Cited by 34Hemodynamic Monitoring and TherapySepsis Diagnosis and TreatmentCongenital Heart Disease Studies

Advanced Hemodynamic Monitoring in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit

Open access
de Boode, Willem-Pieter·2020·Clinics in Perinatology

Abstract

Clinical assessment of cardiac output by interpretation of indirect parameters has proven to be inaccurate, irrespective of the level of experience of the clinician. Objective cardiac output monitoring is feasible in newborn infants in intensive care. The most promising methods include transthoracic echocardiography, transcutaneous Doppler, electrical biosensing technologies, transpulmonary ultrasound dilution, and arterial pulse contour analysis. Simultaneous assessment of blood pressure and cardiac output enables the identification of the earliest stage of shock. Comprehensive hemodynamic monitoring is pivotal for an individualized pathophysiology-based hemodynamic management.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.clp.2020.05.001

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Echocardiography shows a precision error of around 30% when compared to gold standard dilution techniques, which falls within the clinically accepted range.

    “For instance, echocardiography shows a precision error of around 30% when compared to gold standard dilution techniques, which falls within the clinically accepted range [54,55].”

    From Trends and Challenges in Noninvasive Hemodynamic Monitoring of Neonates Following Cardiac Surgery: A Narrative Review (2025) · cites this paper as [54]

    The Transthoracic Echocardiography section reports an error of around ±30% relative to more accurate reference methods, including dye dilution and thermodilution. It does not call that error clinically acceptable; instead, it describes echocardiography's precision as limited and cautions against using it as a reference method. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In neonates without shunting, echocardiographic measurement of cardiac output is generally reliable, with values ranging between 150 and 300 mL/kg/min.

    “In neonates without shunting, echocardiographic measurement of cardiac output is generally reliable, with values ranging between 150 and 300 mL/kg/min [53,54].”

    From Trends and Challenges in Noninvasive Hemodynamic Monitoring of Neonates Following Cardiac Surgery: A Narrative Review (2025) · cites this paper as [54]

    The 'What Is a Normal Level of Cardiac Output?' section gives 150–300 mL/kg/min as normal ventricular output in (pre)term infants without transductal or interatrial shunting. But the 'Transthoracic Echocardiography' section describes limited accuracy and precision, with error around ±30%, so it does not support calling echocardiographic measurement generally reliable. (LLM, conf=0.89)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • TCD has poor agreement to other cardiac output monitoring techniques, including TTE and thermodilution, with a bias ranging from 0% to 21% and an error margin between 43 and 65%.

    “It has poor agreement to other cardiac output monitoring techniques, including TTE and thermodilution, with a bias ranging from 0% to 21% and an error margin between 43 and 65%, respectively [54].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
de Boode, W.-P.
Venue
Clinics in Perinatology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-09
Volume
47
Issue
3
Pages
423-434
ISSN
0095-5108 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3026122157
Cited by
34
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 1
FWCI
0.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinics in Perinatology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Transonic Systems Inc
  • Pulsion Medical Systems
  • Osypka Medical
  • Cheetah Medical Inc
  • NI Medical
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Congenital Heart Disease Studies
Keywords
hemodynamic monitoring, cardiac output, neonatal intensive care, neonates, transthoracic echocardiography, electrical biosensing, arterial pulse contour analysis, shock detection, blood pressure, hemodynamic management
MeSH terms
Hemodynamic Monitoring, Blood Flow Velocity, Blood Gas Analysis, Blood Pressure, Blood Pressure Determination, Cardiac Output, Echocardiography, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Intensive Care Units, Neonatal, Reference Values, Shock, Biosensing Techniques, Critical Illness, Ultrasonography, Doppler, Pulse Wave Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review