Cited by 33Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsSchizophrenia research and treatmentPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

The Role of Five Facets of Mindfulness in a Mindfulness-Based Psychoeducation Intervention for People With Recent-Onset Psychosis on Mental and Psychosocial Health Outcomes

Open access
Chien, Wai Tong, Chow, Ka Ming, Chong, Yuen Yu, Bressington, Daniel, Choi, Kai Chow, Chan, Carmen Wing Han·2020·Frontiers in Psychiatry

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to examine how five facets of mindfulness may be associated with the changes in psychotic patients’ health outcomes after participating in a mindfulness-based psychoeducation group (MBPEG) program. Methods: Longitudinal follow-up data from two pragmatic randomized controlled trials of MBPEG for psychotic patients were used for this study. A total of 124 patients who completed the MBPEG program were included in this analysis. Patient outcomes (psychotic symptoms, functioning, insight into illness/treatment, subjective recovery) and five facets of mindfulness were assessed at baseline and six, 12 and 24 months post-intervention. Areas under the curve of individual outcomes in repeated-measures were computed using trapezoidal method, rescaled to the original possible range of the underlying variable and used for correlation and regression analyses. Results: All mean scores of the five facets increased across time and were significantly correlated with the improvements in all patient outcomes (p values ranged from <.001 to <.05), except ‘non-judging’ facet and symptom severity. Regression analyses revealed that only ‘observing’ and ‘acting with awareness’ were significantly associated with positive changes across all outcomes (increase in adjusted R2 ranged from 5.9% to 24.2%, p values <.001). Conclusions: Two facets of mindfulness, ‘observing’ and ‘acting with awareness’, were related to positive outcomes of psychotic patients after participating in the MBPEG. More efforts in addressing these two facets of mindfulness can be considered to increase the efficacy of mindfulness-based interventions in psychosis.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00177

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A 2-year longitudinal follow-up study revealed that all facets of mindfulness significantly increased over time and that two facets (observing and acting with awareness) were significantly associated with improvements in positive and negative symptoms.

    “A 2-year longitudinal follow-up study of the relationships between changes in the five facets of mindfulness (observing, describing, acting with awareness, nonjudging and nonreactivity) and the clinical outcomes of psychotic patients who received mindfulness training revealed that all facets of mindfulness significantly increased over time and that two facets (observing and acting with awareness)”

    From Dispositional Mindfulness and Psychotic Symptoms in Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorders: The Mediating Roles of Rumination and Negative Emotion (2022) · cites this paper as [50]

    Split into 2 atoms — 1 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 59 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [33]First MB Spitzer RL Gibbon M Williams JBW Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV-TR Axis I Disorders, Research Version, Patient Edition (SCID-I/P). New York, NY: Biometrics Research, New York State Psychiatric Institute (2002).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chien, W. T., Chow, K. M., Chong, Y. Y., Bressington, D., Choi, K. C., & Chan, C. W. H.
Affiliations
  • Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK)
  • Hong Kong Polytechnic University (HK)
Corresponding author
Chong, Yuen Yu
Venue
Frontiers in Psychiatry
Published
2020-03-11
Volume
11
Pages
177-177
ISSN
1664-0640 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3012557249
Cited by
33
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2018: 1
FWCI
1.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Psychiatry (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • PolyU Institutional Research Archive (Hong Kong Polytechnic University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Hong Kong Polytechnic University
  • Food and Health Bureau
  • Health and Medical Research Fund
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
mindfulness, psychosis, recent-onset psychosis, psychotic symptoms, functioning, insight into illness, subjective recovery, observation, acting with awareness, non-judgment, mental health outcomes, psychosocial outcomes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review