Cited by 3CRISPR and Genetic EngineeringMicrobial Metabolic Engineering and BioproductionBacterial Genetics and Biotechnology

Repurposing endogenous Type I-D CRISPR-Cas system for genome editing in Synechococcus sp. PCC7002

Open access
Yang, Shuxiao, Zhang, Yongjiu, Li, Chunyan, Tan, Xiaoming·2024·Microbiological Research

Abstract

Synechococcus sp. PCC7002 has been considered as a photosynthetic chassis for the conversion of CO 2 into biochemicals through genetic modification. However, conventional genetic manipulation techniques prove inadequate for comprehensive genetic modifications in this strain. Here, we present the development of a genome editing tool tailored for S. PCC7002, leveraging its endogenous type I-D CRISPR-Cas system. Utilizing this novel tool, we successfully deleted the glgA1 gene and iteratively edited the genome to obtain a double mutant of glgA1 and glgA2 genes. Additionally, large DNA fragments encompassing the entire type I-A (∼14 kb) or III-B CRISPR-Cas (∼21 kb) systems were completely knocked-out in S. PCC7002 using our tool. Furthermore, the endogenous pAQ5 plasmid, approximately 38 kb in length, was successfully cured from S. PCC7002. Our work demonstrates the feasibility of harnessing the endogenous CRISPR-Cas system for genome editing in S. PCC7002, thereby enriching the genetic toolkit for this species and providing a foundation for future enhancements in its biosynthetic efficiency.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.micres.2024.127884

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Marker-free multiplex genome editing via optimised CRISPR-Cas12a has been demonstrated in Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 and the endogenous Type I-D CRISPR-Cas system of Synechococcus sp. PCC 7002 has been repurposed for scarless gene deletions using native cyanobacterial machinery.

    “Marker-free multiplex genome editing via optimised CRISPR-Cas12a has been demonstrated in Synechocystis sp. PCC 6803 [122] and the endogenous Type I-D CRISPR-Cas system of Synechococcus sp. PCC 7002 has been repurposed for scarless gene deletions using native cyanobacterial machinery [123].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yang, S., Zhang, Y., Li, C., & Tan, X.
Affiliations
State Key Laboratory of Biocatalysis and Enzyme Engineering (CN)
Venue
Microbiological Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-11
Volume
288
Pages
127884
ISSN
0944-5013 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4401945004
Cited by
3
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1
FWCI
0.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Microbiological Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China (31871303)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Bacterial Genetics and Biotechnology
Keywords
genome editing
MeSH terms
Gene Editing, Bacterial Proteins, Plasmids, Genome, Bacterial, Gene Deletion, Synechococcus, CRISPR-Cas Systems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review