Cited by 0Nutritional Studies and DietLipoproteins and Cardiovascular HealthNutrition, Genetics, and Disease

Beyond adherence: refractory dyslipidaemia, the mediterranean diet, and the case for personalized diet-drug complementarity

Open access
Skrabic, Roko, Kumric, Marko, Santic, Roko, Skrabic, Ivna, Pavlovic, Nikola, Rusic, Doris, Bozic, Josko·2026·Frontiers in Nutrition

Abstract

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) remains the leading cause of death worldwide, and atherogenic dyslipidaemia is one of its most modifiable drivers. The Mediterranean diet (MedDiet) is among the most extensively studied and best-supported dietary patterns for cardiovascular protection, yet meta-analyses show only modest and heterogeneous effects on the conventional lipid panel: typically 5%−15% reductions in LDL cholesterol, 10%−20% reductions in triglycerides and 3%−6% increases in HDL cholesterol, with very high between-study heterogeneity ( I 2 often >90%). Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is genetically determined and largely diet-resistant. Rather than re-asking whether the MedDiet “works”, this narrative review addresses a clinically more useful question: who are the lipid non-responders to a well-adhered MedDiet, and how should the diet be combined with contemporary lipid-lowering pharmacotherapy to close the residual-risk gap? Drawing on PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science (January 2015–April 2026) and seminal earlier trials, we synthesize five themes: genetic and metabolic non-responder phenotypes; the gut microbiota–metabolome axis; inflammaging; MedDiet on top of statin and non-statin therapy; and the obligatory partnership of physical activity, weight loss and smoking cessation. The MedDiet should be reframed not as an alternative to lipid-lowering drugs but as a foundational lifestyle component, personalized by genotype, inflammatory status, microbiota composition and treatment goals.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fnut.2026.1875074

Cites

101 of 101 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Still being checked.

Authors
Skrabic, R., Kumric, M., Santic, R., Skrabic, I., Pavlovic, N., Rusic, D., & Bozic, J.
Affiliations
  • Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Nephrology and Dialysis, University Hospital of Split
  • Department of Pathophysiology, University of Split School of Medicine
  • Klinički Bolnički Centar Split (HR)
  • Department of Pharmacy, University of Split School of Medicine
Venue
Frontiers in Nutrition
Published
2026-06-22
Volume
13
Pages
1875074-1875074
ISSN
2296-861X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W7165572965
Cited by
0
References
101
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Nutrition (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Lipoproteins and Cardiovascular Health
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Nutrition, Genetics, and Disease
Keywords
Mediterranean diet, atherogenic dyslipidemia, personalized nutrition, statins, lipoprotein(a), gut microbiota, metabolome, inflammaging, residual cardiovascular risk, physical activity, weight loss, smoking cessation, cardiovascular disease prevention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review