Bridge, L., Langford, K., McMullen, K., Rai, L., Smith, P. A., & Rimes, K. A. (2023) · Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy · doi:10.1002/cpp.2911 · Cited by 8
Adikari, A., Nawaratne, R., Silva, D. D., Carey, D. L., Walsh, A., Baum, C. M., Davis, S. M., Donnan, G. A., Alahakoon, D., & Carey, L. M. (2024) · Applied Sciences · doi:10.3390/app14156800 · Cited by 6
Calderbank, A., Gray, C., Morgan-Boon, A., & Reuber, M. (2023) · Journal of Neuropsychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.neuropsych.21070184 · Cited by 5
Emotion Regulation and Mentalization in Patients With Depression and Anxiety
Christensen, A. B., Poulsen, S., Højberg, T. M., Jessen, S. B., Reinholt, N., Hvenegaard, M., Eskildsen, A., Arendt, M. C. B. B., & Arnfred, S. (2024) · Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy · doi:10.1002/cpp.2995 · Cited by 5
Vainre, M., Galante, J., Watson, P., Dalgleish, T., & Hitchcock, C. (2022) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050951 · Cited by 4
Patient-reported outcome measures in depression
Steig, D. H. Á., Reinholt, N., Christensen, A. B., Pedersen, M. H., & Arnfred, S. (2022) · Nordic Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1080/08039488.2022.2074136 · Cited by 6
“It is validated for use across the full spectrum of psychiatric disorders and is used in epidemiological research as well as clinically [18,19].”
BackgroundHolgersen, K. H., Brønstad, I., Jensen, M. P., Brattland, H., Reitan, S. K., Hassel, A. M., Arentz, M., Lara‐Cabrera, M. L., & Skjervold, A. E. (2020) · Trials · doi:10.1186/s13063-020-04297-z · Cited by 6
Endhoven, B., De Cort, K., Matthijssen, S. J. M. A., de Jongh, A., van Minnen, A., Duits, P., Schruers, K. R. J., van Dis, E. A. M., Krypotos, A. M., Gerritsen, L., et al. (2023) · BMC Psychiatry · doi:10.1186/s12888-022-04320-4 · Cited by 4
“ASI Anxiety Sensitivity Index ATPTM Attitudes Toward Psychotherapy Treatment Manuals BSQ Bodily Sensation Questionnaire CBT Cognitive behavioral therapy CEQ Dutch credibility and expectancy scale CS Credibility Scale CSQ-8 Client Satisfaction Questionnaire EBPAS Evidence-Based Practice Attitude Scale EMDR Eye movement…”
BackgroundMoe, A. M., Blain, S. D., Kalathil, A., Peltier, S., Colombi, C., Thakkar, K. N., Burton, C. Z., & Tso, I. F. (2025) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s003329172500039x · Cited by 4
“Work and Social Adjustment Scale (WSAS; Zahra et al., 2014).”
Crawford, M., Leeson, V. C., Evans, R., Goulden, N., Weaver, T. D., Trumm, A., Barrett, B. M., Khun-Thompson, F., Pandya, S. P., Saunders, K. E. A., et al. (2024) · BMJ Open · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2024-086593 · Cited by 4
Skelton, M., Mundy, J., ter Kuile, A., Adey, B. N., Armour, C., Buckman, J. E. J., Coleman, J. R. I., Davies, M. R., Hirsch, C. R., Hotopf, M. H., et al. (2025) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291725101037 · Cited by 3
“Phenotypic correlations were consistent in size and pattern with previous estimates (Kroenke et al., 2001; Spitzer et al., 2006; Zahra et al., 2014) and existing evidence that symptom severity and functional impairment are partially independent.”
InfluentialCrawford, M. J., Leeson, V. C., Evans, R., Goulden, N., Kuhn-Thompson, F., Pandya, S. P., Trumm, A., Weaver, T. D., Barrett, B. M., Saunders, K., et al. (2026) · The Lancet Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/s2215-0366(25)00372-4 · Cited by 3
Barker, J., Oakes-Rogers, S., Lince, K., Taylor, A., Keddie, R., Bruce, H., Selvarajah, S., Fish, D., Aspen, C., & Leddy, A. (2023) · Death Studies · doi:10.1080/07481187.2023.2192532 · Cited by 3
“The Work and Social Adjustment Scale (WASAS) is evidenced to measure difficulties in daily functioning with excellent psychometric properties (Zahra et al., 2014).”
BackgroundPerspective taking as a transdiagnostic risk factor for interpersonal dysfunction
Hudson, C. C., Bowers, E. M., Björgvinsson, Þ., & Beard, C. (2024) · Journal of Psychiatric Research · doi:10.1016/j.jpsychires.2024.05.007 · Cited by 3
Moore, R., Gillanders, D. T., & Stuart, S. (2022) · Psychiatry International · doi:10.3390/psychiatryint3040024 · Cited by 3
Steyn, S., & Slabbert, M. (2024) · JMIR Formative Research · doi:10.2196/54216 · Cited by 5
“The WSAS, on the other hand, has proven to be a reliable and valid measure of impaired functioning, offering enough sensitivity to be an effective outcome measure [36,37].”
Spencer, L. H., Hendry, A., Makanjuola, A., Anthony, B. F., Davies, J. R., Pisavadia, K., Hughes, D. A., Fitzsimmons, D., Wilkinson, C., Edwards, R. T., et al. (2023) · medRxiv · doi:10.1101/2023.01.24.23284947 · Cited by 3
“Functional impairment was assessed using the Work and Social Adjustment Scale (WSAS), a reliable and valid tool (Zahra et al., 2014).”
MethodArnfred, B., Bang, P., Hjorthøj, C., Winding, C., Møller, K., Hvenegaard, M., Gausbøl, U. K., Sø, D., Rosenberg, N., & Nordentoft, M. (2019) · doi:10.21203/rs.2.504/v1 · Cited by 2
“Self-report questionnaires (FNE, CSQ, WAI, WSAS, WHO-5) will be answered by following a link send to the patients email address, which the patients can access either on a personal device or on one of the clinics computers.”
MethodLuciano, M., Carmassi, C., Sampogna, G., Bertelloni, C. A., Daga, G. A., Albert, U., Castellini, G., Rocca, B. D., Fantasia, S., Menchetti, M., et al. (2024) · Journal of Psychiatric Research · doi:10.1016/j.jpsychires.2024.02.016 · Cited by 4
“It is currently considered one of the most reliable self-reported questionnaires to assess psychosocial functioning, compared to the Social Functioning Questionnaire, WHO-Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS) and Short-Form 12-Item Health Survey (Zahra et al., 2014).”
BackgroundMethodPape, L. M., van Straten, A., Struijs, S. Y., Spinhoven, P., & Antypa, N. (2024) · Internet Interventions · doi:10.1016/j.invent.2024.100763 · Cited by 2
“The WSAS shows high internal reliability and sensitivity to treatment effects (Zahra et al., 2014).”
BackgroundGoff, S., Carson, J., Ladwa, A., Colletta, M., Topciu, R. A., Shear, K. M., & Dunn, B. D. (2025) · The Cognitive Behaviour Therapist · doi:10.1017/s1754470x25000030 · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- Zahra, D., Qureshi, A., Henley, W., Taylor, R., Quinn, C., Pooler, J., Hardy, G., Newbold, A., & Byng, R.
- Affiliations
- University of Plymouth (GB)
- Edge Hill University (GB)
- University of Exeter (GB)
- University of Sheffield (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Zahra, Daniel
- ORCID
- Venue
- International Journal of Psychiatry in Clinical Practice
- Publisher
- Informa UK Limited
- Published
- 2014-03-16
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 131-138
- ISSN
- 1365-1501 (ISSN-L)
- 1471-1788
- OpenAlex
- W2152311889
- Cited by
- 141
- References
- 22
- Citations by year
- 2026: 14 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 3
- FWCI
- 7.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Psychiatry in Clinical Practice (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) (submittedVersion)
- Edge Hill University Research Information Repository (Edge Hill University) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute for Health and Care Research
- National Institutes of Health
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
- Keywords
- Work and Social Adjustment Scale, psychometric properties, reliability statistics, responsiveness to change, social functioning, PHQ-9, GAD-7, Improving Access to Psychological Therapies, outcome measures, depression, generalized anxiety disorder, factor structure
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychometrics, Social Adjustment, Work, Young Adult, Patient Outcome Assessment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review