Cited by 356Antifungal resistance and susceptibilityYeasts and Rust Fungi StudiesFungal Infections and Studies

Potential Fifth Clade of Candida auris, Iran, 2018

Open access
Chow, Nancy A., de Groot, Theun, Badali, Hamid, Abastabar, Mahdi, Chiller, Tom M., Meis, Jacques F.·2019·Emerging Infectious Diseases

Abstract

Four major clades of Candida auris have been described, and all infections have clustered in these 4 clades. We identified an isolate representative of a potential fifth clade, separated from the other clades by >200,000 single-nucleotide polymorphisms, in a patient in Iran who had never traveled outside the country.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3201/eid2509.190686

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Whole-genome sequencing and epidemiologic investigations have revealed near simultaneous emergence of genetically distinct clades of C. auris on different continents: East Asia, South Asia, South America, and Africa, with a potential fifth Iranian clade.

    “Whole-genome sequencing and epidemiologic investigations have revealed near simultaneous emergence of genetically distinct clades of C. auris on different continents: East Asia, South Asia, South America, and Africa (Lockhart et al., 2017), with a potential fifth Iranian clade (Chow et al., 2019).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. [2]Saris K, Meis JF, Voss A. Candida auris. Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2018; 31: 334– 40. 29878905
  2. [3]Welsh RM, Bentz ML, Shams A, Houston H, Lyons A, Rose LJ, et al. Survival, persistence, and isolation of the emerging multidrug-resistant pathogenic yeast Candida auris on a plastic healthcare surface. J Clin Microbiol. 2017; 55: 2996– 3005. 10.1128/JCM.00921-17 28747370 PMC5625385 · DOI · Paper page
  3. [4]Lockhart SR, Etienne KA, Vallabhaneni S, Farooqi J, Chowdhary A, Govender NP, et al. Simultaneous emergence of multidrug-resistant Candida auris on 3 continents confirmed by whole-genome sequencing and epidemiological analyses. Clin Infect Dis. 2017; 64: 134– 40. 10.1093/cid/ciw691 27988485 PMC5215215 · DOI · Paper page
  4. [6]Escandón P, Chow NA, Caceres DH, Gade L, Berkow EL, Armstrong P, et al. Molecular epidemiology of Candida auris in Colombia reveals a highly related, countrywide colonization with regional patterns in amphotericin B resistance. Clin Infect Dis. 2019; 68: 15– 21. 29788045
  5. [7]Rhodes J, Abdolrasouli A, Farrer RA, Cuomo CA, Aanensen DM, Armstrong-James D, et al. Genomic epidemiology of the UK outbreak of the emerging human fungal pathogen Candida auris. Emerg Microbes Infect. 2018; 7: 43. 10.1038/s41426-018-0045-x 29593275 PMC5874254 · DOI · Paper page
  6. [8]Abastabar M, Haghani I, Ahangarkani F, Rezai MS, Taghizadeh Armaki M, Roodgari S, et al. Candida auris otomycosis in Iran and review of recent literature. Mycoses. 2019; 62: 101– 5. 10.1111/myc.12886 30585653 · DOI
  7. [9]Welsh RM, Sexton DJ, Forsberg K, Vallabhaneni S, Litvintseva A. Insights into the unique nature of the East Asian clade of the emerging pathogenic yeast Candida auris. J Clin Microbiol. 2019; 57: e00007– 00019. 10.1128/JCM.00007-19 30760535 PMC6440783 · DOI
  8. [10]Kwon YJ, Shin JH, Byun SA, Choi MJ, Won EJ, Lee D, et al. Candida auris clinical isolates from South Korea: Identification, antifungal susceptibility, and genotyping. J Clin Microbiol. 2019; 57: e01624– 18. 10.1128/JCM.01624-18 30728190 PMC6440790 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chow, N. A., de Groot, T., Badali, H., Abastabar, M., Chiller, T. M., & Meis, J. F.
Affiliations
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US)
Corresponding author
Meis, Jacques F.
Venue
Emerging Infectious Diseases
Published
2019-09
Volume
25
Issue
9
Pages
1780-1781
ISSN
  • 1080-6040 (ISSN-L)
  • 1080-6059
OpenAlex
W2956528092
Cited by
356
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 28 · 2025: 43 · 2024: 52 · 2023: 61 · 2022: 47 · 2021: 61 · 2020: 48 · 2019: 16
FWCI
32.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Emerging infectious diseases (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Yeasts and Rust Fungi Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Fungal Infections and Studies
Keywords
Candida auris, clade identification, single nucleotide polymorphisms, fungal genotyping, nosocomial fungal infections, Iran
MeSH terms
Whole Genome Sequencing, Adolescent, Candida, Candidiasis, Female, Humans, Iran, Travel, Otomycosis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review