Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 8

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Superstorm Sandy exposure in utero is associated with neurobehavioral phenotypes and brain structure alterations in childhood: A machine learning approach

Demirci, Gozde M., DeIngeniis, Donato, Wong, Wai Man, Shereen, A. Duke, Nomura, Yoko, Tsai, Chia-Ling·2023·Frontiers in Neuroscience

Abstract

Introduction: Prenatal maternal stress (PNMS), including exposure to natural disasters, has been shown to serve as a risk factor for future child psychopathology and suboptimal brain development, particularly among brain regions shown to be sensitive to stress and trauma exposure. However, statistical approaches deployed in most studies are usually constrained by a limited number of variables for the sake of statistical power. Explainable machine learning, on the other hand, enables the study of high data dimension and offers novel insights into the prominent subset of behavioral phenotypes and brain regions most susceptible to PNMS. In the present study, we aimed to identify the most important child neurobehavioral and brain features associated with in utero exposure to Superstorm Sandy (SS). Methods: By leveraging an explainable machine learning technique, the Shapley additive explanations method, we tested the marginal feature effect on SS exposures and examined the individual variable effects on disaster exposure. Results: Results show that certain brain regions are especially sensitive to in utero exposure to SS. Specifically, in utero SS exposure was associated with larger gray matter volume (GMV) in the right caudate, right hippocampus, and left amygdala and smaller GMV in the right parahippocampal gyrus. Additionally, higher aggression scores at age 5 distinctly correlated with SS exposure. Discussion: These findings suggest in utero SS exposure may be associated with greater aggression and suboptimal developmental alterations among various limbic and basal ganglia brain regions.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fnins.2023.1113927

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 39

  1. Acosta, 2019, Maternal pregnancy-related anxiety is associated with sexually dimorphic alterations in amygdala volume in 4-year-old children., Front. Behav. Neurosci., 13, 10.3389/fnbeh.2019.00175 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Bhatt, 2012, Distinct contributions of the amygdala and parahippocampal gyrus to suspicion in a repeated bargaining game., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 109, 8728, 10.1073/pnas.1200738109 · DOI
  3. Bi, 2019, What is machine learning? A primer for the epidemiologist., Am. J. Epidemiol., 188, 2222, 10.1093/aje/kwz189 · DOI
  4. Buss, 2010, High pregnancy anxiety during mid-gestation is associated with decreased gray matter density in 6–9-year-old children., Psychoneuroendocrinology, 35, 141, 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2009.07.010 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Buss, 2012, Maternal cortisol over the course of pregnancy and subsequent child amygdala and hippocampus volumes and affective problems., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 109, E1312, 10.1073/pnas.1201295109 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Cao-Lei, 2021, Prenatal maternal stress from a natural disaster and hippocampal volumes: Gene-by-environment interactions in young adolescents from project ice storm., Front. Behav. Neurosci., 15, 10.3389/fnbeh.2021.706660 · DOI
  7. Clemens, 2020, Report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change: Implications for the mental health policy of children and adolescents in Europe—a scoping review., Eur. Child Adolesc. Psychiatry, 31, 701, 10.1007/s00787-020-01615-3 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Chawla, 2002, SMOTE: Synthetic minority over-sampling technique., J. Artif. Intel. Res., 16, 321
  9. Crippa, 2015, Use of machine learning to identify children with autism and their motor abnormalities., J. Autism Dev. Disord., 45, 2146, 10.1007/s10803-015-2379-8 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Dale, 1999, Cortical surface-based analysis: I. Segmentation and surface reconstruction., Neuroimage, 9, 179, 10.1006/nimg.1998.0395 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Davis, 2017, Prenatal maternal cortisol concentrations predict neurodevelopment in middle childhood., Psychoneuroendocrinology, 75, 56, 10.1016/j.psyneuen.2016.10.005 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Dessie, 2021, A novel miRNA-based classification model of risks and stages for clear cell renal cell carcinoma patients., BMC Bioinformatics, 22, 10.1186/s12859-021-04189-2 · DOI
  13. Driscoll, 2022, Neuroanatomy, nucleus caudate, StatPearls.
  14. Elreedy, 2019, A comprehensive analysis of synthetic minority oversampling technique (SMOTE) for handling class imbalance., Inform. Sci., 505, 32, 10.1016/j.ins.2019.07.070 · DOI
  15. Finik, 2017, Cohort profile: Stress in pregnancy (SIP) study., Int. J. Epidemiol., 46, 1388, 10.1093/ije/dyw264 · DOI
  16. Glover, 2011, Annual research review: Prenatal stress and the origins of psychopathology: An evolutionary perspective., J. Child Psychol. Psychiatry, 52, 356, 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2011.02371.x · DOI · Paper page
  17. Güven, 2020, Combining functional near-infrared spectroscopy and EEG measurements for the diagnosis of attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder., Neural Comput. Appl., 32, 8367, 10.1007/s00521-019-04294-7 · DOI
  18. Jones, 2019, Larger amygdala volume mediates the association between prenatal maternal stress and higher levels of externalizing behaviors: Sex specific effects in project ice storm., Front. Hum. Neurosci., 13, 10.3389/fnhum.2019.00144 · DOI · Paper page
  19. King, 2012, Using natural disasters to study the effects of prenatal maternal stress on child health and development., Birth Defects Res. Part C Embryo Today Rev., 96, 273, 10.1002/bdrc.21026 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Lafortune, 2021, Effect of natural disaster-related prenatal maternal stress on child development and health: A meta-analytic review., Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 18, 10.3390/ijerph18168332 · DOI
  21. Lautarescu, 2020, Prenatal stress: Effects on fetal and child brain development., Int. Rev. Neurobiol., 150, 17, 10.1016/bs.irn.2019.11.002 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Little, 2020, Multivariate models of brain volume for identification of children and adolescents with fetal alcohol spectrum disorder., Hum. Brain Mapp., 41, 1181, 10.1002/hbm.24867 · DOI
  23. Loomans, 2013, Psychosocial stress during pregnancy is related to adverse birth outcomes: Results from a large multi-ethnic community-based birth cohort., Eur. J. Public Health, 23, 485, 10.1093/eurpub/cks097 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Mareckova, 2022, Prenatal stress and its association with amygdala-related structural covariance patterns in youth., NeuroImage Clin., 34, 10.1016/j.nicl.2022.102976 · DOI
  25. Nomura, 2022, Stress in pregnancy: Clinical and adaptive behavior of offspring following Superstorm Sandy., Dev. Psychopathol., 34, 1249, 10.1017/S0954579421000304 · DOI
  26. Oskar, 2020, Machine learning within studies of early-life environmental exposures and child health: Review of the current literature and discussion of next steps., Curr. Environ. Health Rep., 7, 170, 10.1007/s40572-020-00282-5 · DOI
  27. Park, 2021, Deep learning feature extraction approach for hematopoietic cancer subtype classification., Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 18, 10.3390/ijerph18042197 · DOI
  28. Reynolds, 2010, Behavior assessment system for children, Corsini. Encycl. Psychol., 1
  29. Reynolds, 2004, BASC-2: Behavior assessment system for children, 121
  30. Ring, 2002, Neuropsychiatry of the basal ganglia., J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry, 72, 12, 10.1136/jnnp.72.1.12 · DOI
  31. Rodriguez, 2021, Detection of prenatal alcohol exposure using machine learning classification of resting-state functional network connectivity data., Alcohol, 93, 25, 10.1016/j.alcohol.2021.03.001 · DOI
  32. Sartori, 2018, Volumetric brain magnetic resonance imaging predicts functioning in bipolar disorder: A machine learning approach., J. Psychiatr. Res., 103, 237, 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2018.05.023 · DOI
  33. Saxe, 2017, Machine learning methods to predict child posttraumatic stress: A proof-of-concept study., BMC Psychiatry, 17, 10.1186/s12888-017-1384-1 · DOI
  34. Thijssen, 2015, Brain morphology of childhood aggressive behavior: A multi-informant study in school-age children., Cogn. Affect. Behav. Neurosci., 15, 564, 10.3758/s13415-015-0344-9 · DOI
  35. Tisdall, 2012, Volumetric navigators for prospective motion correction and selective reacquisition in neuroanatomical MRI., Magn. Reson. Med., 68, 389, 10.1002/mrm.23228 · DOI
  36. Van den Bergh, 2020, Prenatal developmental origins of behavior and mental health: The influence of maternal stress in pregnancy., Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev., 117, 26, 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2017.07.003 · DOI · Paper page
  37. Watts, 2021, Predicting offenses among individuals with psychiatric disorders-A machine learning approach., J. Psychiatr. Res., 138, 146, 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2021.03.026 · DOI
  38. Zakrison, 2020, The medical, public health, and emergency response to the impact of 2017 hurricane Irma in Cuba., Disaster Med. Public Health Prep., 14, 10, 10.1017/dmp.2019.71 · DOI
  39. Zhu, 2019, Emotion regulation of hippocampus using real-time fMRI neurofeedback in healthy human., Front. Hum. Neurosci., 13, 10.3389/fnhum.2019.00242 · DOI

Cited by

See all 8

Metadata

Authors
Demirci, G. M., DeIngeniis, D., Wong, W. M., Shereen, A. D., Nomura, Y., & Tsai, C.-L.
Venue
Frontiers in Neuroscience
Published
2023-02-02
Volume
17
ISSN
1662-453X
Cited by
8
References
8

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.