Cited by 148Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsStress and Burnout ResearchWorkplace Health and Well-being

A Workplace Mindfulness Intervention May Be Associated With Improved Psychological Well-Being and Productivity. A Preliminary Field Study in a Company Setting

Open access
Kersemaekers, Wendy, Rupprecht, Silke, Wittmann, Marc, Tamdjidi, Chris, Falke, Pia, Donders, Rogier, Speckens, Anne, Kohls, Niko·2018·Frontiers in Psychology

Abstract

Background: Mindfulness trainings are increasingly offered in workplace environments in order to improve health and productivity. Whilst promising, there is limited research on the effectiveness of mindfulness interventions in workplace settings. Objective: To examine the feasibility and effectiveness of a Workplace Mindfulness Training (WMT) in terms of burnout, psychological well-being and organizational and team climate and performance. Methods: This is a preliminary field study in four companies. Self-report questionnaires were administered up to a month before, at start of, and right at the end of the WMT, resulting in a pre-intervention and an intervention period. There was no separate control group. A total of 425 participants completed the surveys on the different time points. Linear mixed model analyses were used to analyze the data. Results: When comparing the intervention period with the pre-intervention period, significantly greater improvements were found in measures of burnout (mean difference=0.3, p0.8), moderate for well-being, burnout and perceived stress (d=0.5 - 0.8), and ranged from low to moderate for organizational and team climate and personal performance (d=0.2 - 0.8). Conclusion: These preliminary data suggest that compared to the pre-intervention period, the intervention period was associated with greater reductions in burnout and perceived stress, improvements in mindfulness, well-being, and increases in team and organisational climate and personal performance. Due to design limitations, no conclusions can be drawn on the extent to which the WMT or non-specific factors such as time have contributed to the findings. Further studies, preferably using randomized controlled designs with longer follow up periods are needed to evaluate whether the associations found can be attributed to the WMT and whether these sustain after the training.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00195

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Mindfulness training anticipates burnout with less emotional exhaustion and more job satisfaction.

    “It further anticipates burnout [18,21] with less emotional exhaustion and more job satisfaction [22].”

    From The Effectiveness of a Four-Week Online Mindfulness Training Course on Individual Mindfulness Skills and Personal Perception of Stress in Company Employees Working from Home (2022) · cites this paper as [21]

    The Results (Burnout and Perceived Stress; page unavailable) report lower burnout during the workplace mindfulness intervention, and the Outcome Measures section says the burnout measure includes emotional exhaustion. The paper does not report a separate emotional-exhaustion result or clearly establish increased job satisfaction; its organizational-climate satisfaction measure is not the same thing. Its preliminary, uncontrolled design also cannot establish that the training prevents burnout. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kersemaekers, W., Rupprecht, S., Wittmann, M., Tamdjidi, C., Falke, P., Donders, R., Speckens, A., & Kohls, N.
Affiliations
  • Radboud University Medical Center (NL)
  • Institute for Frontier Areas of Psychology and Mental Health (DE)
  • Coburg University of Applied Sciences (DE)
Corresponding author
Kersemaekers, Wendy
Venue
Frontiers in Psychology
Published
2018-02-28
Volume
9
Pages
195-195
ISSN
1664-1078 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2793894592
Cited by
148
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 3
FWCI
15.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Open access LMU (Ludwid Maxmilian's Universitat Munchen) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Stress and Burnout Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Workplace Health and Well-being
Keywords
burnout, psychological well-being, perceived stress, organizational climate, team climate, employee performance, workplace interventions, employee health

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review