Cited by 45Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety StudiesStudent Stress and CopingGrit, Self-Efficacy, and Motivation

Do peers matter? Resistance to peer influence as a mediator between self-esteem and procrastination among undergraduates.

Open access
Chen, Bin-Bin, Shi, Zeyi, Wang, Yan·2016·Frontiers in Psychology

Abstract

This study examined the relationship between self-esteem and procrastination and the mediating role of resistance to peer influence (RPI) on this relationship among undergraduates. One hundred and ninety-nine Chinese undergraduate students completed the measures of procrastination, RPI, and self-esteem. Structural Equation Modeling analyses indicated that self-esteem was negatively related to procrastination, and RPI acted as a mediator of this relationship. The results suggest that the peer may be a key to understanding procrastination among undergraduates. Implications for future research and limitations of the current study are discussed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01529

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Bukowski W. M. Velasquez A. M. Brendgen M. (2008). “Variation in patterns of peer influence: Considerations of self and other,” in Understanding Peer influence in Children and Adolescents, eds Prinstein M. J. Dodge K. A. (New York, NY: Guildford Press), 125– 140.
  2. Kirkpatrick L. A. Ellis B. J. (2001). “Evolutionary perspectives on self-evaluation and self-esteem,” in The Blackwell Handbook of Social Psychology: Interpersonal processes Vol. 2 eds Fletcher G. Clark M. (Oxford: Blackwell), 411– 436.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chen, B.-B., Shi, Z., & Wang, Y.
Affiliations
Fudan University (CN)
Corresponding author
Wang, Yan
Venue
Frontiers in Psychology
Published
2016-10-03
Volume
7
Pages
1529-1529
ISSN
1664-1078 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2526658529
Cited by
45
References
41
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 1
FWCI
5.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Frontiers in Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (31500901)
  • Fudan University
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Student Stress and Coping
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Grit, Self-Efficacy, and Motivation
Keywords
procrastination, self-esteem, resistance to peer influence, peer influence, mediation, undergraduate students, Chinese students

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review