The DOI matches its Crossref record; 33 of the 33 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Genome Edited Crops Touch the Market: A View on the Global Development and Regulatory Environment
Open accessAbstract
Products of genome editing as the most promising "New Plant Breeding Technology" (NPBT) have made the transition from the lab to the market in a short time. Globally, research activities employing genome editing are constantly expanding and more and more plants with market-oriented traits are being developed, and companies have already released the first genome edited crops to the market. Few countries, most of which are located in the Americas, have adapted legislations to these technologies or released guidelines supporting the use of genome editing. Other countries are debating the path to come either because there is no clarity on the legal classification or due consensus is hampered by a renewed GMO debate. In recent years (2017-2020), eight countries have introduced guidelines clarifying the legal status of genome edited products and many of those are actively committed to international harmonization of their policies. In this publication we give an overview on the current and potentially future international regulatory environment and an update on plants derived by genome editing with market-oriented traits.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
CRISPR/Cas9 in Genome Editing and Beyond
Wang, H., La Russa, M., & Qi, L. S. (2016) · Annual Review of Biochemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev-biochem-060815-014607 · Cited by 1,110
Targeted base editing in rice and tomato using a CRISPR-Cas9 cytidine deaminase fusion
Shimatani, Z., Kashojiya, S., Takayama, M., Terada, R., Arazoe, T., Ishii, H., Teramura, H., Yamamoto, T., Komatsu, H., Miura, K., et al. (2017) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.3833 · Cited by 812
Tang, L., Mao, B., Li, Y., Lv, Q., Zhang, L., Chen, C., He, H., Wang, W., Zeng, X., Shao, Y., et al. (2017) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-017-14832-9 · Cited by 570
Expanded base editing in rice and wheat using a Cas9-adenosine deaminase fusion
Li, C., Zong, Y., Wang, Y., Jin, S., Zhang, D., Song, Q., Zhang, R., & Gao, C. (2018) · Genome Biology · doi:10.1186/s13059-018-1443-z · Cited by 497
Mutations in a subfamily of abscisic acid receptor genes promote rice growth and productivity
Miao, C., Xiao, L., Hua, K., Zou, C., Zhao, Y., Bressan, R. A., & Zhu, J.-K. (2018) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1804774115 · Cited by 420
An overview of the last 10 years of genetically engineered crop safety research
Nicolia, A., Manzo, A., Veronesi, F., & Rosellini, D. (2014) · Critical Reviews in Biotechnology · doi:10.3109/07388551.2013.823595 · Cited by 413 · cited 1×
“A generic risk caused by the technology itself has not been proven since more than 30 years of biosafety research (European Commission, 2010; Nicolia et al., 2014; Leopoldina DFG and Akademieunion, 2019).”
BackgroundGenome-Editing Technologies: Principles and Applications
Gaj, T., Sirk, S. J., Shui, S.-L., & Liu, J. (2016) · Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology · doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a023754 · Cited by 381
Generation of herbicide tolerance traits and a new selectable marker in wheat using base editing
Zhang, R., Liu, J., Chai, Z., Chen, S., Bai, Y., Zong, Y., Chen, K., Li, J., Jiang, L., & Gao, C. (2019) · Nature Plants · doi:10.1038/s41477-019-0405-0 · Cited by 334
CRISPR/Cas-Mediated Base Editing: Technical Considerations and Practical Applications
Molla, K. A., & Yang, Y. (2019) · Trends in Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.tibtech.2019.03.008 · Cited by 331
Mutagenesis as a Tool in Plant Genetics, Functional Genomics, and Breeding
Sikora, P., Chawade, A., Larsson, M., Olsson, J., & Olsson, O. (2011) · International Journal of Plant Genomics · doi:10.1155/2011/314829 · Cited by 265
Cited by
Advanced domestication: harnessing the precision of gene editing in crop breeding
Lyzenga, W. J., Pozniak, C. J., & Kagale, S. (2021) · Plant Biotechnology Journal · doi:10.1111/pbi.13576 · Cited by 85
Plant synthetic biology innovations for biofuels and bioproducts
Yang, Y., Chaffin, T. A., Ahkami, A. H., Blumwald, E., & Stewart, C. N. (2022) · Trends in Biotechnology · doi:10.1016/j.tibtech.2022.09.007 · Cited by 59
Tariq, A., Mushtaq, M., Yaqoob, H., Bhat, B. A., Zargar, S. M., Raza, A., Ali, S., Charagh, S., Mubarik, M. S., Zaman, Q. U., et al. (2023) · GM Crops & Food · doi:10.1080/21645698.2023.2219111 · Cited by 45
Sharma, K. K., Palakolanu, S. R., Bhattacharya, J., Shankhapal, A. R., & Bhatnagar-Mathur, P. (2022) · Frontiers in Genetics · doi:10.3389/fgene.2022.999207 · Cited by 24
New genetic modification techniques: challenges and prospects
Head, G., & Tzotzos, G. T. (2023) · Present Knowledge in Food Safety · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-819470-6.00017-2 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- Menz, J., Modrzejewski, D., Hartung, F., Wilhelm, R., & Sprink, T.
- Venue
- Frontiers in Plant Science
- Publisher
- Frontiers Media SA
- Published
- 2020-10-09
- Volume
- 11
- Pages
- 586027-586027
- ISSN
- 1664-462X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3092058421
- Cited by
- 268
- References
- 33
- FWCI
- 19.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Genome Edited Crops Touch the Market: A View on the Global Development and Regulatory Environment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3389/fpls.2020.586027
- The paper
- Menz, J., Modrzejewski, D., Hartung, F., Wilhelm, R., & Sprink, T. (2020). Genome Edited Crops Touch the Market: A View on the Global Development and Regulatory Environment. Frontiers in Plant Science. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.586027
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
