CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 25Psychotherapy Techniques and ApplicationsCounseling Practices and SupervisionPsychology and Mental Health

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Case conceptualization in clinical practice and training

Open access
Gilboa-Schechtman, Eva·2024·Clinical Psychology in Europe
DOI 10.32872/cpe.12103PMC PMC11303933
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Case conceptualization is central to the success of the therapeutic process. However, integrative case conceptualization research has lagged behind research on integrating therapeutic intervention techniques. A successful case conceptualization provides (a) a dynamic, context-sensitive, yet parsimonious model of the client’s functioning; (b) relevant treatment targets and associated assessment procedures; and (c) a treatment plan including intervention phases and potential obstacles. Success in case conceptualization is a core clinical competency goal for trainees in clinical psychology and a career-long learning goal even for expert clinicians. Emerging technological trends and the formation of adversarial collaborative teams may assist research on the utility of well-constructed case conceptualizations.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.32872/cpe.12103

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 42

  1. Bailey, R. J., & Ogles, B. M. (2023). Common factors therapy: A principle-based treatment framework. American Psychological Association. · DOI
  2. Beck, A. T., Rush, A. J., Shaw, B. F., & Emery, G. (1979). Cognitive therapy of depression. Guilford Press.
  3. 10.53841/bpsrep.2011.rep100 · DOI
  4. 10.1016/j.jad.2017.07.044 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1002/jclp.22280 · DOI
  6. 10.1037/xlm0000668 · DOI
  7. 10.1002/jclp.22516 · DOI
  8. 10.14713/pcsp.v9i4.1834 · DOI
  9. 10.1037/14667-000 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Eells, T. D. (Ed.). (2022a). Handbook of psychotherapy case formulation (3rd ed.). Guilford Press.
  11. Eells, T. D. (2022b). History and current status of psychotherapy case formulation. In T. D. Eells (Ed.), Handbook of psychotherapy case formulation (3rd ed., pp. 1–35). Guilford Press.
  12. 10.1037/0022-006X.73.4.579 · DOI
  13. Eubanks, C. F., & Goldfried, M. R. (2019). A principle-based approach to psychotherapy integration. In J. C. Norcross & M. R. Goldfried (Eds.), Handbook of psychotherapy integration (pp. 88–104). Oxford University Press. · DOI
  14. 10.1080/1047840X.2020.1854011 · DOI
  15. 10.17759/cpse.2020090302 · DOI
  16. 10.1016/j.cpr.2008.12.003 · DOI
  17. Hopwood, C. J., Pincus, A. L., & Wright, A. G. C. (2019). The interpersonal situation: Integrating clinical assessment, formulation, and intervention. In D. Samuel & D. Lynam (Eds.), Using basic personality research to inform personality pathology (pp. 94–121). Oxford University Press. · DOI
  18. 10.1001/archpsyc.1995.03950200015003 · DOI
  19. Johnstone, L., & Dallos, R. (Eds.). (2014). Formulation in psychology and psychotherapy: Making sense of people’s problems (2nd ed.). Routledge. · DOI
  20. 10.1037/tra0000222 · DOI
  21. 10.1037/0022-3514.91.5.890 · DOI · Paper page
  22. 10.1037/int0000160 · DOI
  23. Kuyken, W., Padesky, C. A., & Dudley, R. (2009). Collaborative case conceptualization: Working effectively with clients in cognitive-behavioral therapy. Guilford Press.
  24. 10.1002/wps.20888 · DOI
  25. 10.1037/pst0000462 · DOI
  26. McWilliams, N. (2011). Psychoanalytic diagnosis: Understanding personality structure in the clinical process (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.
  27. 10.1080/07351690.2021.1983395 · DOI
  28. 10.1027/1015-5759/a000054 · DOI
  29. 10.1002/cpp.2298 · DOI
  30. 10.1080/00050060801994156 · DOI
  31. Persons, J. B. (2008). The case formulation approach to cognitive-behavior therapy. Guilford Press.
  32. 10.1016/j.cbpra.2022.02.014 · DOI
  33. Persons, J. B., & Hong, J. J. (2015). Case formulation and the outcome of cognitive behaviour therapy. In N. Tarrier & J. Johnson (Eds.), Case formulation in cognitive behaviour therapy: The treatment of challenging and complex cases (pp. 32-55). Routledge. · DOI
  34. 2021, Moving from tradition-based to competence-based psychotherapy., BMJ Mental Health, 115
  35. 10.1002/jclp.23362 · DOI · Paper page
  36. 10.1002/capr.12641 · DOI
  37. Shedler, J. (2022). Integrating clinical and empirical approaches to personality: The Shedler- Westen Assessment Procedure (SWAP). In R. Feinstein (Ed.), Personality disorders (pp. 87–108). Oxford University Press. · DOI
  38. 10.1186/s40359-019-0337-5 · DOI
  39. Sperry, L., & Sperry, J. J. (2020). Case conceptualization: Mastering this competency with ease and confidence (2nd ed.). Routledge. · DOI
  40. 10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115143 · DOI · Paper page
  41. 10.1111/j.1468-2850.2010.01234.x · DOI
  42. 10.1016/j.jad.2016.05.069 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 25

Metadata

Authors
Gilboa-Schechtman, E.
ORCID
Gilboa-Schechtman, Eva
Venue
Clinical Psychology in Europe
Publisher
Leibniz Institute for Psychology (ZPID)
Published
2024-04-26
Volume
6
Issue
Special Issue
Pages
e12103-e12103
ISSN
2625-3410 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.32872/cpe.12103
PMC
PMC11303933
OpenAlex
W4394606676
Cited by
25
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 4
FWCI
9.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Clinical Psychology in Europe (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PsychOpen Gold (Leibniz Institute for Psychology) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Psychology Archives (cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Counseling Practices and Supervision
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychology and Mental Health
Keywords
case formulation, clinical psychology training, clinical competence, treatment planning, treatment goals, therapeutic process, clinical psychology practice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review