Cited by 335Alzheimer's disease research and treatmentsDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchCholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases

Effects of Regular and Long-Acting Insulin on Cognition and Alzheimer’s Disease Biomarkers: A Pilot Clinical Trial

Open access
Craft, Suzanne, Claxton, Amy, Baker, Laura D., Hanson, Angela J., Cholerton, Brenna, Trittschuh, Emily H., Dahl, Deborah, Caulder, Erin +6 more·2017·Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease

Abstract

Background: Long acting insulin detemir administered intranasally for three weeks enhanced memory for adults with Alzheimer’s disease dementia (AD) or amnestic mild cognitive impairment (MCI). The investigation of longer-term administration is necessary to determine whether benefits persist, whether they are similar to benefits provided by regular insulin, and whether either form of insulin therapy affects AD biomarkers. Objective: The present study aimed to determine whether four months of treatment with intranasal insulin detemir or regular insulin improves cognition, daily functioning, and AD biomarkers for adults with MCI or AD. Methods: This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial included an intent-to-treat sample consisting of 36 adults diagnosed with MCI or mild to moderate AD. Participants received placebo ( n = 12), 40 IU of insulin detemir ( n = 12), or 40 IU of regular insulin ( n = 12) daily for four months, administered with a nasal delivery device. A cognitive battery was administered at baseline and after two and four months of treatment. MRI was administered for all participants and lumbar puncture for a subset ( n = 20) at baseline and four months. The primary outcome was change from baseline to four months on a memory composite (sum of Z scores for delayed list and story recall). Secondary outcomes included: global cognition (Alzheimer’s Disease Assessment Scale-Cognition), daily functioning (Dementia Severity Rating Scale), MRI volume changes in AD-related regions of interest, and cerebrospinal fluid AD markers. Results: The regular insulin treated group had better memory after two and four months compared with placebo ( p < 0.03). No significant effects were observed for the detemir-assigned group compared with the placebo group, or for daily functioning for either group. Regular insulin treatment was associated with preserved volume on MRI. Regular insulin treatment was also associated with reduction in the tau-P181/Aβ 42 ratio. Conclusion: Future research is warranted to examine the mechanistic basis of treatment differences, and to further assess the efficacy and safety of intranasal insulin.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3233/jad-161256

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A device for IN delivery that had been successfully used in previous studies proved unreliable in the first 49 participants because of malfunctions of a newly added electronic timer.

    “A device for IN delivery that had been successfully used in previous studies 75,76,107 proved unreliable in the first 49 participants because of malfunctions of a newly added electronic timer.”

    From Intranasal insulin (2021) · cites this paper as [75]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Craft, S., Claxton, A., Baker, L. D., Hanson, A. J., Cholerton, B., Trittschuh, E. H., Dahl, D., Caulder, E., Neth, B., Montine, T. J., Jung, Y., Maldjian, J., Whitlow, C., & Friedman, S.
Affiliations
  • Wake Forest University Health Sciences (US)
  • Alkermes (United States) (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
  • Stanford Medicine (US)
  • The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
  • Seattle Children's Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Craft, Suzanne
Venue
Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease
Published
2017-03-29
Volume
57
Issue
4
Pages
1325-1334
ISSN
  • 1387-2877 (ISSN-L)
  • 1875-8908
OpenAlex
W2600568015
Cited by
335
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 40 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 47 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 46 · 2020: 49 · 2019: 46 · 2018: 29 · 2017: 8
FWCI
26.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Alzheimer s Disease (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Alzheimer's Association (ZEN-10-173646)
  • National Institute on Aging (P30AG049638)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Cholinesterase and Neurodegenerative Diseases
Keywords
intranasal insulin, insulin detemir
MeSH terms
Activities of Daily Living, Aged, Alzheimer Disease, Brain, Cognition, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Organ Size, Peptide Fragments, Biomarkers, Amyloid beta-Peptides, tau Proteins, Treatment Outcome, Nootropic Agents, Insulins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review