CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 44Embodied and Extended CognitionPsychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsAction Observation and Synchronization

Body influences on social cognition through interoception

Open access
Gao, Qiyang, Ping, Xianjie, Chen, Wei·2019·Frontiers in Psychology
DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02066PMC PMC6746904
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02066

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The role of PPS representation in social interactions may be more important than previously thought.

    “Keeping in mind that bodily signals may impact social cognition through interoception (Gao, Ping, & Chen, 2019) and that PPS representations contribute to bodily self-consciousness (Serino, 2019), the role of PPS representation in social interactions may be more important than previously thought.”

    From The Peripersonal Space in a social world (2021) · cites this paper as Gao, Ping, & Chen, 2019

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 36

  1. Ackerman J. M. Nocera C. C. Bargh J. A. (2010). Incidental haptic sensations influence social judgments and decisions. Science 328, 1712– 1715. 10.1126/science.1189993 20576894 PMC3005631 · DOI
  2. Ainley V. Tajadura-Jiménez A. Fotopoulou A. Tsakiris M. (2012). Looking into myself: changes in interoceptive sensitivity during mirror self-observation. Psychophysiology 49, 1504– 1508. 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2012.01468.x 22978299 PMC3755258 · DOI
  3. Bartz J. A. Zaki J. Bolger N. Hollander E. Ludwig N. N. Kolevzon A.. (2010). Oxytocin selectively improves empathic accuracy. Psychol. Sci. 21, 1426– 1428. 10.1177/0956797610383439 20855907 PMC6634294 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Bernhardt B. C. Singer T. (2012). The neural basis of empathy. Annu. Rev. Neurosci. 35, 1– 23. 10.1146/annurev-neuro-062111-150536 22715878 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Cascio C. J. Foss-Feig J. H. Burnette C. P. Heacock J. L. Cosby A. A. (2012). The rubber hand illusion in children with autism spectrum disorders: delayed influence of combined tactile and visual input on proprioception. Autism 16, 406– 419. 10.1177/1362361311430404 22399451 PMC3529180 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Chen W. Zhang J. Qian Y. Gao Q. (2017). How disentangled sense of agency and sense of ownership can interact with different emotional events on stress feelings. Psicol. Reflex. Crít. 30: 17 10.1186/s41155-017-0071-y PMC6974349 32026071 · DOI
  7. Cook S. W. Friedman H. S. Duggan K. A. Cui J. Popescu V. (2017). Hand gesture and mathematics learning: lessons from an Avatar. Cogn. Sci. 41, 518– 535. 10.1111/cogs.12344 27128822 · DOI
  8. Critchley H. D. Wiens S. Rotshtein P. Ohman A. Dolan R. J. (2004). Neural systems supporting interoceptive awareness. Nat. Neurosci. 7, 189– 195. 10.1038/nn1176 14730305 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Dunn B. D. Galton H. C. Morgan R. Evans D. Oliver C. Meyer M.. (2010). Listening to your heart: how interoception shapes emotion experience and intuitive decision making. Psychol. Sci. 21, 1835– 1844. 10.1177/0956797610389191 21106893 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Frick A. Mohring W. Newcombe N. S. (2014). Picturing perspectives: development of perspective-taking abilities in 4- to 8-year-olds. Front. Psychol. 5: 386. 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00386 24817860 PMC4012199 · DOI
  11. Fukushima H. Terasawa Y. Umeda S. (2011). Association between interoception and empathy: evidence from heartbeat-evoked brain potential. Int. J. Psychophysiol. 79, 259– 265. 10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2010.10.015 21055427 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Gallagher S. (2011). The Oxford Handbook of the Self. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  13. Goldman A. de Vignemont F. (2009). Is social cognition embodied? Trends Cogn. Sci. 13, 154– 159. 10.1016/j.tics.2009.01.007 19269881 · DOI
  14. Greenfield K. Ropar D. Smith A. D. Carey M. Newport R. (2015). Visuo-tactile integration in autism: atypical temporal binding may underlie greater reliance on proprioceptive information. Mol. Autism 6: 51. 10.1186/s13229-015-0045-9 26380064 PMC4570750 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Grynberg D. Pollatos O. (2015). Perceiving one's body shapes empathy. Physiol. Behav. 140, 54– 60. 10.1016/j.physbeh.2014.12.026 25497886 · DOI
  16. Häfner M. (2013). When body and mind are talking: interoception moderates embodied cognition. Exp. Psychol. 60, 255– 259. 10.1027/1618-3169/a000194 23548985 · DOI
  17. Happé F. Cook J. L. Bird G. (2017). The structure of social cognition: in (ter) dependence of sociocognitive processes. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 68, 243– 267. 10.1146/annurev-psych-010416-044046 27687121 · DOI
  18. Haswell C. C. Izawa J. Dowell L. R. Mostofsky S. H. Shadmehr R. (2009). Representation of internal models of action in the autistic brain. Nat. Neurosci. 12, 970– 972. 10.1038/nn.2356 19578379 PMC2740616 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Herbert B. M. Pollatos O. (2012). The body in the mind: on the relationship between interoception and embodiment. Top. Cogn. Sci. 4, 692– 704. 10.1111/j.1756-8765.2012.01189.x 22389201 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Izawa J. Pekny S. E. Marko M. K. Haswell C. C. Shadmehr R. Mostofsky S. H. (2012). Motor learning relies on integrated sensory inputs in ADHD, but over-selectively on proprioception in autism spectrum conditions. Autism Res. 5, 124– 136. 10.1002/aur.1222 22359275 PMC3329587 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Kilteni K. Groten R. Slater M. (2012). The sense of embodiment in virtual reality. Presence Teleop. Virt. 21, 373– 387. 10.1162/PRES_a_00124 · DOI
  22. Macedonia M. (2014). Bringing back the body into the mind: gestures enhance word learning in foreign language. Front. Psychol. 5: 1467. 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01467 25538671 PMC4260465 · DOI
  23. Ninan I. (2011). Oxytocin suppresses basal glutamatergic transmission but facilitates activity-dependent synaptic potentiation in the medial prefrontal cortex. J. Neurochem. 119, 324– 331. 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2011.07430.x 21848811 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Park M. Song J.-J. Oh S. J. Shin M.-S. Lee J. H. Oh S. H. (2015). The relation between nonverbal IQ and postoperative CI outcomes in cochlear implant users: preliminary result. Biomed Res. Int. 2015, 1– 7. 10.1155/2015/313274 26236723 PMC4506840 · DOI
  25. Pollatos O. Herbert B. M. Berberich G. Zaudig M. Krauseneck T. Tsakiris M. (2016). Atypical self-focus effect on interoceptive accuracy in anorexia nervosa. Front. Hum. Neurosci. 10: 484. 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00484 27729855 PMC5037175 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Premack D. Woodruff G. (1978). Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind? Behav. Brain Sci. 1, 515– 526. 10.1017/S0140525X00076512 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Quattrocki E. Friston K. (2014). Autism, oxytocin and interoception. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 47, 410– 430. 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.09.012 25277283 PMC4726659 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Ronchi R. Bello-Ruiz J. Lukowska M. Herbelin B. Cabrilo I. Schaller K.. (2015). Right insular damage decreases heartbeat awareness and alters cardio-visual effects on bodily self-consciousness. Neuropsychologia 70, 11– 20. 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.02.010 25676677 · DOI
  29. Schauder K. B. Mash L. E. Bryant L. K. Cascio C. J. (2015). Interoceptive ability and body awareness in autism spectrum disorder. J. Exp. Child Psychol. 131, 193– 200. 10.1016/j.jecp.2014.11.002 25498876 PMC4303499 · DOI · Paper page
  30. Schmidsberger F. Löffler-Stastka H. (2018). Empathy is proprioceptive: the bodily fundament of empathy-a philosophical contribution to medical education. BMC Med. Educ. 18: 69. 10.1186/s12909-018-1161-y 29622015 PMC5887217 · DOI
  31. Sedeño L. Couto B. Melloni M. Canales-Johnson A. Yoris A. Baez S.. (2014). How do you feel when you can't feel your body? Interoception, functional connectivity and emotional processing in depersonalization-derealization disorder. PLoS ONE 9: e98769. 10.1371/journal.pone.0098769 24967634 PMC4072534 · DOI
  32. Shah P. Catmur C. Bird G. (2017). From heart to mind: linking interoception, emotion, and theory of mind. Cortex 93, 220– 223. 10.1016/j.cortex.2017.02.010 28476292 PMC5542037 · DOI · Paper page
  33. Sherrington C. S. (1906). The Integrative Action of the Nervous System. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  34. Terasawa Y. Moriguchi Y. Tochizawa S. Umeda S. (2014). Interoceptive sensitivity predicts sensitivity to the emotions of others. Cogn. Emot. 28, 1435– 1448. 10.1080/02699931.2014.888988 24559130 · DOI · Paper page
  35. Tsakiris M. (2017). The multisensory basis of the self: from body to identity to others. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. 70, 597– 609. 10.1080/17470218.2016.1181768 27100132 PMC5214748 · DOI
  36. Tsakiris M. Hesse M. D. Boy C. Haggard P. Fink G. R. (2006). Neural signatures of body ownership: a sensory network for bodily self-consciousness. Cereb. Cortex 17, 2235– 2244. 10.1093/cercor/bhl131 17138596 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

  • The Peripersonal Space in a social world

    Bogdanova, O. V., Bogdanov, V. B., Dureux, A., Farnè, A., & Hadj-Bouziane, F. (2021) · Cortex · doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2021.05.005 · Cited by 86 · see citing works

    “Keeping in mind that bodily signals may impact social cognition through interoception (Gao et al., 2019) and that PPS representations contribute to bodily self-consciousness (Serino, 2019), the role of PPS Jo ur al Pr e-p roo f”
    Background

Authors
Gao, Q., Ping, X., & Chen, W.
Affiliations
Shaoxing University (CN)
Corresponding author
Chen, Wei
ORCID
Gao, Qiyang
Venue
Frontiers in Psychology
Publisher
Frontiers Media SA
Published
2019-09-10
Volume
10
Pages
2066-2066
ISSN
1664-1078 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02066
PMC
PMC6746904
OpenAlex
W2970012241
Cited by
44
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 3
FWCI
2.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Frontiers in Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China
  • National Social Science Fund of China (16CZX015)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Embodied and Extended Cognition
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Action Observation and Synchronization
Keywords
interoception, social cognition, body, embodiment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review