Cited by 35Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsWorkaholism, burnout, and well-beingJob Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior

Psychological Flexibility and Its Relationship to Distress and Work Engagement Among Intensive Care Medical Staff

Open access
Holmberg, Johan, Kemani, Mike K., Holmström, Linda, Öst, Lars-Göran, Wicksell, Rikard K.·2020·Frontiers in Psychology

Abstract

Intensive care settings place specific work-related demands on health care professionals that may elicit stress and negatively influence occupational health and work engagement. Psychological flexibility has emerged as a promising construct that could help explain variation in reported health. Understanding the role of psychological flexibility in occupational psychological health among intensive care medical staff may potentially guide the development of effective interventions. Thus, the present study evaluated the relationships between psychological flexibility (Work-related Acceptance and Action Questionnaire), distress (Perceived Stress Scale, General Health Questionnaire) and work engagement (Utrecht Work Engagement Scale) in a sample of 144 health care professionals from one adult (ICU, N=98) and one pediatric (PICU, N=46) intensive care unit. In addition to cross-sectional analyses, a subset of data (PICU, N=46) was analyzed using a longitudinal design. Results illustrated that higher levels of distress were associated with lower levels of work engagement. Furthermore, psychological flexibility was related to greater work engagement, and psychological flexibility had a significant indirect effect on the relationship between distress and work engagement. Lastly, increased psychological flexibility over time corresponded with increased work engagement. Although tentative, the results suggest the importance of psychological flexibility for work engagement in health care professionals within intensive care settings.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.603986

Cites

67 of 67 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The pattern of PII and PIPS improving significantly over time during ACT while pain intensity did not is in line with previous studies on treatment effects published by our group.

    “The pattern found, of PII and PIPS improving significantly over time during ACT while pain intensity did not, is in line with the previous studies on treatment effects published by our group [12,13,31,39,40,41,42].”

    From Baseline Pro-Inflammatory Cytokine Levels Moderate Psychological Inflexibility in Behavioral Treatment for Chronic Pain (2022) · cites this paper as [41]

    The Methods (Design; page not provided) describe a cross-sectional study of intensive care staff with a longitudinal subsample, not an ACT treatment study. The Results (Changes in Psychological Flexibility, Distress, and Work Engagement Over Time; page not provided) report work engagement, stress, and work-related psychological flexibility. A search for PII, PIPS, pain intensity, and ACT treatment effects found no passage reporting the claimed pattern. (LLM, conf=0.77)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Hayes S. C. Strosahl K. Wilson K. G. (1999). Acceptance and commitment therapy: An experiential approach to behavioral change. New York: Guilford Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Holmberg, J., Kemani, M. K., Holmström, L., Öst, L.-G., & Wicksell, R. K.
Affiliations
  • Karolinska Institutet (SE)
  • Stockholm University (SE)
Corresponding author
Holmberg, Johan
Venue
Frontiers in Psychology
Published
2020-11-04
Volume
11
Pages
603986-603986
ISSN
1664-1078 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3096645002
Cited by
34
References
66
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4
FWCI
1.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Kommunfullmäktige, Stockholms Stad
  • Karolinska Institutet
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Workaholism, burnout, and well-being
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
Keywords
psychological flexibility, work engagement, occupational distress, intensive care unit, pediatric intensive care unit, healthcare workers, Acceptance and Action Questionnaire, General Health Questionnaire, Perceived Stress Scale, mediation, longitudinal change

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review