The DOI matches its Crossref record; 42 of the 42 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Fighting COVID-19 misinformation on social media: Experimental evidence for a scalable accuracy nudge intervention
Open accessAbstract
Across two studies with over 1,600 U.S. adults recruited online, we present evidence that people share false claims about COVID-19 partly because they simply fail to think sufficiently about whether or not content is accurate when deciding what to share. In Study 1, participants were far worse at discerning between true and false content when deciding what they would share on social media relative to when they are asked directly about accuracy. Furthermore, cognitive reflection and science knowledge were associated with stronger discernment. In Study 2, we found that a simple accuracy reminder at the beginning of the study – i.e., judging the accuracy of a non-COVID-19-related headline – more than doubled the level of truth discernment in participants’ sharing intentions. Our results, which mirror those found previously for political fake news, suggest that nudging people to think about accuracy is a simple way to improve choices about what to share on social media.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The check wasn’t confident either way, so it gives no verdict — never disputed.
In the citing paper
“Moreover, there is mixed research regarding whether corrections may actually increase belief in the original misinformation 121,124-126 or in other misleading claims that fail to get corrected 127 .”
From Using social and behavioural science to support COVID-19 pandemic response (2020) · cites this paper as [127]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredIn the citing paper
“Recent work has observed that there is a disconnect between perceptions of accuracy and sharing intentions: Even when participants are quite good at distinguishing between true and false headlines (if they are asked to judge accuracy), this ability to discern truth from falsehood often does not translate to sharing24–26.”
From Accuracy prompts are a replicable and generalizable approach for reducing the spread of misinformation (2022) · cites this paper as [26]
In the citing paper
“Evidence for the role of inattention comes from experiments in which prompting participants to think about the concept of accuracy – for example, by asking them to evaluate the accuracy of a random headline at the beginning of the study – reduces the disconnect between accuracy judgments and sharing intentions, and thereby increases the quality of news shared24–26.”
From Accuracy prompts are a replicable and generalizable approach for reducing the spread of misinformation (2022) · cites this paper as [26]
In the citing paper
“given the dissociation between accuracy judgments and sharing intentions observed in past work24–26”
From Accuracy prompts are a replicable and generalizable approach for reducing the spread of misinformation (2022) · cites this paper as [26]
In the citing paper
“and that the accuracy prompts are effective because they draw attention back to accuracy24,26”
From Accuracy prompts are a replicable and generalizable approach for reducing the spread of misinformation (2022) · cites this paper as [26]
In the citing paper
“In the experiments analyzed here, the true headlines were typically fairly ambiguous - see, for example, pre-test data24 and accuracy-only conditions26 in recent accuracy prompt studies”
From Accuracy prompts are a replicable and generalizable approach for reducing the spread of misinformation (2022) · cites this paper as [26]
In the citing paper
“where only roughly 60% of true headlines were rated as accurate”
From Accuracy prompts are a replicable and generalizable approach for reducing the spread of misinformation (2022) · cites this paper as [26]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Two new Later Stone Age sites from the Final Pleistocene in the Falémé Valley, eastern Senegal
Ndiaye, M., Lespez, L., Tribolo, C., Rassé, M., Hadjas, I., Davidoux, S., Huysecom, É., & Douze, K. (2024) · Monash University Research Portal (Monash University) · doi:10.3929/ethz-b-000667478 · Cited by 24,060
The case for motivated reasoning.
Kunda, Z. (1990) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.108.3.480 · Cited by 9,022
Cognitive Reflection and Decision Making
Frederick, S. (2005) · Journal of Economic Perspectives · doi:10.1257/089533005775196732 · Cited by 5,256
Lazer, D. M. J., Baum, M. A., Benkler, Y., Berinsky, A. J., Greenhill, K. M., Menczer, F., Metzger, M. J., Nyhan, B., Pennycook, G., Rothschild, D., et al. (2018) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aao2998 · Cited by 4,160
Self-citationWhy do humans reason? Arguments for an argumentative theory
Mercier, H., & Sperber, D. (2011) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x10000968 · Cited by 2,254
Pennycook, G., & Rand, D. G. (2019) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.011 · Cited by 2,022
Self-citationShifting attention to accuracy can reduce misinformation online
Pennycook, G., Epstein, Z., Mosleh, M., Arechar, A. A., Eckles, D., & Rand, D. G. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03344-2 · Cited by 1,155
Self-citationThe Cognitive Reflection Test as a predictor of performance on heuristics-and-biases tasks
Toplak, M. E., West, R. F., & Stanovich, K. E. (2011) · Memory & Cognition · doi:10.3758/s13421-011-0104-1 · Cited by 1,047
Coppock, A., & McClellan, O. A. (2019) · Research & Politics · doi:10.1177/2053168018822174 · Cited by 987
Berinsky, A. J., Margolis, M. F., & Sances, M. W. (2014) · American Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1111/ajps.12081 · Cited by 951
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Using social and behavioural science to support COVID-19 pandemic response
Bavel, J. J. V., Baicker, K., Boggio, P. S., Capraro, V., Cichocka, A., Cikara, M., Crockett, M. J., Crum, A. J., Douglas, K. M., Druckman, J. N., et al. (2020) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-020-0884-z · Cited by 4,964
Self-citationFunctional Fear Predicts Public Health Compliance in the COVID-19 Pandemic
Harper, C. A., Satchell, L. P., Fido, D., & Latzman, R. D. (2021) · International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction · doi:10.1007/s11469-020-00281-5 · Cited by 1,564
Puri, N., Coomes, E. A., Haghbayan, H., & Gunaratne, K. (2020) · Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics · doi:10.1080/21645515.2020.1780846 · Cited by 1,229
Huckins, J. F., daSilva, A. W., Wang, W., Hedlund, E., Rogers, C., Nepal, S. K., Wu, J., Obuchi, M., Murphy, E. I., Meyer, M. L., et al. (2020) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/20185 · Cited by 759
OSMUNDSEN, M., BOR, A., VAHLSTRUP, P. B., BECHMANN, A., & PETERSEN, M. B. (2021) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055421000290 · Cited by 614
Toward effective government communication strategies in the era of COVID-19
Hyland, B., Gardner, J., Leask, J., & Ecker, U. K. H. (2021) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-020-00701-w · Cited by 536
Fagherazzi, G., Goetzinger, C., Rashid, M. A., Aguayo, G. A., & Huiart, L. (2020) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/19284 · Cited by 426
OECD (2020) · OECD policy responses to coronavirus (Covid-19) · doi:10.1787/bef7ad6e-en · Cited by 336
Lee, J. J., Kang, K., Wang, M. P., Zhao, S. Z., Wong, J. Y. H., O’Connor, S., Yang, S. C., & Shin, S. H. (2020) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/22205 · Cited by 327
Governance responses to disinformation
Matasick, C., Alfonsi, C., & Bellantoni, A. (2020) · OECD working papers on public governance · doi:10.1787/d6237c85-en · Cited by 309
Unger, S. D., & Meiran, W. (2020) · International Journal of Technology in Education and Science · doi:10.46328/ijtes.v4i4.107 · Cited by 314
COVID-19 open source data sets: a comprehensive survey
Shuja, J., Alanazi, E., Alasmary, W., & Alashaikh, A. S. (2020) · Applied Intelligence · doi:10.1007/s10489-020-01862-6 · Cited by 278
Pennycook, G., & Rand, D. G. (2022) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-022-30073-5 · Cited by 270
Self-citationAli, S. H., Foreman, J., Tozan, Y., Capasso, A., Jones, A. M., & DiClemente, R. J. (2020) · JMIR Public Health and Surveillance · doi:10.2196/21071 · Cited by 252
COVIDLies: Detecting COVID-19 Misinformation on Social Media
Hossain, T., Logan, R. L., Ugarte, D. A., Matsubara, Y., Young, S. D., & Singh, S. (2020) · Workshop on NLP for COVID-19 (NLP-COVID19) · doi:10.18653/v1/2020.nlpcovid19-2.11 · Cited by 212
COVID-19 Misinformation Trends in Australia: Prospective Longitudinal National Survey
Pickles, K. M., Cvejic, E., Nickel, B., Copp, T., Bonner, C., Leask, J., Ayre, J., Batcup, C., Cornell, S., Dakin, T., et al. (2020) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/23805 · Cited by 206
Sallam, M., Dababseh, D., Yaseen, A. I. B., Al-Haidar, A., Taim, D., Eid, H., Ababneh, N. A., Bakri, F. G., & Mahafzah, A. M. (2020) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0243264 · Cited by 181
Political polarization drives online conversations about COVID ‐19 in the United States
Jiang, J., Chen, E., Shen, Y., Lerman, K., & Ferrara, E. (2020) · Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies · doi:10.1002/hbe2.202 · Cited by 193
Fake News and Covid-19 in Italy: Results of a Quantitative Observational Study
Moscadelli, A., Albora, G., Biamonte, M. A., Giorgetti, D., Innocenzio, M., Paoli, S., Lorini, C., Bonanni, P., & Bonaccorsi, G. (2020) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph17165850 · Cited by 186
Fighting fake news in the COVID-19 era: policy insights from an equilibrium model
Hartley, K., & Vu, M. K. (2020) · Policy Sciences · doi:10.1007/s11077-020-09405-z · Cited by 175
Codagnone, C., Bogliacino, F., Gómez, C. E., Charris, R., Montealegre, F., Liva, G., Lupiáñez‐Villanueva, F., Folkvord, F., & Veltri, G. (2020) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0240876 · Cited by 148
Breaking Harmony Square: A game that “inoculates” against political misinformation
Roozenbeek, J., & van der Linden, S. (2020) · Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review · doi:10.37016/mr-2020-47 · Cited by 171
Nagler, R. H., Vogel, R. I., Gollust, S. E., Rothman, A. J., Fowler, E. F., & Yzer, M. C. (2020) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0240776 · Cited by 134
COVID-19-Related Social Media Fake News in India
Al-Zaman, M. S. (2021) · Journalism and Media · doi:10.3390/journalmedia2010007 · Cited by 139
Rising Above Misinformation or Fake News in Africa: Another Strategy to Control COVID-19 Spread
Ahinkorah, B. O., Ameyaw, E. K., Hagan, J. E., Seidu, A., & Schack, T. (2020) · Frontiers in Communication · doi:10.3389/fcomm.2020.00045 · Cited by 119
Jahanbakhsh, F., Zhang, A. X., Berinsky, A. J., Pennycook, G., Rand, D. G., & Karger, D. R. (2021) · Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction · doi:10.1145/3449092 · Cited by 112
Self-citationWong, F. H. C., Liu, T., Leung, D. K. Y., Zhang, A. Y., Au, W. S. H., Kwok, W. W., Shum, A. K. Y., Wong, G. H. Y., & Lum, T. Y. S. (2021) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/26570 · Cited by 117
A Note on Increases in Inattentive Online Survey-Takers Since 2020
Ternovski, J., Orr, L., Kalla, J., & Aronow, P. M. (2022) · Journal of Quantitative Description Digital Media · doi:10.51685/jqd.2022.002 · Cited by 103
Wei, L., Gong, J., Xu, J., Abidin, N. E. Z., & Apuke, O. D. (2022) · Telematics and Informatics · doi:10.1016/j.tele.2022.101910 · Cited by 131
Khattar, A., Jain, P. R., & Quadri, S. M. K. (2020) · International Conference on Intelligent Computing and Control Systems (ICICCS) · doi:10.1109/iciccs48265.2020.9120955 · Cited by 102
Misbehaving in the Corona crisis: The role of anxiety and unfounded beliefs
Erceg, N., Ružojčić, M., & Galić, Z. (2020) · Current Psychology · doi:10.1007/s12144-020-01040-4 · Cited by 100
Covid-19 conspiracy beliefs and containment-related behaviour: The role of political trust
Karić, T., & Međedović, J. (2020) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2021.110697 · Cited by 78
Digital literacy is associated with more discerning accuracy judgments but not sharing intentions
Sirlin, N., Epstein, Z., Arechar, A. A., & Rand, D. G. (2021) · Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review · doi:10.37016/mr-2020-83 · Cited by 124
Self-citationDigital Media’s Role in the COVID-19 Pandemic
Bao, H., Cao, B., Xiong, Y. Y., & Tang, W. (2020) · JMIR mhealth and uhealth · doi:10.2196/20156 · Cited by 100
Research note: Fighting misinformation or fighting for information?
Acerbi, A., Altay, S., & Mercier, H. (2022) · Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review · doi:10.37016/mr-2020-87 · Cited by 124
Intellectual Humility Predicts Scrutiny of COVID-19 Misinformation
Koetke, J., Schumann, K., & Porter, T. (2022) · Social Psychological and Personality Science · doi:10.1177/1948550620988242 · Cited by 87
Tackling misinformation: What researchers could do with social media data
Pasquetto, I. V., Swire‐Thompson, B., & Amazeen, M. A. (2020) · Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review · doi:10.37016/mr-2020-49 · Cited by 99
Mining Physicians’ Opinions on Social Media to Obtain Insights Into COVID-19: Mixed Methods Analysis
Wahbeh, A., Nasralah, T., Al-Ramahi, M. A., & El-Gayar, O. (2020) · JMIR Public Health and Surveillance · doi:10.2196/19276 · Cited by 89
Developing an accuracy-prompt toolkit to reduce COVID-19 misinformation online
Epstein, Z., Berinsky, A. J., Cole, R., Gully, A., Pennycook, G., & Rand, D. G. (2021) · Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review · doi:10.37016/mr-2020-71 · Cited by 93
Self-citationNudging Social Media toward Accuracy
Pennycook, G., & Rand, D. G. (2022) · The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science · doi:10.1177/00027162221092342 · Cited by 106
Self-citationThe impact of COVID-19 among Black women: evaluating perspectives and sources of information
Chandler, R. D., Guillaume, D., Parker, A. G., Mack, A., Hamilton, J. B., Dorsey, J., & Hernandez, N. (2020) · Ethnicity and Health · doi:10.1080/13557858.2020.1841120 · Cited by 84
Nudging Away False News: Evidence from a Social Norms Experiment
Andı, S., & Akesson, J. (2020) · Digital Journalism · doi:10.1080/21670811.2020.1847674 · Cited by 87
The role of race, religion, and partisanship in misperceptions about COVID-19
Druckman, J. N., Ognyanova, K., Baum, M., Lazer, D. M. J., Perlis, R. H., Volpe, J. D., Santillana, M., Chwe, H., Quintana, A., & Simonson, M. D. (2021) · Group Processes & Intergroup Relations · doi:10.1177/1368430220985912 · Cited by 86
On the Disposition to Think Analytically: Four Distinct Intuitive-Analytic Thinking Styles
Newton, C., Feeney, J. R., & Pennycook, G. (2023) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/01461672231154886 · Cited by 119
Self-citationUsing Social and Behavioural Science to Support COVID-19 Pandemic ResponsePreprint
Bavel, J. J. V., D, K. B. A., Boggio, P. S., Capraro, V., Cichocka, A. K., Cikara, M., Crockett, M. J., Crum, A. J., Douglas, K. M., Druckman, J. N., et al. (2022) · SSRN Electronic Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.4178356 · Cited by 87
Self-citationInfodemia y COVID-19. Evolución y viralización de informaciones falsas en España
Duarte, J. M. S., & Rosa, R. M. (2020) · REVISTA ESPAÑOLA DE COMUNICACIÓN EN SALUD · doi:10.20318/recs.2020.5417 · Cited by 89
Combatting Against Covid-19 & Misinformation: A Systematic Review
Ali, S. (2020) · Human Arenas · doi:10.1007/s42087-020-00139-1 · Cited by 73
Antecedents and consequences of COVID-19 conspiracy beliefs: a systematic reviewPreprint
van Mulukom, V., Pummerer, L., Alper, S., Bai, H., Čavojová, V., Farias, J. E. M., Kay, C. S., Lazarević, L. B., Lobato, E. J. C., Marinthe, G., et al. (2020) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/u8yah · Cited by 71
The cognitive science of fake news
Levy, N. L., & Ross, R. M. (2021) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780429326769-23 · Cited by 69
Eder, S. J., Steyrl, D., Stefańczyk, M., Pieniak, M., Molina, J. M., Pešout, O., Binter, J., Smela, P., Scharnowski, F., & Nicholson, A. A. (2021) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0247997 · Cited by 61
Hammad, M. A., & Alqarni, T. M. (2021) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0248811 · Cited by 64
Reliance on emotion promotes belief in fake news
Martel, C., Pennycook, G., & Rand, D. G. (2019) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/a2ydw · Cited by 49
Self-citationThe Erosion of Trust During a Global Pandemic and How Public Administrators Should Counter It
Deslatte, A. (2020) · The American Review of Public Administration · doi:10.1177/0275074020941676 · Cited by 55
Zaman, A., Zhang, B., Hoque, M. E., Silenzio, V., & Kautz, H. (2020) · JMIR Mental Health · doi:10.2196/24012 · Cited by 52
Epistemic vice predicts acceptance of Covid-19 misinformation
Meyer, M., Alfano, M., & de Bruin, B. (2021) · Episteme · doi:10.1017/epi.2021.18 · Cited by 49
Review of social science research on the impact of countermeasures against influence operations
Courchesne, L., Ilhardt, J. G., & Shapiro, J. N. (2021) · Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review · doi:10.37016/mr-2020-79 · Cited by 56
MEMETAKAN PESAN HOAKS BERITA COVID-19 DI INDONESIA LINTAS KATEGORI, SUMBER, DAN JENIS DISINFORMASI
Bafadhal, O. M., & Santoso, A. D. (2020) · Bricolage Jurnal Magister Ilmu Komunikasi · doi:10.30813/bricolage.v6i02.2148 · Cited by 46
Verificación en la infodemia de la Covid-19. El caso Newtral
Aguado-Guadalupe, G., & Bernaola, I. (2020) · Revista Latina de Comunicación Social · doi:10.4185/rlcs-2020-1478 · Cited by 50
Managing Infodemics in the 21st Century
Purnat, T. D., Nguyen, T., & Briand, S. C. (2023) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-27789-4 · Cited by 46
Benson, J. (2024) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197767283.001.0001 · Cited by 40
Post, L. A., Issa, T. Z., Boctor, M. J., Moss, C. B., Murphy, R. L., Ison, M. G., Achenbach, C. J., Resnick, D., Singh, L. N., White, J. I., et al. (2020) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/24286 · Cited by 38
Adherence to behavioral Covid-19 mitigation measures strongly predicts mortality
Margraf, J., Brailovskaia, J., & Schneider, S. (2021) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0249392 · Cited by 37
Ternovski, J., Kalla, J., & Aronow, P. M. (2021) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/dta97 · Cited by 37
van Stekelenburg, A., Schaap, G., Veling, H., & Buijzen, M. (2020) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/24069 · Cited by 33
Borah, P., Irom, B., & Hsu, Y. (2021) · Journal of Youth Studies · doi:10.1080/13676261.2021.1965108 · Cited by 49
A Model of Online Misinformation
Acemoğlu, D., Ozdaglar, A., & Siderius, J. (2021) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w28884 · Cited by 42
Fazio, L. K., Rand, D. G., Lewandowsky, S., Susmann, M. W., Berinsky, A. J., Guess, A. M., Kendeou, P., Lyons, B. A., Miller, J. M., Newman, E. J., et al. (2024) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/uyjha · Cited by 38
Self-citationUniversitas Mercu Buana, I., Geni, G. L., Briandana, R., Universitas Mercu Buana, I., Umarella, F. H., & Universitas Mercu Buana, I. (2021) · Jurnal Komunikasi Malaysian Journal of Communication · doi:10.17576/jkmjc-2021-3702-15 · Cited by 34
Swami, V., & Barron, D. S. (2021) · Journal of Pacific Rim Psychology · doi:10.1177/18344909211037385 · Cited by 40
Profiling Fake News Spreaders on Social Media through Psychological and Motivational Factors
Karami, M., Nazer, T. H., & Liu, H. (2021) · ACM Conference on Hypertext and Social Media (HT) · doi:10.1145/3465336.3475097 · Cited by 40
Divulgação Científica no combate às Fake News em tempos de Covid-19
Dantas, L. F. S., & Deccache-Maia, E. (2020) · Research Society and Development · doi:10.33448/rsd-v9i7.4776 · Cited by 32
Social Media as Vehicle for Conspiracy Beliefs on COVID-19
Goreis, A., & Kothgassner, O. D. (2020) · Digital Psychology · doi:10.24989/dp.v1i2.1866 · Cited by 37
Glasdam, S., & Stjernswärd, S. (2020) · Social Sciences & Humanities Open · doi:10.1016/j.ssaho.2020.100090 · Cited by 31
Rosenzweig, L. R., Bagó, B., Berinsky, A. J., & Rand, D. G. (2021) · Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review · doi:10.37016/mr-2020-75 · Cited by 30
Self-citationPolitical Deepfakes Are As Credible As Other Fake Media And (Sometimes) Real Media
Barari, S., Lucas, C., & Munger, K. (2021) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/cdfh3 · Cited by 51
Biddlestone, M., Roozenbeek, J., & van der Linden, S. (2022) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.4025 · Cited by 32
The Development and Validation of the Epistemic Vice Scale
Meyer, M., Alfano, M., & de Bruin, B. (2021) · Review of Philosophy and Psychology · doi:10.1007/s13164-021-00562-5 · Cited by 31
Intersection of the Web-Based Vaping Narrative With COVID-19: Topic Modeling Study
Janmohamed, K., Soale, A., Forastiere, L., Tang, W., Sha, Y., Demant, J., Airoldi, E. M., & Kumar, N. (2020) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/21743 · Cited by 28
A value-driven approach to addressing misinformation in social media
Komendantova, N., Ekenberg, L., Svahn, M., Larsson, A., Shah, S. I. H., Glinos, M., Koulolias, V., & Danielson, M. (2021) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-020-00702-9 · Cited by 28
A framework for understanding reasoning errors: From fake news to climate change and beyondPreprint
Pennycook, G. (2022) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/j3w7d · Cited by 27
Self-citationUnderstanding and Combating Misinformation Across 16 Countries on Six Continents
Arechar, A. A., Allen, J. N. L., Berinsky, A. J., Cole, R., Epstein, Z., Garimella, K., Gully, A., Lu, J. G., Ross, R. M., Stagnaro, M., et al. (2022) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/a9frz · Cited by 25
Self-citationKeselman, A., Smith, C. A., Gondy Leroy, A., & Kaufman, D. R. (2021) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/30323 · Cited by 29
Combating Fake News on Social Media: A Framework, Review, and Future Opportunities
Nasery, M., Turel, O., & Yuan, Y. (2023) · Communications of the Association for Information Systems · doi:10.17705/1cais.05335 · Cited by 33
Agley, J. D., Xiao, Y., Thompson, E. E., & Golzarri‐Arroyo, L. (2020) · JMIR Research Protocols · doi:10.2196/24383 · Cited by 26
Dharawat, A., Lourentzou, I., Morales, A., & Zhai, C. (2022) · Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media · doi:10.1609/icwsm.v16i1.19372 · Cited by 51
Jerit, J., & Kam, C. D. (2023) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780197541302.013.14 · Cited by 25
Guay, B., Berinsky, A. J., Pennycook, G., & Rand, D. G. (2022) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/y762k · Cited by 25
Self-citationПути российской инфодемии: от WhatsApp до Следственного комитета
Arkhipova, A., Radchenko, D., Козлова, И. В., Пейгин, Б. С., Гаврилова, М. В., & Петров, Н. В. (2020) · Monitoring obŝestvennogo mneniâ: èkonomičeskie i socialʹnye peremeny · doi:10.14515/monitoring.2020.6.1778 · Cited by 28
Creation, dissemination and mitigation: toward a disinformation behavior framework and model
Agarwal, N. K., & Alsaeedi, F. (2021) · Aslib Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1108/ajim-01-2021-0034 · Cited by 24
Jiang, L., Chu, T. H., & Sun, M. (2021) · JMIR Infodemiology · doi:10.2196/25636 · Cited by 27
On the disposition to think analytically: Four distinct intuitive-analytic thinking stylesPreprint
Newton, C., Feeney, J. R., & Pennycook, G. (2021) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/r5wez · Cited by 24
Self-citationFacts and their Discontents: A Research Agenda for Online Disinformation, Race, and GenderPreprint
Thakur, D., & Hankerson, D. L. (2022) · OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/3e8s5 · Cited by 25
Tayal, P., & Bharathi. S, V. (2021) · Journal of Human Behavior in the Social Environment · doi:10.1080/10911359.2020.1825254 · Cited by 23
Psychological preparedness for the COVID-19 pandemic, perspectives from India
Banerjee, D. (2020) · Psychiatry Research · doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2020.112999 · Cited by 23
Machmud, M., Irawan, B., Karinda, K., Susilo, J. B., & Salahudin, S. (2021) · Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies · doi:10.36941/ajis-2021-0087 · Cited by 27
König, L., & Breves, P. L. (2021) · Journal of Science Communication · doi:10.22323/2.20040204 · Cited by 24
Lees, J. M., McCarter, A., & Sarno, D. M. (2022) · Journal of Online Trust and Safety · doi:10.54501/jots.v1i3.39 · Cited by 22
Debriefing works: Successful retraction of misinformation following a fake news study
Greene, C. M., & Murphy, G. (2023) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0280295 · Cited by 23
Kayes, A. S. M., Islam, M. S., Watters, P., Ng, A., & Kayesh, H. (2020) · First Monday · doi:10.5210/fm.v25i11.10599 · Cited by 21
New sources of inaccuracy? A conceptual framework for studying AI hallucinations
Shao, A. (2025) · Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review · doi:10.37016/mr-2020-182 · Cited by 29
Metadata
- Authors
- Pennycook, G., McPhetres, J., Zhang, Y., Lu, J. G., & Rand, D. G.
- Affiliations
- University of Regina (CA)
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
- Corresponding author
- Pennycook, Gordon
- Publisher
- Center for Open Science
- Published
- 2020-03-17
- OpenAlex
- W4232317699
- Cited by
- 390
- References
- 37
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 52 · 2023: 43 · 2022: 67 · 2021: 113 · 2020: 102
- Type
- posted content
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- doi.org
- Locations
- PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
- OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- John Templeton Foundation
- William and Flora Hewlett Foundation
- Miami Foundation
- Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Misinformation and Its Impacts
- Social Sciences › Communication › Communication and COVID-19 Impact
- Social Sciences › Library and Information Sciences › Academic Publishing and Open Access
- Keywords
- COVID-19 misinformation, social media sharing, truth discernment, fake news, cognitive reflection, scientific knowledge
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review