Cited by 120Memory and Neural MechanismsMemory Processes and InfluencesPosttraumatic Stress Disorder Research

Timing of extinction relative to acquisition: a parametric analysis of fear extinction in humans

Open access
Norrholm, Seth D., Vervliet, Bram, Jovanovic, Tanja, Boshoven, William, Myers, Karyn M., Davis, Michael, Rothbaum, Barbara, Duncan, Erica J.·2008·Behavioral Neuroscience

Abstract

Fear extinction is a reduction in conditioned fear following repeated exposure to the feared cue in the absence of any aversive event. Extinguished fear often reappears after extinction through spontaneous recovery. Animal studies suggest that spontaneous recovery can be abolished if extinction occurs within minutes of acquisition. However, a limited number of human extinction studies have shown that short interval extinction does not prevent the return of fear. For this reason, we performed an in-depth parametric analysis of human fear extinction using fear-potentiated startle. Using separate single-cue and differential conditioning paradigms, participants were fear conditioned and then underwent extinction either 10 min (Immediate) or 72 hr (Delayed) later. Testing for spontaneous recovery occurred 96 hr after acquisition. In the single cue paradigm, the Immediate and Delayed groups exhibited differences in context, but not fear, conditioning. With differential conditioning, there were no differences in context conditioning and the Immediate group displayed less spontaneous recovery. Thus, the results remain inconclusive regarding spontaneous recovery and the timing of extinction and are discussed in terms of performing translational studies of fear in humans.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0012604

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Falls WA Davis M Friedman MJ Charney DS Deutch AY Behavioral and physiological analysis of fear inhibition Neurobiological and clinical consequences of stress: From normal adaptation to PTSD 1995 177 202 Lippincott-Raven Philadelphia
  2. Pavlov IP Conditioned reflexes 1927 Oxford University Press Oxford, England

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Norrholm, S. D., Vervliet, B., Jovanovic, T., Boshoven, W., Myers, K. M., Davis, M., Rothbaum, B., & Duncan, E. J.
Affiliations
  • Emory University (US)
  • University of Amsterdam (NL)
Venue
Behavioral Neuroscience
Published
2008
Volume
122
Issue
5
Pages
1016-1030
ISSN
  • 0735-7044 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-0084
OpenAlex
W2145929703
Cited by
120
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 11
FWCI
3.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Behavioral Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Atlanta VAMC
  • National Science Foundation (Agreement No. IBN-9876754)
  • American Psychiatric Association/GlaxoSmithKline
  • National Institute of Mental Health (1R24MH067314-01A1, 2P50 MH058922 and R37 MH47840)
  • Woodruff Foundation
  • Emory University School of Medicine
  • Yerkes National Primate Center
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
Keywords
fear extinction, spontaneous recovery, extinction time, fear potentiation, fear conditioning, differential conditioning, contextual conditioning, fear-potentiated startle
MeSH terms
Acoustic Stimulation, Adolescent, Adult, Analysis of Variance, Avoidance Learning, Conditioning, Classical, Cues, Extinction, Psychological, Fear, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Reaction Time, Reflex, Startle, Time Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review