Cited by 1,468Labor market dynamics and wage inequalityEconomic Growth and ProductivitySchool Choice and Performance

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Formulating, Identifying and Estimating the Technology of Cognitive and Noncognitive Skill Formation

Cunha, Flavio, Heckman, James J.·2008·Journal of Human Resources

Abstract

Minneapolis Federal Reserve, October 2003. We received helpful comments from Robert Pollak at a seminar at Washington University, February 2005. A website for supplementary material is available at

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3368/jhr.43.4.738

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Cunha, Heckman and Schennach [2010] and Cunha and Heckman [2008] allow the latent factor to determine investment and experience.

    “Cunha, Heckman and Schennach [2010] and Cunha and Heckman [2008] allow for the latent factor to determine investment and experience.”

    From Personality Psychology and Economics (2011) · cites this paper as Cunha and Heckman [2008]

  • Cunha and Heckman [2008] show a correlation between cognitive and personality factors of the order of 0.3.

    “Cunha and Heckman [2008] show a correlation between cognitive and personality factors of the order of 0.3 r  .”

    From Personality Psychology and Economics (2011) · cites this paper as Cunha and Heckman [2008]

  • Accounting for measurement error and endogeneity is empirically important.

    “Cunha and Heckman [2008] and Cunha, Heckman and Schennach [2010] estimate these models on panel data on the growth dynamics of individuals and show that accounting for measurement error and endogeneity is empirically important.”

    From Personality Psychology and Economics (2011) · cites this paper as Cunha and Heckman [2008]

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Cunha, F., & Heckman, J. J.
Affiliations
University of Chicago (US)
Venue
Journal of Human Resources
Published
2008
Volume
43
Issue
4
Pages
738-782
ISSN
  • 0022-166X (ISSN-L)
  • 1548-8004
OpenAlex
W2137023356
Cited by
1,468
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 46 · 2025: 66 · 2024: 73 · 2023: 70 · 2022: 87 · 2021: 90 · 2020: 131 · 2019: 85 · 2018: 84 · 2017: 93 · 2016: 99 · 2015: 88 · 2014: 99 · 2013: 75 · 2012: 75
FWCI
133.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Human Resources (publishedVersion)
  • Project Muse (Johns Hopkins University) (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Labor market dynamics and wage inequality
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic Growth and Productivity
  • Social Sciences › Education › School Choice and Performance
Keywords
cognitive skills, non-cognitive skills, skill development, human capital, skill complementarity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review