Cited by 37Water Governance and InfrastructureWater Resource Management and QualityChild Nutrition and Water Access

Multi-level sanitation governance: understanding and overcoming challenges in the sanitation sector in sub-Saharan Africa

Nelson Ekane, Nelson Ekane, Björn Nykvist, Björn Nykvist, Marianne Kjellén, Marianne Kjellén, Stacey Noel, Stacey Noel, Nina Weitz, Nina Weitz·2014·Waterlines

Abstract

The provision of sanitation facilities - a basic necessity for human health, well-being, dignity, and development - remains a mammoth challenge for developing countries where the vast majority of the 2.5 billion people without improved sanitation facilities reside. Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) is one of the regions where decent, dignified, and functional toilet facilities remain largely inaccessible. Most of the countries in SSA will miss the Millennium Development Goal (MDG) for sanitation. There are sharp contradictions in the region between formal and informal sanitation institutions. There is also a disconnect between actors at the macro, meso, and micro governance levels. This paper shows how multi-level governance analysis, path dependency, and institutional inertia can be used to improve understanding of some challenges in the sanitation sector in SSA, and discusses approaches that can contribute to improving the sanitation situation in a sustainable way. In addition, the paper asserts that demand-driven strategies and private sector involvement in the sanitation sector is paramount for establishing new sanitation paradigms and sociotechnical regimes. We conclude that a good understanding of actors at all levels - their various roles, interactions, and the way they interpret and respond to policies - is key to accelerating progress in sustainable sanitation coverage in SSA.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3362/1756-3488.2014.024

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nelson Ekane, N. E., Björn Nykvist, B. N., Marianne Kjellén, M. K., Stacey Noel, S. N., & Nina Weitz, N. W.
Venue
Waterlines
Published
2014-07-01
Volume
33
Issue
3
Pages
242-256
ISSN
  • 0262-8104 (ISSN-L)
  • 1756-3488
OpenAlex
W2154716580
Cited by
37
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 7 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1
FWCI
17.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Waterlines (publishedVersion)
  • University of Twente Research Information (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Water Governance and Infrastructure
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Water Resource Management and Quality
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Child Nutrition and Water Access
Keywords
sanitation governance, multi-level governance, sub-Saharan Africa, path dependence, institutional inertia, private sector participation, socio-technical regimes, sanitation coverage, policy implementation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review