Cited by 18Embodied and Extended CognitionPrimate Behavior and EcologyComplex Systems and Dynamics

Shrunken social brains? a minimal model of the role of social interaction in neural complexity.

Open access
Reséndiz-Benhumea, Georgina Montserrat, Sangati, Ekaterina, Sangati, Federico, Keshmiri, Soheil, Froese, Tom·2021·Frontiers in Neurorobotics

Abstract

The social brain hypothesis proposes that enlarged brains have evolved in response to the increasing cognitive demands that complex social life in larger groups places on primates and other mammals. However, this reasoning can be challenged by evidence that brain size has decreased in the evolutionary transitions from solitary to social larger groups in the case of Neolithic humans and some eusocial insects. Different hypotheses can be identified in the literature to explain this reduction in brain size. We evaluate some of them from the perspective of recent approaches to cognitive science, which support the idea that the basis of cognition can span over brain, body, and environment. Here we show through a minimal cognitive model using an evolutionary robotics methodology that the neural complexity, in terms of neural entropy and degrees of freedom of neural activity, of smaller-brained agents evolved in social interaction is comparable to the neural complexity of larger-brained agents evolved in solitary conditions. The nonlinear time series analysis of agents' neural activity reveals that the decoupled smaller neural network is intrinsically lower dimensional than the decoupled larger neural network. However, when smaller-brained agents are interacting, their actual neural complexity goes beyond its intrinsic limits achieving results comparable to those obtained by larger-brained solitary agents. This suggests that the smaller-brained agents are able to enhance their neural complexity through social interaction, thereby offsetting the reduced brain size.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fnbot.2021.634085

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Agents with relatively small brains can through social interaction achieve a level of behavioral performance comparable to larger-brained but solitary agents.

    “Using a multidisciplinary modeling approach, Reséndiz-Benhumea et al. (2021) indeed demonstrated that agents with relatively small brains can through social interaction achieve a level of behavioral performance comparable to those of larger-brained but solitary agents.”

    From When and Why Did Human Brains Decrease in Size? A New Change-Point Analysis and Insights From Brain Evolution in Ants (2021) · cites this paper as Reséndiz-Benhumea et al., 2021

    The Abstract and Discussion report that smaller-brained social agents achieved neural complexity comparable to larger-brained solitary agents. But Methods §2.1.3 defines performance as neural entropy, and the Discussion says the agents had no specific task to solve. The paper therefore does not demonstrate comparable behavioral performance. (LLM, conf=0.89)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Group-level cognition may select for reduced brain size and/or adaptive brain size variation.

    “Computational models (e.g., Feinerman and Traniello, 2016;Reséndiz-Benhumea et al., 2021) and patterns in some ant clades (Muscedere and Traniello, 2012;Riveros et al., 2012;Muratore et al., 2021) suggest that group-level cognition may select for reduced brain size and/or adaptive brain size variation.”

    From When and Why Did Human Brains Decrease in Size? A New Change-Point Analysis and Insights From Brain Evolution in Ants (2021) · cites this paper as Reséndiz-Benhumea et al., 2021

    The Discussion (page not available) reports that smaller-brained social agents achieved neural complexity comparable to larger-brained solitary agents, supporting the possibility that social interaction permits smaller brains. But it also says brain sizes were set in separate evolutionary runs, so the model did not test whether group-level cognition selects for reduced brain size or adaptive variation in brain size. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 50 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Reséndiz-Benhumea, G. M., Sangati, E., Sangati, F., Keshmiri, S., & Froese, T.
Affiliations
Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology Graduate University (JP)
Corresponding author
Reséndiz-Benhumea, Georgina Montserrat
Venue
Frontiers in Neurorobotics
Published
2021-06-11
Volume
15
Issue
634085
Pages
634085-634085
ISSN
1662-5218 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3165932997
Cited by
18
References
50
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3
FWCI
2.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Neurorobotics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Institutional Repositories DataBase (IRDB) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology Graduate University (Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology Graduate University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Greater South Information System
Funders
  • South Carolina Department of Agriculture
  • Consejo Nacional de Ciencia y Tecnología
  • Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology Graduate University
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Embodied and Extended Cognition
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Complex Systems and Dynamics
Keywords
social brain hypothesis, brain size reduction, social interaction, neural complexity, neural entropy, degrees of freedom, evolutionary robotics, eusocial insects, nonlinear time series analysis, brain-body-environment interaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review