Cited by 621Visual perception and processing mechanismsFace Recognition and PerceptionTactile and Sensory Interactions

Lives without imagery – Congenital aphantasia

Open access
Zeman, Adam, Dewar, Michaela, Della Sala, Sergio·2015·Cortex

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cortex.2015.05.019

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zeman, A., Dewar, M., & Della Sala, S.
Affiliations
  • University of Exeter (GB)
  • Heriot-Watt University (GB)
Corresponding author
Zeman, Adam
Venue
Cortex
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-12
Volume
73
Pages
378-380
ISSN
0010-9452 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2211964365
Cited by
621
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 116 · 2025: 79 · 2024: 80 · 2023: 101 · 2022: 49 · 2021: 54 · 2020: 58 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 3
FWCI
11.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cortex (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion)
  • Open Research Exeter (University of Exeter) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
Keywords
mental imagery, visual imagery
MeSH terms
Humans, Imagination, Surveys and Questionnaires, Task Performance and Analysis, Imagery, Psychotherapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review