Cited by 17Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchMemory and Neural MechanismsAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Translational fear inhibition models as indices of trauma-related psychopathology

D. Norrholm, Seth, Jovanovic, Tanja·2011·Current Psychiatry Reviews

Abstract

Posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is a debilitating psychiatric condition that arises from exposure to a traumatic event such as combat exposure, a vehicular accident, or an act of violence. The symptom clusters of PTSD include hyperarousal and re-experiencing of the traumatic event when exposed to trauma reminders, as well as avoidance of such reminders. The fear-and anxiety-related symptoms of PTSD can be conceptualized, and subsequently modeled, as the result of fear conditioning such that the traumatic event serves as an unconditioned stimulus and the environmental cues present at the time of the trauma serve as conditioned stimuli that can ultimately elicit conditioned fear responses (i.e., clinical symptoms) long after the trauma has occurred. Many of the most successful treatments for anxiety disorders such as PTSD are based on the principles of fear extinction in which the repeated presentation of a conditioned stimulus, without noxious consequences, reduces the frequency and intensity of a conditioned response. In the current review, we discuss the most widely employed psychophysiological protocols that have been used to study fear processing in human populations, both psychiatrically healthy and with PTSD. Special emphasis is placed on how translational clinical research can inform clinical practices and vice versa. Keywords: Anxiety, fear, posttraumatic stress disorder, psychophysiology, translation, treatment outcome, heuristics, co-morbid PTSD, neutral cue, hyperventilation, trauma-exposed, psychophysiological measures, progesterone

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2174/157340011797183193

Cites

63 of 63 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The authors previously showed that a predominately male population of combat veterans with PTSD did not show 'fear load,' but rather impaired within-session extinction learning characterized by a 'persistence of fear'.

    “As an example, we previously showed that a predominately male population of combat veterans with PTSD did not show “fear load,” but rather impaired within-session extinction learning characterized by a “persistence of fear” (40).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
D. Norrholm, S., & Jovanovic, T.
Venue
Current Psychiatry Reviews
Published
2011-08-01
Volume
7
Issue
3
Pages
194-204
ISSN
1573-4005 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2329975296
Cited by
17
References
63
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1
FWCI
1.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Current Psychiatry Reviews (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
post-traumatic stress disorder, fear conditioning, fear extinction, fear inhibition, psychophysiological measures, trauma exposure, anxiety, hyperarousal, avoidance, progesterone, translational research, treatment outcomes, trauma-related psychopathology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review