Cited by 161Multi-Agent Systems and NegotiationSimulation Techniques and ApplicationsPhilosophy and History of Science

On agent-based modeling and computational social science

Open access
Conte, Rosaria, Paolucci, Mario·2014·Frontiers in Psychology

Abstract

In the first part of the paper, the field of agent-based modeling (ABM) is discussed focusing on the role of generative theories, aiming at explaining phenomena by growing them. After a brief analysis of the major strengths of the field some crucial weaknesses are analyzed. In particular, the generative power of ABM is found to have been underexploited, as the pressure for simple recipes has prevailed and shadowed the application of rich cognitive models. In the second part of the paper, the renewal of interest for Computational Social Science (CSS) is focused upon, and several of its variants, such as deductive, generative, and complex CSS, are identified and described. In the concluding remarks, an interdisciplinary variant, which takes after ABM, reconciling it with the quantitative one, is proposed as a fundamental requirement for a new program of the CSS.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00668

Cites

80 of 80 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • ABMs are often criticized for failing to capture the full spectrum of human behaviors; conventional agents within ABMs do not use language, interpret social contexts, or engage in conversations with each other.

    “Yet ABMs are often criticized for failing to capture the full spectrum of human behaviors (38). For example, conventional agents within ABMs do not use language, interpret social contexts, or engage in conversations with each other (39).”

    From Can Generative AI improve social science? (2024) · cites this paper as [38]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 83 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Gilbert N. (ed.). (2010). Computational Social Science, Volume 1-4 of SAGE Benchmarks in Social Research Methods Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications Ltd.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Conte, R., & Paolucci, M.
Affiliations
National Research Council (IT)
Corresponding author
Paolucci, Mario
Venue
Frontiers in Psychology
Published
2014-07-14
Volume
5
Pages
668-668
ISSN
1664-1078 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3124521395
Cited by
160
References
83
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 20 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3
FWCI
9.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Frontiers in Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • European Commission (284709)
  • Programma Operativo Nazionale Ricerca e Competitività (2007-2013)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Simulation Techniques and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Philosophy and History of Science
Keywords
agent-based modeling, computational social science, generative theory, generative power, cognitive models, interdisciplinary research, quantitative social science

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review