Cited by 69Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsPsychometric Methodologies and TestingPsychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction

Revisiting the Self-compassion Scale-Short Form: Stronger Associations with Self-inadequacy and Resilience

Open access
Kotera, Yasuhiro, Sheffield, David·2020·SN Comprehensive Clinical Medicine

Abstract

The Self-compassion Scale-Short Form (SCS-SF) was developed as an economical alternative for the Self-compassion Scale (SCS), one of the few scales to assess self-compassion. Despite the active use of the SCS-SF, a psychometric evaluation of this scale remains limited. This study analysed the factor structure, reliability, and construct validity of the SCS-SF in UK university student populations. Of 365 students approached, 333 completed the SCS-SF and other measures including negative psychological constructs (mental health problems, self-criticism, and mental health shame) and positive psychological constructs (self-reassurance, resilience, and well-being). Data were analysed through confirmatory factor analyses and correlations. CFA revealed that the six-factor structure, reported in the validation paper, was not replicated. The positive factor, consisting of the three positive subscales, was not strongly related to any variable but moderately related to reassured-self, resilience, well-being, and inadequate-self. The negative factor, consisting of the three negative subscales, was strongly related to inadequate-self and moderately related to resilience, reassured-self, stress, well-being, depression, and internal shame. Coefficients in the negative factor were in general larger than those in the positive factor. The total SCS-SF score was most strongly related to inadequate-self, followed by resilience. Inter-correlations of the six subscales did follow neither Neff’s [1] theoretical model of self-compassion nor the full-scale factor solution. Findings do not accord with the common use of the global SCS-SF score as an assessment of six factors of self-compassion and suggest a two-factor solution assessing self-criticism and self-compassion.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s42399-020-00309-w

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Some adaptations found a two-factor structure instead of one factor, in a clinical population and among students.

    “pojawiły się również adaptacje, wktórych zamiast jednego czynnika wyłoniono strukturę dwuczynnikową (w populacji klinicznej [33] iwśród studentów [34]).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Stewart-Brown S, Janmohamed K. Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale (WEMWBS) user guide version 1. Warwick: Warwick Medical School; 2008.
  2. RStudio Team. RStudio: integrated development for R. Boston: RStudio, Inc.; 2015.
  3. Nunnally JC. Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1978.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kotera, Y., & Sheffield, D.
Affiliations
University of Derby (GB)
Corresponding author
Kotera, Yasuhiro
Venue
SN Comprehensive Clinical Medicine
Published
2020-05-24
Volume
2
Issue
6
Pages
761-769
ISSN
2523-8973 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3027431992
Cited by
68
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 1
FWCI
3.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • SN Comprehensive Clinical Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • University of Derby Online Research Archive. (University of Derby) (submittedVersion)
Funders
University of Derby
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction
Keywords
Self-Compassion Scale Short Form, self-compassion, factor structure, construct validity, reliability statistics, resilience, self-criticism, internalized shame, university students, two-factor model

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review