Cited by 22Environmental Sustainability in BusinessEnvironmental Education and SustainabilityDecision-Making and Behavioral Economics

Good News or Bad News? How Message Framing Influences Consumers’ Willingness to Buy Green Products

Open access
Tong, Zelin, Liu, Diyi, Ma, Fang, Xu, Xiaobing·2021·Frontiers in Psychology

Abstract

Despite the growing social interest in green products, companies often find it difficult to find effective strategies to induce consumers to purchase green products or engage in other environmentally friendly behaviors. To address this situation, we examined the favorable or unfavorable effects of positive and negative message frames on consumers’ willingness to consume green products in different psychological distance contexts. Through two Studies, we found that the positive information framework played a more pronounced role in context when consumers were in closer spatial distances. More importantly, we found that the emotional factors of fear and hope were intrinsic causes of this phenomenon. Correspondingly, the negative information framework played a better facilitating role in context with farther spatial distance, while shame and pride were the emotions responsible for this effect. Finally, we discuss the theoretical and managerial implications of our work, as well as its limitations and future research directions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.568586

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Health consciousness positively impacts moral norms regarding healthy eating.

    “Multiple studies have demonstrated that health consciousness significantly influences the development of moral norms regarding food choices, as consumers categorize foods not just by their health benefits, but through an ethical lens of “good” versus “bad” choices [49,82].”

    From Psychological Determinants of Healthy Food Purchase Intention: An Integrative Model Based on Health Consciousness (2025) · cites this paper as [82]

    Theoretical Background and Assumptions discusses emotions and environmentally friendly purchases, not health consciousness or moral norms about healthy eating. Searches for those concepts and for ethical classifications of food found no passage in our copy that addresses the claimed relationship; the References section lists a study of virtue and vice foods, but does not report this finding. No page numbers are available in the indexed passages. (LLM, conf=0.73)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 53 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Dale A. (2008). Enterprise: green products gain from new price equation; they fifind new buyers as high energy costs hurt regular brands. Wall Street Journal Eastern Edition 251 B7

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tong, Z., Liu, D., Ma, F., & Xu, X.
Affiliations
Hainan University (CN)
Corresponding author
Xu, Xiaobing
Venue
Frontiers in Psychology
Published
2021-01-19
Volume
11
Pages
568586-568586
ISSN
1664-1078 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3125661010
Cited by
22
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 6
FWCI
3.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (71772003, 71962007, 71872184)
  • Hainan University (kyqd[sk]1919)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Environmental Sustainability in Business
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Environmental Education and Sustainability
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
Keywords
message framing, green products, purchase intention, psychological distance, positive framing, negative framing, fear, hope, shame, pride, consumer behavior, environmental behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review