Cited by 127Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsPsychological Well-being and Life SatisfactionWorkplace Health and Well-being

Effects of Self-Compassion Training on Work-Related Well-Being: A Systematic Review

Open access
Kotera, Yasuhiro, Van Gordon, William·2021·Frontiers in Psychology

Abstract

Self-compassion, sharing some commonalities with positive psychology 2.0 approaches, is associated with better mental health outcomes in diverse populations, including workers. Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, there is heightened awareness of the importance of self-care for fostering mental health at work. However, evidence regarding the applications of self-compassion interventions in work-related contexts has not been systematically reviewed to date. Therefore, this systematic review aimed to synthesize and evaluate the utility of self-compassion interventions targeting work-related well-being, as well as assess the methodological quality of relevant studies. Eligible articles were identified from research databases including ProQuest, PsycINFO, Science Direct, and Google Scholar. The quality of non-randomized trials and randomized controlled trials was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and the Quality Assessment Table, respectively. The literature search yielded 3,387 titles from which ten studies met the inclusion criteria. All ten studies reported promising effects of self-compassion training for work-related well-being. The methodological quality of these studies was medium. All ten studies recruited workers in a caring field and were mostly conducted in Western countries. The Self-Compassion Scale or its short-form was used in almost all instances. Findings indicate that self-compassion training can improve self-compassion and other work-related well-being outcomes in working populations. However, in general, there is need for greater methodological quality in work-related self-compassion intervention studies to advance understanding regarding the applications and limitations of this technique in work contexts. Furthermore, future studies should focus on a broader range of employee groups, including non-caring professions as well as individuals working in non-Western countries.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.630798

Cites

84 of 85 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Adherence difficulties are a common aspect in MBIs.

    “This is a common aspect in MBIs [58]”

    From Pilot study of an online brief mindfulness-based intervention to improve the well-being of managers and reduce their stress at work. (2024) · cites this paper as [58]

    The Results > Risk of Bias section (page unavailable) reports that fewer than 80% of participants in one trial completed its final assessment. Searches for adherence, engagement, dropout, and mindfulness-based interventions found no passage saying that adherence difficulties are common in MBIs; the reported trial attrition does not establish that broader claim. (LLM, conf=0.74)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Hacker T. (2008). The relational compassion scale: development and validation of a new self rated scale for the assessment of self-other compassion. Doctoral dissertation, University of Glasgow, Glasgow. Retrieved from https://eleanor.lib.gla.ac.uk/record=b2702336
  2. Hoofstede G. Hofstede G. J. Minkov M. (2010). Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind (3rd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Education.
  3. Wong P. T. P. (2020b). Made for Resilience and Happiness: Effective Coping With COVID-19 According to Viktor E. Frankl and Paul T. P. Wong. Toronto, Ontario: INPM Press.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kotera, Y., & Van Gordon, W.
Affiliations
University of Derby (GB)
Corresponding author
Kotera, Yasuhiro
Venue
Frontiers in Psychology
Published
2021-04-23
Volume
12
Pages
630798-630798
ISSN
1664-1078 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3159166417
Cited by
127
References
84
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 30 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 4
FWCI
2.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Derby Online Research Archive. (University of Derby) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Workplace Health and Well-being
Keywords
self-compassion training, work-related well-being, employee mental health, self-compassion interventions, positive psychology interventions, caring professions, Self-Compassion Scale

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review