Cited by 141Antifungal resistance and susceptibilityFungal Plant Pathogen ControlFungal and yeast genetics research

Abrogation of Triazole Resistance upon Deletion of CDR1 in a Clinical Isolate of Candida auris

Open access
Rybak, Jeffrey M., Doorley, Laura A., Nishimoto, Andrew T., Barker, Katherine S., Palmer, Glen E., Rogers, P. David·2019·Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy

Abstract

Candida auris has rapidly emerged as a health care-associated and multidrug-resistant pathogen of global concern. In this work, we examined the relative expression of the four C. auris genes with the highest degree of homology to Candida albicans CDR1 and MDR1 among three triazole-resistant clinical isolates as compared to the triazole-susceptible genome reference clinical isolate.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1128/aac.00057-19

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [15]Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. 2017. Reference method for broth dilution antifungal susceptibility testing of yeast; approved standard—4th ed. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, Wayne, PA. [Google Scholar]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rybak, J. M., Doorley, L. A., Nishimoto, A. T., Barker, K. S., Palmer, G. E., & Rogers, P. D.
Affiliations
University of Tennessee Health Science Center (US)
Venue
Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy
Published
2019-04
Volume
63
Issue
4
ISSN
  • 0066-4804 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-6596
OpenAlex
W2913720564
Cited by
141
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 22 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 8
FWCI
13.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
HHS | NIH | National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (R01 A1058145)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Fungal Plant Pathogen Control
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Fungal and yeast genetics research
Keywords
Candida auris, triazole resistance, CDR1, multidrug resistance, gene deletion, clinical isolates, antifungal resistance, multidrug resistance genes
MeSH terms
Microorganisms, Genetically-Modified, CRISPR-Associated Protein 9, Antifungal Agents, Candida, Candidiasis, Fungal Proteins, Humans, Microbial Sensitivity Tests, Triazoles, Fluconazole, Gene Expression Regulation, Fungal, Gene Deletion, ATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily B, Member 1, Drug Resistance, Fungal, Membrane Transport Proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review