Cited by 3CRISPR and Genetic EngineeringBacterial Genetics and BiotechnologyMicrobial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction

Cyanobacterial type I CRISPR-Cas systems: distribution, mechanisms, and genome editing applications

Open access
Zhang, Yongjiu, Yang, Shuxiao, Zheng, Xianliang, Tan, Xiaoming·2025·Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology

Abstract

Cyanobacteria, renowned for their photosynthetic capabilities, serve as efficient microbial chassis capable of converting carbon dioxide into a spectrum of bio-chemicals. However, conventional genetic manipulation strategies have proven incompatible with the precise and systematic modifications required in the field of cyanobacterial synthetic biology. Here, we present an in-depth analysis of endogenous CRISPR-Cas systems within cyanobacterial genomes, with a particular focus on the Type I systems, which are the most widely distributed. We provide a comprehensive summary of the reported DNA defense mechanisms mediated by cyanobacterial Type I CRISPR-Cas systems and their current applications in genome editing. Furthermore, we offer insights into the future applications of these systems in the context of cyanobacterial genome editing, underscoring their potential to revolutionize synthetic biology approaches.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fbioe.2025.1552030

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Ongoing advancements in CRISPR technology are broadening the scope of cyanobacterial genetic engineering and are poised to play a progressively significant role in developing engineered photosynthetic biotechnologies.

    “Nonetheless, ongoing advancements in CRISPR technology are broadening the scope of cyanobacterial genetic engineering and are poised to play a progressively significant role in developing engineered photosynthetic biotechnologies [116,121].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhang, Y., Yang, S., Zheng, X., & Tan, X.
Affiliations
State Key Laboratory of Biocatalysis and Enzyme Engineering (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Zheng, Xianliang
  • Tan, Xiaoming
Venue
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
Published
2025-02-27
Volume
13
Pages
1552030-1552030
ISSN
2296-4185 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4408005540
Cited by
3
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2
FWCI
0.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China (31871303)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction
Keywords
cyanobacteria, genome editing, microbial chassis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review