Cited by 34Antifungal resistance and susceptibilityFungal and yeast genetics researchBacterial biofilms and quorum sensing

Trichosporon asahii and Trichosporon inkin biofilms produce antifungal-tolerant persister cells

Open access
Cordeiro, Rossana de Aguiar, Aguiar, Ana Luiza Ribeiro, da Silva, Bruno Nascimento, Pereira, Lívia Maria Galdino, Portela, Fernando Victor Monteiro, de Camargo, Zoilo Pires, de Lima-Neto, Reginaldo Gonçalves, Castelo-Branco, Débora de Souza Collares Maia +2 more·2021·Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology

Abstract

Persister cells are metabolically inactive dormant cells that lie within microbial biofilms. They are phenotypic variants highly tolerant to antimicrobials and, therefore, associated with recalcitrant infections. In the present study, we investigated if Trichosporon asahii and T. inkin are able to produce persister cells.Trichosporon spp. are ubiquitous fungi, commonly found as commensals of the human skin and gut microbiota, and have been increasingly reported as agents of fungemia in immunocompromised patients. Biofilms derived from clinical strains of T asahii(n=5) and T. inkin(n=7) were formed in flat-bottomed microtiter plates and incubated at 35°C for 48 h, treated with 100 μg/ml amphotericin B (AMB) and incubated at 35°C for additional 24 h. Biofilms were scraped from the wells and persister cells were assayed for susceptibility to AMB. Additionally, we investigated if these persister cells were able to generate new biofilms and studied their ultrastructure and AMB susceptibility. Persister cells were detected in both T asahii and T. inkin biofilms and showed tolerance to high doses of AMB (up to 256 times higher than the minimum inhibitory concentration). Persister cells were able to generate biofilms, however they presented reduced biomass and metabolic activity, and reduced tolerance to AMB, in comparison to biofilm growth control. The present study describes the occurrence of persister cells in Trichosporon spp. and suggests their role in the reduced AMB susceptibility of T.asahii and T. inkin biofilms.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fcimb.2021.645812

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Amphotericin B has been widely studied and shown to induce antifungal persistence in Candida spp. biofilms and Trichosporon spp.

    “Amphotericin B which belongs to polyenes class, due to its potent fungicidal activity and the rarity of resistance [35–37], has been widely studied and shown to induce antifungal persistence in Candida spp. biofilms and Trichosporon spp.”

    From Antifungal persistence: Clinical relevance and mechanisms (2025) · cites this paper as [37]

    The Discussion reports amphotericin B-tolerant persister cells in Candida biofilms and surviving cells in amphotericin B-treated Trichosporon biofilms. It does not show that the drug induces those cells, rather than revealing cells that survive exposure. The Introduction also says few studies had addressed antifungal-resistance mechanisms in Trichosporon, so 'widely studied' is not supported for that genus. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. CLSI (2008). “ Reference Method for Broth Dilution Antifungal Susceptibility Testing of Yeasts; Approved Standard - Third Edition,” in CLSI document M27-A3. Wayne, PA, USA.
  2. De Hoog G. S. Guarro J. Gene´ J. Figueiras M. J. (2000). Atlas of Clinical Fungi. 2nd ed (Washington: ASM Press).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cordeiro, R. D. A., Aguiar, A. L. R., da Silva, B. N., Pereira, L. M. G., Portela, F. V. M., de Camargo, Z. P., de Lima-Neto, R. G., Castelo-Branco, D. D. S. C. M., Rocha, M. F. G., & Sidrim, J. J. C.
Affiliations
  • Universidade Federal do Ceará (BR)
  • Universidade Estadual do Ceará (BR)
Corresponding author
Cordeiro, Rossana de Aguiar
Venue
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
Published
2021-04-22
Volume
11
Pages
645812-645812
ISSN
2235-2988 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3160946572
Cited by
34
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 1
FWCI
1.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (430193/2018-1)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Fungal and yeast genetics research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bacterial biofilms and quorum sensing
Keywords
Trichosporon asahii, Trichosporon inkin, persister cells, biofilm, antifungal tolerance, amphotericin B, fungemia, recalcitrant infection, biofilm ultrastructure, clinical isolates
MeSH terms
Antifungal Agents, Basidiomycota, Humans, Microbial Sensitivity Tests, Trichosporon, Biofilms

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review