Cited by 64Antifungal resistance and susceptibilityFungal Infections and StudiesYeasts and Rust Fungi Studies

Retrospective analysis of the clinical characteristics of Candida auris infection worldwide from 2009 to 2020

Open access
Hu, Shan, Zhu, Feilong, Jiang, Weiwei, Wang, Yuehua, Quan, Yongqiang, Zhang, Guoming, Gu, Feng, Yang, Ying·2021·Frontiers in Microbiology

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Introduction: Candida auris is an emerging multidrug-resistant fungus that may cause infections with a high mortality rate. The first case of C. auris infection was reported in 2009 and infections have been reported in 44 countries. The fungus now represents a major global public health threat. We analyzed cases from the emergence of C. auris infections up until the end of 2020. It is hoped that the results of this analysis will raise awareness in scientists to promote protection and control research pertaining to this pathogen. Methods: PubMed and Web of Science databases were searched for all papers related to C. auris infections up until December 31, 2020. We sorted and organized these data into the following categories: date of publication, patient age and sex, underlying diseases, risk factors for infection, patient mortality information, drug sensitivity information of C. auris isolates, and genetic classification. The χ 2 test was used to screen for factors that may affect patient mortality. Results: A total of 912 patients were included in the analysis. There’s a higher proportion of men and a high proportion of patients were premature babies and elderly people. The proportions of patients with underlying diseases such as diabetes, kidney disease, trauma, and ear disease were also high. More than half of patients had a history of central venous catheter use and a history of broad-spectrum antibiotic use. The χ 2 test revealed that only kidney disease ( P < 0.05) was an important risk factor for mortality in C. auris- infected patients. Conclusions: A comprehensive understanding of C. auris was achieved following this retrospective analysis, including the characteristics of C. auris -infected patients. In recent years, increasing numbers of multidrug-resistant C. auris isolates have been identified, and the high mortality rates associated with infection merit greater attention from the medical world.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fmicb.2021.658329

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Additional clinical conditions associated with C. auris colonization and/or systemic infection include chronic kidney disease, hemodialysis, malignancy, central venous or urinary catheterization, and total parenteral nutrition, mirroring known risk factors for infections by other Candida species.

    “Additional clinical conditions associated with C. auris colonization and/or systemic infection include chronic kidney disease, hemodialysis, malignancy, central venous or urinary catheterization, and total parenteral nutrition, mirroring known risk factors for infections by other Candida species [45,46,59].”

    From Host–Candida auris interactions in the skin (2026) · cites this paper as [46]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 1 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • C. auris skin colonization frequently occurs in patients recently exposed to prolonged courses of broad-spectrum antibiotics, particularly carbapenems and vancomycin, with 43.3% of colonized patients treated with carbapenems, and 41.7% with vancomycin.

    “C. auris skin colonization frequently occurs in patients recently exposed to prolonged courses of broad-spectrum antibiotics, particularly carbapenems and vancomycin, with 43.3% of colonized patients treated with carbapenems, and 41.7% with vancomycin [40–43,45–47].”

    From Host–Candida auris interactions in the skin (2026) · cites this paper as [46]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 35

  1. Agrawal P. B. Narang A. Kumar P. (1996). Fluconazole. Indian J. Pediatr. 63 775– 780. 10.1007/BF02730928 10830059 · DOI
  2. Biswal M. Rudramurthy S. M. Jain N. Shamanth A. S. Sharma D. Jain K. (2017). Controlling a possible outbreak of Candida auris infection: lessons learnt from multiple interventions. J. Hosp. Infect. 97 363– 370. 10.1016/j.jhin.2017.09.009 28939316 · DOI
  3. Calvo B. Melo A. S. A. Perozo-Mena A. Hernandez M. Francisco E. C. Hagen F. (2016). First report of Candida auris in America: clinical and microbiological aspects of 18 episodes of candidemia. J. Infect. 73 369– 374. 10.1016/j.jinf.2016.07.008 27452195 · DOI
  4. Chowdhary A. Prakash A. Sharma C. Kordalewska M. Kumar A. Sarma S. (2018). A multicentre study of antifungal susceptibility patterns among 350 Candida auris isolates (2009-17) in India: role of the ERG11 and FKS1 genes in azole and echinocandin resistance. J. Antimicrob, Chemother. 73 891– 899. 10.1093/jac/dkx480 29325167 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Chowdhary A. Sharma C. Duggal S. Agarwal K. Prakash A. Singh P. K. (2013). New clonal strain of Candida auris, Delhi, India. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 19 1670– 1673. 10.3201/eid1910.130393 24048006 PMC3810747 · DOI
  6. Chowdhary A. Voss A. Meis J. F. (2016). Multidrug-resistant Candida auris: ‘new kid on the block’ in hospital-associated infections? J. Hosp. Infect. 94 209– 212. 10.1016/j.jhin.2016.08.004 27634564 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Collister D. Rigatto C. Tangri N. (2017). Anemia management in chronic kidney disease and dialysis: a narrative review. Curr. Opin. Nephrol. Hypertens. 26 214– 218. 10.1097/MNH.0000000000000317 28306566 · DOI
  8. Cortegiani A. Misseri G. Giarratano A. Bassetti M. Eyre D. (2019). The global challenge of Candida auris in the intensive care unit. Crit. Care 23: 150. 10.1186/s13054-019-2449-y 31046836 PMC6495550 · DOI
  9. Emara M. Ahmad S. Khan Z. Joseph L. Al-Obaid I. Purohit P. (2015). Candida auris candidemia in Kuwait, 2014. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 21 1091– 1092. 10.3201/eid2106.150270 25989098 PMC4451886 · DOI
  10. Farina C. Manso E. Andreoni S. Conte M. Fazii P. Lombardi G. (2011). Interlaboratory evaluation of VITEK2 system and Sensititre YeastOne® for antifungal susceptibility testing of yeasts isolated from blood cultures against four antifungal agents. New Microbiol. 34 195– 201. 21617832
  11. Jeffery-Smith A. Taori S. K. Schelenz S. Jeffery K. Johnson E. M. Borman A. (2018). Candida auris: a review of the literature. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 31: e00029-17. 10.1128/CMR.00029-17 29142078 PMC5740969 · DOI
  12. Kathuria S. Singh P. K. Sharma C. Prakash A. Masih A. Kumar A. (2015). Multidrug-Resistant Candida auris misidentified as Candida haemulonii: characterization by matrix-assisted laser desorption Ionization–Time of flight mass spectrometry and DNA sequencing and its antifungal susceptibility profile variability by Vitek 2, CLSI Broth microdilution, and etest method. J. Clin. Microbiol. 53 1823– 1830. 10.1128/JCM.00367-15 25809970 PMC4432077 · DOI
  13. Kordalewska M. Lee A. Park S. Berrio I. Chowdhary A. Zhao Y. (2018). Understanding echinocandin resistance in the emerging pathogen Candida auris. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 62: e00238-18. 10.1128/AAC.00238-18 29632013 PMC5971591 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Lara H. H. Ixtepan-Turrent L. Jose Yacaman M. Lopez-Ribot J. (2020). Inhibition of Candida auris biofilm formation on medical and environmental surfaces by silver nanoparticles. Acs Appl. Mater. Inter. 12 21183– 21191. 10.1021/acsami.9b20708 31944650 PMC8243355 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Larkin E. Hager C. Chandra J. Mukherjee P. K. Retuerto M. Salem I. (2017). The emerging pathogen Candida auris: growth phenotype, virulence factors, activity of antifungals, and effect of SCY-078, a novel glucan synthesis inhibitor, on growth morphology and biofilm formation. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 61: e02396-16. 10.1128/AAC.02396-16 28223375 PMC5404565 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Lockhart S. R. Etienne K. A. Vallabhaneni S. Farooqi J. Chowdhary A. Govender N. P. (2016). Simultaneous emergence of multidrug-resistant Candida auris on 3 continents confirmed by whole-genome sequencing and epidemiological analyses. Clin. Infect. Dis. 64 134– 140. 10.1093/cid/ciw691 27988485 PMC5215215 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Madder H. Moir I. Moroney R. Butcher L. Newnham R. Sunderland M. (2017). Multiuse patient monitoring equipment as a risk factor for acquisition of Candida auris. bioRxiv [Preprint]. 10.1101/149054 · DOI
  18. Meis J. F. Chowdhary A. (2018). Candida auris: a global fungal public health threat. Lancet Infect. Dis. 18 1298– 1299. 10.1016/S1473-3099(18)30609-1 30293876 · DOI
  19. Mejia-Chew C. O’halloran J. A. Olsen M. A. Stwalley D. Kronen R. Lin C. (2019). Effect of infectious disease consultation on mortality and treatment of patients with candida bloodstream infections: a retrospective, cohort study. Lancet Infect. Dis. 19 1336– 1344. 10.1016/S1473-3099(19)30405-0 31562024 PMC7014922 · DOI
  20. Muñoz J. F. Gade L. Chow N. A. Loparev V. N. Juieng P. Berkow E. L. (2018). Genomic insights into multidrug-resistance, mating and virulence in Candida auris and related emerging species. Nat. Commun. 9: 5346. 10.1038/s41467-018-07779-6 30559369 PMC6297351 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Nancy A. C. Theun De G. Hamid B. Abastabar M. Chiller T. M. Meis J. F. (2019). Potential fifth clade of Candida auris, Iran, 2018. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 25 1780– 1781. 10.3201/eid2509.190686 31310230 PMC6711235 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Navalkele B. D. Revankar S. Chandrasekar P. (2017). Candida auris: a worrisome, globally emerging pathogen. Expert Rev. Anti Infect. 15 819– 827. 10.1080/14787210.2017.1364992 28783385 · DOI
  23. Oh B. J. Shin J. H. Kim M. N. Sung H. Lee K. Joo M. Y. (2011). Biofilm formation and genotyping of Candida haemulonii, Candida pseudohaemulonii, and a proposed new species (Candida auris) isolates from Korea. Med. Mycol. 49 98– 102. 10.3109/13693786.2010.493563 20560864 · DOI
  24. Ostrowsky B. Greenko J. Adams E. Quinn M. O’Brien B. Chaturvedi V. (2020). Candida auris Isolates resistant to three classes of antifungal medications - New York, 2019. MMWR Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 69 6– 9. 10.15585/mmwr.mm6901a2 31917780 PMC6973342 · DOI
  25. Palazón-Bru A. Tomás-Rodríguez M. I. López-Cascales M. T. Folgado-de la Rosa D. M. Gil-Guillén V. F. (2017). Multivariate ordered logistic regression models: dealing with the model-building strategy. J. Pediatr. Adol. Gynec. 30: 664. 10.1016/j.jpag.2017.06.006 28663155 · DOI
  26. Park J. Y. Bradley N. Brooks S. Burney S. Wassner C. (2019). Management of patients with Candida auris fungemia at community hospital, Brooklyn, New York, USA, 2016–2018. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 25 601– 602. 10.3201/eid2503.180927 30789336 PMC6390749 · DOI
  27. Rhee C. M. Ahmadi S. F. Kovesdy C. P. Kalantar-Zadeh K. (2018). Low-protein diet for conservative management of chronic kidney disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled trials. J. Cachexia Sarcopenia Muscle 9 235– 245. 10.1002/jcsm.12264 29094800 PMC5879959 · DOI
  28. Rhodes J. Abdolrasouli A. Farrer R. A. Cuomo C. A. Aanensen D. M. Armstrong-James D. (2018). Genomic epidemiology of the UK outbreak of the emerging human fungal pathogen Candida auris. Emerg. Microbes Infect. 7: 43. 10.1038/s41426-018-0045-x 29593275 PMC5874254 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Rindidzani E. M. Craig C. Sharona S. Govender N. P. (2014). Candida auris–Associated Candidemia, South Africa. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 20 1250– 1251. 10.3201/eid2007.131765 24963796 PMC4073876 · DOI · Paper page
  30. Rybak J. M. Doorley L. A. Nishimoto A. T. Barker K. S. Palmer G. E. Rogers P. D. (2019). Abrogation of triazole resistance upon deletion of CDR1 in a clinical Isolate of Candida auris. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 63: e00057-19. 10.1128/AAC.00057-19 30718246 PMC6437491 · DOI · Paper page
  31. Satoh K. Makimura K. Hasumi Y. Nishiyama Y. Uchida K. Yamaguchi H. (2009). Candida auris sp. nov., a novel ascomycetous yeast isolated from the external ear canal of an inpatient in a Japanese hospital. Microbiol. Immunol. 53 41– 44. 10.1111/j.1348-0421.2008.00083.x 19161556 · DOI · Paper page
  32. Shaukat A. Al Ansari N. Al Wali W. Karic E. El Madhoun I. Mitwally H. (2020). Experience of treating Candida auris cases at a general hospital in the state of Qatar. IDCases 23: e01007. 10.1016/j.idcr.2020.e01007 33299794 PMC7702000 · DOI
  33. Tan J. Liu Z. Sun Y. Yang L. Gao L. (2019). Inhibitory effects of photodynamic inactivation on planktonic cells and biofilms of Candida auris. Mycopathologia 184 525– 531. 10.1007/s11046-019-00352-9 31230199 · DOI
  34. Vatanshenassan M. Boekhout T. Meis J. F. Berman J. Chowdhary A. Ben-Ami R. (2019). Candida auris identification and rapid antifungal susceptibility testing against echinocandins by MALDI-TOF MS. Front. Cell Infect. Microbiol. 9: 20. 10.3389/fcimb.2019.00020 30834236 PMC6387932 · DOI
  35. Wang T. Jia Y. Chu B. Liu H. Dong X. Zhang Y. (2019). Nocardiosis in kidney disease patients under immunosuppressive therapy: case report and literature review. Int. J. Med. Sci. 16 838– 844. 10.7150/ijms.32440 31337957 PMC6643105 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hu, S., Zhu, F., Jiang, W., Wang, Y., Quan, Y., Zhang, G., Gu, F., & Yang, Y.
Affiliations
  • Xuzhou Medical College (CN)
  • Hebei University (CN)
  • Second Military Medical University (CN)
  • Xuzhou Cancer Hospital (CN)
Corresponding author
Yang, Ying
Venue
Frontiers in Microbiology
Published
2021-05-20
Volume
12
Pages
658329-658329
ISSN
1664-302X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3161498394
Cited by
64
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3
FWCI
2.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Microbiology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • medRxiv (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Ministry of Science and Technology of the People’s Republic of China (2018ZX10101003, 2018ZX10712-001)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Fungal Infections and Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Yeasts and Rust Fungi Studies
Keywords
Candida auris, candidiasis, multidrug resistance, mortality risk factors, kidney disease, central venous catheters, broad-spectrum antibiotic use, preterm infants, elderly patients, genetic classification, emerging fungal infections

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review