Cited by 20Memory Processes and InfluencesChild and Animal Learning DevelopmentCognitive Functions and Memory

Did the popsicle melt? Preschoolers’ performance in an episodic-like memory task

Open access
Martin-Ordas, Gema, Atance, Cristina M., Caza, Julian·2017·Memory

Abstract

Episodic memory has been tested in non-human animals using depletion paradigms that assess recollection for the "what", "where" and "when" (i.e., how long ago). This paradigm has not been used with human children, yet doing so would provide another means to explore their episodic memory development. Using a depletion paradigm, preschool-aged children were presented in two trials with a preferred food that was only edible after a short interval and a less-preferred food that was edible after the short and long intervals. Younger (mean = 40 months) and older (mean = 65 months) children tended to choose their preferred food after the short intervals, but did not switch to selecting their less-preferred food after the long intervals. Importantly, their choices did not differ with age. Although older children better remembered "what", "where", and "what is where" than did younger children, neither age group successfully estimated "how long ago" an event occurred. Finally, both age groups spontaneously recalled information about Trial 1. We also analysed the relation between the different measures used in the study but no clear patterns emerged. Results are discussed with respect to the cognitive mechanisms necessary to succeed in depletion paradigms and the measurement of episodic memory more broadly.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/09658211.2017.1285940

Cites

69 of 69 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Humans appear to use conscious episodic memory in episodic-like memory tasks in some instances, but in others they fail the tasks altogether.

    “However, although humans appear to use conscious episodic memory in episodic-like memory tasks in some instances [106], in others they fail the tasks altogether [107,108].”

    From Is episodic-like memory <i>like</i> episodic memory? (2024) · cites this paper as [108]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. C.Hoerl, & T. McCormack, (eds.) Time and memory: Issues in philosophy and psychology (pp. 285-314). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  2. Nelson, K., & Gruendel, J. (1986). Children's scripts. In K. Nelson (ed.), Event knowledge: structure and function in development (pp. 21-46). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  3. Schneider, W., & Bjorklund, D.F. (1998). Memory In R.S. Siegler, D. Kuhn, (eds.) Cognitive, language, and perceptual development, Damon, W. general editor, Handbook of child psychology (Vol. 2 pp. 467-521). New York: Wiley.
  4. Tulving, E. (1972). Organization of memory In E. Tulving, & W. Donaldson (eds). Organization of Memory (pp. 381-403). New York, Academic Press..

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Martin-Ordas, G., Atance, C. M., & Caza, J.
Affiliations
  • Centre for Behaviour and Evolution, Institute of Neuroscience, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
  • University of Ottawa (CA)
Venue
Memory
Published
2017-02-16
Volume
25
Issue
9
Pages
1260-1271
ISSN
  • 0965-8211 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-0686
OpenAlex
W2580374305
Cited by
20
References
66
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2
FWCI
1.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
public-domain
Locations
  • Memory (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Stirling Online Research Repository (University of Stirling) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
  • Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity)
Funders
  • Marie Sklodowska-Curie
  • Horizon 2020
  • Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Child and Animal Learning Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
Keywords
episodic memory, preschool children, memory development, recollection, temporal memory, age differences, food choice, spontaneous recall
MeSH terms
Child, Preschool, Choice Behavior, Female, Humans, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Time Perception, Memory, Episodic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review