Cited by 61Memory Processes and InfluencesMemory and Neural MechanismsCognitive Functions and Memory

Do humans use episodic memory to solve a What-Where-When memory task?

Holland, Stephen M., Smulders, Tom V.·2011·Animal Cognition

Abstract

What-Where-When (WWW) memory tasks have been used to study episodic(-like) memory in non-human animals. In this study, we investigate whether humans use episodic memory to solve such a WWW memory task. Participants are assigned to one of two treatments, in which they hide different coin types (what) in different locations (where) on two separate occasions (when). In the Active treatment, which mimics the animal situation as closely as possible, participants are instructed to memorize the WWW information; in the Passive treatment, participants are unaware of the fact that memory will be tested. In both groups, the majority of participants report using a mental time travel strategy to solve the task, and performance on a different episodic memory test significantly predicts performance on the WWW memory task. This suggests that the WWW memory task is a good test of episodic memory in humans. Participants remember locations and coins from the first hiding session better than they do those of the second hiding session, suggesting their memories may be reinforced during the second hiding session. We also investigated how well episodic memory performance predicted performance on the three aspects of the WWW memory task separately. In the Passive treatment, episodic memory performance predicts performance on all three aspects of the WWW memory task equally. However, in the Active treatment it only predicts performance on the what component. This could imply that during active encoding a different memory system is used for where and when information than during passive encoding. Encoding of what information seems to rely on episodic memory processing in both conditions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10071-010-0346-5

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Humans appear to use conscious episodic memory in episodic-like memory tasks in some instances, but in others they fail the tasks altogether.

    “However, although humans appear to use conscious episodic memory in episodic-like memory tasks in some instances [106], in others they fail the tasks altogether [107,108].”

    From Is episodic-like memory <i>like</i> episodic memory? (2024) · cites this paper as [106]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Holland, S. M., & Smulders, T. V.
Affiliations
Newcastle University (GB)
Corresponding author
Smulders, Tom V.
Venue
Animal Cognition
Published
2010-07-27
Volume
14
Issue
1
Pages
95-102
ISSN
  • 1435-9448 (ISSN-L)
  • 1435-9456
OpenAlex
W2127365048
Cited by
61
References
29
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 2
FWCI
2.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Animal Cognition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory and Neural Mechanisms
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
Keywords
episodic memory, mental time travel, memory encoding, memory retrieval, spatial memory, temporal memory
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Female, Humans, Male, Mental Processes, Problem Solving, Mental Recall, Task Performance and Analysis, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review